refactor-guided
# ClaudeWave Item: refactor-guided The refactor-guided command performs safe, incremental code refactoring by applying one structural change at a time, running tests after each step, and reverting immediately if tests fail. Use this command when you need to improve code structure without adding new features, ensuring that external behavior remains unchanged and every modification is verifiable and atomic.
mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2/HEAD/commands/refactor-guided.md -o ~/.claude/commands/refactor-guided.mdrefactor-guided.md
# Guided Refactoring Perform safe, incremental refactoring with test verification at every step. ## Context - Recent changes: !`git diff --name-only HEAD~3 2>/dev/null | head -10 || echo "No recent changes"` - Current branch: !`git branch --show-current` - Working tree status: !`git status --short` - Test framework: !`cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -E '"(jest|vitest|mocha)"' | head -1 || ls pytest.ini pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null | head -1 || ls Cargo.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null | head -1 || echo "Unknown"` - Existing tests: !`find . -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" 2>/dev/null | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go|rs)$' | head -10 || echo "No test files found"` ## Safety Rules (NON-NEGOTIABLE) 1. **NEVER refactor AND add features simultaneously.** Each change is purely structural. 2. **NEVER proceed without passing tests.** If tests fail after a refactoring, revert immediately. 3. **ONE refactoring at a time.** Each commit is a single, atomic refactoring step. 4. **Preserve external behavior.** Inputs and outputs must remain identical. 5. **Ensure clean working tree before starting.** Stash or commit uncommitted changes first. ## Workflow ### Phase 1: Analyze Scope 1. Identify the target file(s) or directory from `$ARGUMENTS` 2. Map all dependencies — files that import/use the target 3. Map all dependents — files that the target imports/uses 4. Assess blast radius: how many files could be affected? 5. Report scope summary before proceeding: ``` ## Refactoring Scope - Target: [file/directory] - Files affected: [count] - Dependencies: [list] - Dependents: [list] - Risk level: [low/medium/high] ``` ### Phase 2: Ensure Test Coverage 1. Check if tests exist for the current behavior of the target 2. Run existing tests to confirm they pass (this is your safety net) 3. If test coverage is insufficient: - Write tests that capture the current behavior BEFORE refactoring - Run them to confirm they pass - Commit these tests separately: `test: add coverage for [target] before refactoring` 4. Record baseline test results (pass count, time) ### Phase 3: Refactor Incrementally For each refactoring step: 1. **Describe** the specific refactoring about to be applied (e.g., "Extract method X from class Y", "Rename variable A to B", "Move function to separate module") 2. **Apply** the single refactoring change 3. **Run tests** immediately after applying 4. **If tests PASS:** - Commit with message: `refactor: [specific change description]` - Move to next refactoring step 5. **If tests FAIL:** - Revert the change: `git checkout -- .` - Analyze why it failed - Try a different approach or break it into smaller steps - Document what went wrong Common refactoring types (apply as appropriate): - Extract function/method - Rename for clarity - Remove duplication (DRY) - Simplify conditionals - Split large files/functions - Improve type signatures - Replace magic values with constants - Consolidate imports ### Phase 4: Summary Report After all refactoring steps are complete, provide: ``` ## Refactoring Summary ### Before - Files: [count and names] - Lines of code: [approximate] - Complexity: [observations] ### After - Files: [count and names] - Lines of code: [approximate] - Complexity: [observations] ### Changes Applied 1. [refactoring 1] - [commit hash] 2. [refactoring 2] - [commit hash] ... ### Reverted Attempts 1. [what was tried] - [why it failed] ### Test Results - All tests passing: [yes/no] - Tests added: [count] - Total test runs: [count] ``` ## Target $ARGUMENTS If no target specified, analyze the most recently modified files and suggest refactoring opportunities.
Add tests for recently changed files or specified code
Analyzes codebases to understand structure, tech stack, patterns, and conventions. Use when onboarding to a new project, exploring unfamiliar code, or when asked "how does this work?" or "what's the architecture?
System design and architecture planning mode. Focuses on high-level design, trade-offs, and technical decisions before implementation.
Explore the repository with 10 parallel subagents to create comprehensive documentation. Creates CODEBASE.md with full architecture analysis.
Expert code review specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying code, before commits, when asked to review changes, PR review, code quality check, lint, or standards audit. Focuses on quality, security, performance, and maintainability.
Simplifies code after implementation. Reviews recent changes and suggests/applies simplifications while preserving behavior.
Create a conventional commit with auto-generated message
Commit staged changes, push to remote, and create a pull request