Every git worktree gets its own isolated local world — ports, env, a database slice, and URLs. One `binky up` per branch.
claude mcp add binky -- uvx --from{
"mcpServers": {
"binky": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["--from"],
"env": {
"WEB_URL": "<web_url>",
"API_URL": "<api_url>"
}
}
}
}WEB_URLAPI_URLResumen de MCP Servers
<div align="center">
<img src="site/binky.svg" alt="" width="88" />
# Binky
**One isolated local world per git worktree — ports, env, database, URLs.**
So a swarm of coding agents runs in parallel on one machine without anything colliding.
[](https://github.com/andreisilva1/binky/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://pypi.org/project/binky/)
[](pyproject.toml)
[](LICENSE)
[Docs](https://binky-dev.vercel.app/) · [Quickstart](#quickstart) · [Adapters](#adapters) · [Commands](#commands) · [For agents](#for-agents) · [How it works](#how-it-works) · [Troubleshooting](TROUBLESHOOTING.md)
</div>
---
`docker-compose` was built for one process at a time. Binky is built for fifteen at once.
> **Status: alpha.** The core works end to end — worktree isolation, ports, adapters, supervision,
> reconciler, admission, proxy, HTTPS. The config format is stable; the CLI may still move.
## The problem
You point three agents at the same repo. The second one runs `pnpm dev` and gets `EADDRINUSE`.
The third runs your migrations and drops the table the first was reading. You start hand-editing
`.env` files, and now you're the scheduler.
Binky is the scheduler. One `binky up <branch>` per agent, and each gets its own ports, its own
database, its own URLs — from the same committed config.
## Install
Python 3.11+ and git, on **Linux or Windows** — the two platforms Binky is tested on for real.
macOS isn't a supported target yet; a well-tested port would be a welcome [contribution](CONTRIBUTING.md).
```bash
uv tool install binky # or: pipx install binky
binky --version
```
Or from a clone, to run the unreleased `main` or to hack on it:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/andreisilva1/binky && cd binky
uv tool install . # or: pipx install .
```
Adapters that need a driver ship as extras — installing Binky for Redis shouldn't pull `boto3`:
```bash
uv tool install "binky[postgres]" # or [redis], [mysql], [mongodb], [s3], [kafka]
uv tool install "binky[all-adapters]" # the whole matrix
```
## Quickstart
Already have a `docker-compose.yml`? Start from it:
```bash
binky init # writes a binky.toml you can read and edit
binky check # validate it
```
Or write it by hand — this is the whole config:
```toml
[project]
name = "acme"
[services.web]
cmd = "pnpm dev --port ${self.port}"
url = "web" # → web.<worktree>.acme.localhost
depends_on = ["api"]
env = { API_URL = "${api.url}" }
[services.api]
cmd = "go run ./cmd/server"
url = "api" # asking for a URL is what asks for a port
depends_on = ["db"]
env = { DATABASE_URL = "${db.url}" }
[services.db]
adapter = "postgres" # a private database per worktree
admin_url = "${env.POSTGRES_ADMIN_URL}"
migrate = "make migrate"
seed = "make seed"
clone_from = "golden" # migrate+seed once, then copy per worktree
```
Then bring worktrees up in parallel:
```console
$ binky up login-fix
api pid 16560 :4846
web pid 29732 :4504
✓ up: login-fix (2 service(s))
$ binky up checkout-v2
api pid 21768 :4137
web pid 46336 :4605
✓ up: checkout-v2 (2 service(s))
$ binky status
acme
checkout-v2 [running]
api :4137
web :4605
login-fix [running]
api :4846
web :4504
```
Two branches, four processes, four ports nobody chose by hand. Hand a worktree's coordinates to
whoever needs them — a shell, an agent, a test run:
```console
$ binky env login-fix --dotenv
WEB_URL=http://web.login-fix.acme.localhost
API_URL=http://api.login-fix.acme.localhost
```
And the rest of the lifecycle:
```bash
binky down login-fix # pause (keeps files + ports); `up` again is instant
binky remove login-fix # destroy it (refuses if there are uncommitted changes)
```
Nothing is hardcoded and nothing is discovered at runtime: every process boots already knowing the
whole port map, its own and its dependencies'.
> **One rule to internalise.** A service gets a port when it declares `url` or `ports` — asking is
> explicit. A service with neither gets none, which is correct for a worker or a one-shot job, and a
> trap if you then write `${self.port}` in its `cmd`. Unknown tokens are left alone rather than
> blanked, so the literal `${self.port}` reaches the shell and the process dies on its own argument
> parsing. `binky check` warns when a service does this.
## What it costs to run N worlds
The claim is that N isolated worlds shouldn't cost N times one world. Measured, not asserted —
`benchmarks/worlds.py` is in this repo and reproduces the table below (`postgres:16`, 200,000 rows
per world, Docker Desktop on Windows 11):
| worlds | RAM: a container each | RAM: Binky | time: a container each | time: Binky |
| ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 1 | 150 MiB | 174 MiB | 6s | 4s |
| 2 | 298 MiB | 182 MiB | 11s | 6s |
| 4 | 596 MiB | 228 MiB | 20s | 10s |
| 8 | 1197 MiB | 295 MiB | 40s | 16s |
**The 8th world costs +150 MiB and +4.8s as its own container, or +17 MiB and +1.7s under Binky.**
Read the first row too. At **one** world Binky is behind — it pays for a server plus a golden
template nobody is using yet, and only earns that back on the second. And **disk is not a win**:
`CREATE DATABASE ... TEMPLATE` is a file copy, not copy-on-write, so every world is still a full
copy of the rows. What Binky removes is the *server* per world, not the *bytes* per world. It also
doesn't make your own app processes cheaper — one dev server per worktree costs the same either way.
