Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
ES, Spanish
Slash Command5.2k estrellas del repoactualizado 5d ago

report

The /report command generates submission-ready bug bounty reports formatted for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, or Immunefi platforms. It produces structured vulnerability disclosures with CVSS 3.1 scoring, proof-of-concept HTTP requests, quantified impact statements, and specific remediation guidance. Use this after running /validate to ensure all validation gates pass, providing platform choice, bug classification, affected endpoint, test accounts, HTTP request/response pairs, and tech stack details.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter/HEAD/commands/report.md -o ~/.claude/commands/report.md
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el slash command carga automáticamente.

report.md

# /report

Generate a submission-ready bug bounty report.

## Pre-Conditions

Run `/validate` first. All 4 gates must pass before running this command.

Never write a report before validating. N/A submissions hurt your validity ratio.

## Usage

```
/report
```

Provide when prompted:
- Platform (HackerOne / Bugcrowd / Intigriti / Immunefi)
- Bug class
- Affected endpoint
- Your two test accounts and their IDs
- The exact HTTP request that demonstrates the bug
- The exact response that shows the impact
- Tech stack (for CVSS and remediation advice)

## What This Generates

1. Title following the formula: `[Bug Class] in [Endpoint] allows [actor] to [impact]`
2. Summary paragraph (impact-first, no "could potentially")
3. Vulnerability details with CVSS 3.1 score and vector string
4. Steps to Reproduce with copy-paste HTTP requests
5. Impact statement with quantification
6. Recommended fix (1-2 sentences, specific)
7. Supporting materials section

## Platform Selection

### HackerOne Format
- Markdown sections: Summary, Vulnerability Details, Steps to Reproduce, Impact, Recommended Fix
- Include CVSS 3.1 score + vector string
- Include two test account setup instructions
- Keep under 600 words

### Bugcrowd Format
- Title with VRT category: `[VRT Category] > [Subcategory] > P[1-4]`
- Expected vs Actual Behavior section
- Severity Justification section referencing Bugcrowd VRT

### Intigriti Format
- CVSS score prominent at top
- Clear reproduction steps
- Business impact focused

### Immunefi Format (Web3)
- Root cause in Solidity code
- Foundry PoC test included
- Economic impact quantified in $ value
- Comparison evidence (same check present elsewhere, missing here)

## Writing Rules

1. **Never use:** "could potentially", "may allow", "might be possible"
2. **Always prove:** show actual data/action, not just "200 OK"
3. **Impact first:** sentence 1 = what attacker gets, not what the bug is
4. **Quantify:** how many users affected, what data type, $ amount
5. **Short:** triagers skim. < 600 words.
6. **Human:** write to a person, not a system

## CVSS 3.1 Calculation Guide

Common patterns:
```
IDOR read PII (any user, auth needed):
→ AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N = 6.5 Medium

Auth bypass → admin (no auth):
→ AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.8 Critical

SSRF → cloud metadata:
→ AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N = 9.1 Critical

Stored XSS (any user, scope changed):
→ AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N = 8.2 High
```

## Escalation Language

Use when payout is being downgraded:
```
"This requires only a free account — no special privileges."
"The exposed data includes [PII type], subject to GDPR/CCPA requirements."
"An attacker can automate this — all [N] records in [X] minutes with a simple loop."
"This is exploitable externally without any internal network access."
"The impact is equivalent to a full data breach of [feature/data type]."
```

## Final Checklist Before Submitting

```
[ ] Title follows formula
[ ] First sentence states exact impact
[ ] HTTP request is copy-pasteable
[ ] Response showing impact included
[ ] Two accounts used (not self-testing)
[ ] CVSS calculated and included
[ ] Fix: 1-2 sentences
[ ] No typos in endpoint/param names
[ ] Under 600 words
[ ] Severity matches impact (no overclaiming)
[ ] NEVER used "could potentially"
```
apk-redteam-pipelineSkill

End-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx decompilation, secret/URL/JWT/Firebase grep, pinned-cert extraction, exported-component enumeration, Frida runtime instrumentation templates, intent-injection probes. Built from an authorized external red-team engagement where 7 APKs were pulled manually, 4 download attempts truncated, and a hardcoded JWT + 30 internal API endpoints were recovered from one of the apps. Use when target has a mobile app catalogue (Play Store developer page), when you find an APK URL hosted on a web server, or when post-recon mentions "mobile app" in scope.

autopilotSlash Command

Run autonomous hunt loop on a target — scope check → recon → rank surface → hunt → validate → report with configurable checkpoints. Usage: /autopilot target.com [--paranoid|--normal|--yolo]

bb-local-toolkitSkill

Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

bb-methodologySkill

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process.

bug-bountySkill

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

bugcrowd-reportingSkill

Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.

chainSlash Command

Build an exploit chain — given bug A, finds B and C to combine for higher severity and payout. Knows common chain patterns: IDOR→ATO, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth. Usage: /chain

cloud-iam-deepSkill

Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.