Slash Command90 estrellas del repoactualizado 27d ago
rebase
Rebase current branch onto trunk (origin/master or origin/main), predict and resolve conflicts
Instalar en Claude Code
Copiarmkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tony/claude-code-riper-5/HEAD/.claude/commands/rebase.md -o ~/.claude/commands/rebase.mdDespués abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el slash command carga automáticamente.
Definición
rebase.md
## Context
- Current branch: !`git branch --show-current`
- Trunk branch: !`git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}' || echo "master"`
- Remote refs available: !`git remote -v 2>/dev/null | head -2`
- Commits on current branch not on trunk: !`TRUNK=$(git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}' || echo "master"); git log --oneline "origin/${TRUNK}..HEAD" 2>/dev/null || echo "(could not determine commits ahead)"`
- Diff from trunk (summary): !`TRUNK=$(git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}' || echo "master"); git diff --stat "origin/${TRUNK}" 2>/dev/null || echo "(could not diff against trunk)"`
## Your Task
Rebase the current branch onto the remote trunk branch. Follow these steps carefully, handling each phase before moving to the next.
### Phase 1: Detect trunk branch
Determine the trunk branch name from the context above (the "Trunk branch" value). Store it mentally as `TRUNK`. It will typically be `master` or `main`. If detection failed, try both `origin/master` and `origin/main` to see which exists.
### Phase 2: Fetch latest and analyze
1. Run `git fetch origin` to get the latest remote state.
2. Run `git diff origin/${TRUNK}...HEAD --stat` to see what files the current branch modifies.
3. Run `git diff origin/${TRUNK}...HEAD` to see the full diff of changes on this branch.
4. Run `git log --oneline origin/${TRUNK}..HEAD` to see commits that will be rebased.
5. Run `git diff origin/${TRUNK} -- $(git diff --name-only origin/${TRUNK}...HEAD)` to check if trunk has also modified any of the same files — these are potential conflict zones.
Report a brief summary of:
- How many commits will be rebased
- Which files were changed on this branch
- Which of those files were ALSO changed on trunk (potential conflicts)
- An assessment of conflict likelihood (none expected / minor / significant)
### Phase 3: Execute the rebase
Run:
```
git pull --rebase origin ${TRUNK} --autostash
```
If the rebase completes cleanly (exit code 0), skip to Phase 5.
### Phase 4: Resolve conflicts (if any)
If conflicts are detected:
1. Run `git status` to see which files have conflicts.
2. For each conflicted file:
a. Read the file to see the conflict markers (`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`)
b. Understand both sides of the conflict by examining what the branch intended vs what trunk changed
c. Resolve the conflict by editing the file — preserve the intent of BOTH changes when possible. When in doubt, prefer the branch's changes (our work) but integrate trunk's changes if they're structural (renames, new parameters, etc.)
d. Run `git add <file>` to mark it resolved
3. Before continuing the rebase, run the project's pre-commit quality checks. Look for CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md in the repo root to find the project's required checks. Common checks include:
- Formatting: `uv run ruff format .` (or whatever the project uses)
- Linting: `uv run ruff check . --fix --show-fixes`
- Type checking: `uv run mypy`
- Tests: `uv run pytest`
If any check fails, fix the issues and re-stage with `git add` before continuing.
4. Run `git rebase --continue` to proceed.
5. If more conflicts appear, repeat from step 1 of this phase.
6. If the rebase becomes unrecoverable, run `git rebase --abort` and report what went wrong.
### Phase 5: Verify final state
After the rebase completes successfully:
1. Run `git log --oneline -10` to confirm the rebased commit history looks correct.
2. Run `git status` to confirm a clean working tree.
3. Run the project's quality checks one final time (format, lint, typecheck, test) as described in Phase 4 step 3.
4. Report the results: how many commits were rebased, whether any conflicts were resolved, and the final state of all quality checks.
Do NOT force-push. Only report the final state and let the user decide on the next step.Del mismo repositorio
plan-executeSubagent
Planning and execution phase - specifications and implementation
research-innovateSubagent
Research and innovation phase - information gathering and brainstorming
reviewSlash Command
Enter REVIEW mode to validate implementation
listSlash Command
List all memories across branches
recallSlash Command
Recall memories from current branch's memory bank
saveSlash Command
Save context to branch-aware memory bank
executeSlash Command
Enter EXECUTE mode to implement approved plan
innovateSlash Command
Enter INNOVATE mode for brainstorming approaches