```bash
python benchmarks/worlds.py --sweep 1,2,4,8 --rows 200000
```
## When you don't need Binky
Worth saying plainly, because the first row of that table already says it:
- **One branch at a time.** If you never have two worlds up at once, Binky is a daemon and a config
file you didn't need. Use it when the second agent shows up.
- **Everything already runs in containers, and that's fine.** Binky's win is removing the *server*
per world. If your compose stack is small enough that N copies fit comfortably, there's nothing
to reclaim.
- **You need real isolation, not local isolation.** Binky runs your commands as you, on your
machine. It is not a sandbox — see [Security](#security).
## Adapters
An adapter carves an isolated **slice** of one shared server — a database, a key prefix, a bucket —
instead of running one server per worktree. **16 names, 10 implementations, every one exercised
against a real server in CI.**
| slice | adapters |
| --- | --- |
| a database | `postgres` · `mysql` · `mariadb` · `percona` · `mongodb` · `clickhouse` |
| a key prefix | `redis` · `valkey` |
| a bucket / prefix | `s3` · `minio` |
| a vhost / topic prefix | `rabbitmq` · `kafka` · `redpanda` |
| a collection | `qdrant` |
| an index prefix | `elasticsearch` · `opensearch` |
Protocol-compatible names share one implementation rather than a copy of it — `valkey` is the Redis
adapter, `percona` is the MySQL one, `opensearch` is the Elasticsearch one.
### `clone_from`: pay for migrate+seed once
With `clone_from`, the first `binky up` builds a **golden template** — provision, migrate, seed —
and every worktree after that is a copy of it. The template is keyed by a hash of your `migrate` and
`seed` commands, so changing either rebuilds it automatically.
Supported where the server can copy a slice server-side (`postgres`, `mysql`, `mariadb`, `percona`,
`mongodb`). Where it isn't, or where a clone fails on something environmental — a client binary too
old to authenticate, a missing grant — Binky **falls back** to provision+migrate+seed for that
worktree and logs `clone_fallback`. Correctness never depends on cloning; only speed does.
One sharp edge worth knowing: the hash covers the migrate and seed *commands*, not the files they
call. Editing a script those commands run does not rebuild the template — delete its marker under
`~/.binky/golden/` to force one.
### Writing your own
Two tiers, one contract. Both implement the same four verbs:
| verb | does |
| --- | --- |
| `provision(slice)` | create the slice (`CREATE DATABASE ...`) |
| `resolve(slice)` | return its address → `${db.url}` |
| `teardown(slice)` | destroy it |
| `capabilities()` | what it supports, e.g. `{"clone": true}` |
**In-process** adapters are Python classes in this repo, discovered by name. **External** adapters
are executables in any language, discovered as `binky-adapter-<name>` on `PATH` and driven over a
one-shot subprocess + JSON protocol:
```console
$ binky-adapter-filestore provision <<< '{"slice": "acme_login-fix", "config": {}}'
{"ok": true}
$ binky-adapter-filestore resolve <<< '{"slice": "acme_login-fix", "config": {}}'
{"ok": true, "address": "file:///tmp/binky-filestore/acme_login-fix"}
```
Python authors get the protocol for free — `binky.adapter_sdk.run()` bridges a normal adapter class
to it. See [examples/adapters/filestore.py](examples/adapters/filestore.py) for a complete,
dependency-free one in 30 lines.
## Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
| `binky init [dir] [--force]` | Write a starting `binky.toml` from `docker-compose.yml` + `.env` |
| `binky check [path]` | Validate a `binky.toml` and flag footguns |
| `binky up <name> [--group g]` | Create/use the branch's worktree, allocate ports, provision resources, start services |
| `binky reload <name> [--group g]` | Restart in place — stop, then bring back up on the same ports and data |
| `binky down <name>` | Stop the worktree's processes (keeps its files and ports) |
| `binky remove <name> [--force]` | Destroy the worktree — stop, drop its slices, remove its files |
| `binky status [.]` | List worktrees (grouped by project); `.` = cLo que la gente pregunta sobre binky
¿Qué es andreisilva1/binky?
+
andreisilva1/binky es mcp servers para el ecosistema de Claude AI. Every git worktree gets its own isolated local world — ports, env, a database slice, and URLs. One `binky up` per branch. Tiene 1 estrellas en GitHub y se actualizó por última vez today.
¿Cómo se instala binky?
+
Puedes instalar binky clonando el repositorio (https://github.com/andreisilva1/binky) o siguiendo las instrucciones del README en GitHub. ClaudeWave también te ofrece bloques de instalación rápida en esta misma página.
¿Es seguro usar andreisilva1/binky?
+
andreisilva1/binky aún no ha sido auditado por nuestro agente de seguridad. Revisa el repositorio original en GitHub antes de usarlo en producción.
¿Quién mantiene andreisilva1/binky?
+
andreisilva1/binky es mantenido por andreisilva1. La última actividad registrada en GitHub es de today, con 0 issues abiertos.
¿Hay alternativas a binky?
+
Sí. En ClaudeWave puedes explorar mcp servers similares en /categories/mcp, ordenados por popularidad o actividad reciente.
Despliega binky en tu cloud
Lleva este repo a producción en minutos. Cada plataforma genera su propio entorno con variables de entorno editables.
¿Mantienes este repo? Añade un badge a tu README
Pega el badge en tu README de GitHub para mostrar que está auditado por ClaudeWave. Cada badge enlaza de vuelta a esta página y muestra el Trust Score actual.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/andreisilva1-binky)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/andreisilva1-binky"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/andreisilva1-binky" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: andreisilva1/binky" width="320" height="64" /></a>Más MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl!