TuringCorp Decider — MCP server discovery metadata (registry manifest, listing docs)
- ✓Open-source license (MIT)
- ✓Actively maintained (<30d)
- ✓Clear description
- ✓Documented (README)
claude mcp add mcp -- npx -y mcp-remote{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-remote"]
}
}
}Resumen de MCP Servers
# TuringCorp — MCP server
A **judge for agent decisions**. Your agent has two defensible options and has to pick one. Send both: a **panel of models** judges them together and returns the better one, **how far apart it judged them** (a calibrated confidence), and why.
- **Endpoint (canonical):** `https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp`
- **Aliases:** `https://mcp.turingcorp.net/` and `https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp/`
- **Health:** `https://mcp.turingcorp.net/healthz`
- **Transport:** Streamable HTTP, **stateless** (no session, no Durable Object). `GET /mcp` → 405 is normal.
- **Protocol:** MCP `2026-07-28` (modern) **and** `2025-06-18` (legacy) — one route serves both.
- **Discovery methods** (`server/discover`, `tools/list`) need **no credentials** — directory scanners can read the full tool list unauthenticated, by design.
## The one tool: `decide`
| | |
|---|---|
| **In** | `task` (string), `option_a` (string), `option_b` (string) — all required |
| **Out** | `better_option` (`"A"` \| `"B"`), `confidence` (percentage string, e.g. `"83.3%"`), `reason` (string) |
| **Annotations** | `readOnlyHint: true` · `openWorldHint: false` · `idempotentHint: false` |
| **Latency** | Expect 60-90 seconds per call: set your client timeout to at least 180 seconds (300 recommended). A 60-second default cuts the call off before the answer arrives. |
`confidence` is **this service's own judgement of how far apart the two options were** — a reference for your decision-making, not an instruction, not a result, and not a prediction of how the choice turns out. As a rough reading: ≥90% clearly apart · 80–90% apart, less clearly · 70–80% a closer call · <70% close to evenly matched. These ranges are descriptive only. **Choose your own threshold for your own use case; for high-stakes or irreversible decisions apply your own review policy.** Observed accuracy for each range, and how it was measured, is published at <https://api.turingcorp.net> — that page is the authority on the bands and their measured accuracy.
⚠️ `idempotentHint: false` is an honest declaration: there is currently no idempotency key, so a client that times out and retries **may be charged twice**.
## See it decide first
There is no free tier, so we publish the evidence instead: **27 real decisions, recorded verbatim** — the question, both options, which one was preferred, the confidence reported, and the reason. Nine domains, three cases each: Writing · Tech · Business · Research · Career · Money · People · Travel · Everyday.
→ **<https://github.com/TuringCorp-net/poe-demo-public>** — dataset: [`examples.json`](https://github.com/TuringCorp-net/poe-demo-public/blob/main/examples.json)
Read the confidence column first. On ordinary, closely matched questions it reports **70–90%, not 99%** — and that is the point of a calibrated number rather than a decorative one: a high value means the comparison was decisive and the pick can be acted on, a low value means the two options really are close and the choice stays yours. In this set the range is **27.3%–88.3%, median 74.0%, none above 90%**, because these are everyday close calls, not easy ones. What the bands deliver when they *are* decisive is published at <https://api.turingcorp.net>.
## Authentication
Send an **Agent Pass**: `Authorization: Bearer <pass>`.
Issued at **<https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net>** — self-service signup (email verification) → top up → get a pass. A pass is valid for **7 days** and can be re-rolled. If a call is refused as an invalid credential, sign in there again and re-roll.
Errors fall into **two classes**, and they arrive in different places:
> Credential problems are rejected before the call (HTTP 401 + `WWW-Authenticate`). Business failures come back as a tool result with `isError: true` plus a JSON block `{error, http_status, action_url, message}` — `http_status` is the upstream status; the tool call itself is HTTP 200.
| Class | What comes back | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| **Credential** | HTTP `401` + `WWW-Authenticate` — no tool result is produced | no credential · expired or invalid pass (`invalid_credential`, with a re-login URL in the message) |
| **Business** | HTTP `200`, tool result `isError: true`, plus a JSON block | insufficient balance (`http_status` `402`, `action_url` pointing at top-up) · over quota (`http_status` `429`) |
Branch on the **HTTP status first**: a `401` will not succeed on retry without a new credential, whereas a business failure was a call that ran and was declined — read the block for the reason and the next step. The detailed contract is under *Errors are machine-readable* below.
Entry rate limit: **120 requests / 60 s / client IP**. This is flood damping, not a quota — the real per-key quota is enforced separately. The counter is approximate: it is maintained per edge location and is eventually consistent, so a brief overshoot is possible.
## Quickstart
You need an **Agent Pass** to call the tool. Discovery (`tools/list`) works without one — calling `decide` does not.
### 1. Get an Agent Pass
Self-service at **<https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net>**: sign up with an email address, verify it, add credit. The pass is shown once; it is valid for **7 days** and can be re-rolled at any time. Agents can do the same thing over the API — see that site's `/llms.txt`.
### 2. Point your client at the endpoint
**Claude Desktop / Cursor / any client that reads a JSON config:**
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"decider": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-remote@latest", "https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp"],
"env": { "AUTHORIZATION": "Bearer <your Agent Pass>" }
}
}
}
```
> ⚠️ A bare `npx -y mcp-remote@latest https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp` with no credential **will connect and list tools, then fail on the first call** with 401. That is expected — discovery is open, execution is not.
**Claude Code:**
```bash
claude mcp add --transport http decider https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer <your Agent Pass>"
```
### 3. Sanity-check it yourself
**Discovery — no credentials needed:**
```bash
curl -s -X POST https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-H 'accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-H 'mcp-protocol-version: 2026-07-28' \
-H 'mcp-method: tools/list' \
--data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list","params":{"_meta":{"io.modelcontextprotocol/protocolVersion":"2026-07-28","io.modelcontextprotocol/clientCapabilities":{}}}}'
```
**Calling the tool** additionally needs `mcp-name: decide` and the credential:
```bash
curl -s -X POST https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-H 'accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-H 'mcp-protocol-version: 2026-07-28' \
-H 'mcp-method: tools/call' \
-H 'mcp-name: decide' \
-H "authorization: Bearer $AGENT_PASS" \
--data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"decide","arguments":{"task":"Pick a launch date","option_a":"Ship now","option_b":"Wait two weeks"},"_meta":{"io.modelcontextprotocol/protocolVersion":"2026-07-28","io.modelcontextprotocol/clientCapabilities":{}}}}'
```
### Versions
Two version numbers exist and they are **not** meant to match:
| | meaning |
|---|---|
| **Registry `version`** (`server.json`) | the **listing** version - the metadata record (endpoint, auth declaration, icon, links). Advances when the listing changes. |
| **`serverInfo.version`** (from the live endpoint) | the **runtime** version of the deployed server. Advances when behavior changes. |
A listing-only change (for example a corrected link) advances the registry version without
touching the runtime, so the two can legitimately differ.
### Protocol details worth knowing
- **`Accept` must contain both** `application/json` **and** `text/event-stream`, or you get 406.
- **Protocol versions:** one route serves both generations.
- **Modern `2026-07-28`** — no `initialize` handshake; use `server/discover` and `_meta`.
- **Legacy** — standard `initialize` handshake. Measured negotiation: a client asking for `2025-11-25`, `2025-06-18`, or `2025-03-26` is answered with **exactly the version it asked for**; a modern `2026-07-28` `initialize` (which is not part of that generation) is answered with `2025-11-25`.
- Server capability discovery via `tools/list` and `server/discover` needs no credentials.
- **Errors are machine-readable.** There are two distinct kinds, and they arrive differently — so branch on the right thing:
| What failed | How you see it | What to branch on |
|---|---|---|
| **Credential** missing or invalid | **HTTP `401`** with a `WWW-Authenticate` challenge (carrying `error="invalid_token"` and `resource_metadata`); the body is a standard JSON-RPC error with `error.code = -32001`. No tool result is produced. | the **HTTP status code** |
| **Business** failure — insufficient balance, quota, upstream error | a normal tool result (`isError: true`) whose **second `content` block** is a single JSON object you can `JSON.parse`, e.g. `{"error":"insufficient_balance","http_status":"402","action_url":"…","message":"…"}` | the **`error` field** inside that block |
In short: credential problems are rejected before the tool runs, so they never appear as a tool result; everything else that fails after that does, with a machine-readable block attached.
- **Authorization discovery:** `401` responses carry a `resource_metadata` pointing at `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource`. Note that this server uses a **static bearer credential, not OAuth** — that document says so explicitly rather than sending you into an OAuth flow that does not exist.
## Not for browser clients
This endpoint deliberately does **not** serve browser-based (cross-origin) MCP clients: requests carrying a browser `Origin` header other than localhost are rejected with 403, and no CORS headers are returned. Browser tooling such as the MCP Inspector works by proxying thrLo que la gente pregunta sobre MCP
¿Qué es TuringCorp-net/MCP?
+
TuringCorp-net/MCP es mcp servers para el ecosistema de Claude AI. TuringCorp Decider — MCP server discovery metadata (registry manifest, listing docs) Tiene 0 estrellas en GitHub y su última actualización registrada es del 2026-09-23.
¿Cómo se instala MCP?
+
Puedes instalar MCP clonando el repositorio (https://github.com/TuringCorp-net/MCP) o siguiendo las instrucciones del README en GitHub. ClaudeWave también te ofrece bloques de instalación rápida en esta misma página.
¿Es seguro usar TuringCorp-net/MCP?
+
Nuestro agente de seguridad ha analizado TuringCorp-net/MCP y le ha asignado un Trust Score de 87/100 (tier: Trusted). Revisa el desglose completo de comprobaciones superadas y flags en esta página.
¿Quién mantiene TuringCorp-net/MCP?
+
TuringCorp-net/MCP es mantenido por TuringCorp-net. La última actividad registrada en GitHub es del 2026-09-23, con 0 issues abiertos.
¿Hay alternativas a MCP?
+
Sí. En ClaudeWave puedes explorar mcp servers similares en /categories/mcp, ordenados por popularidad o actividad reciente.
Despliega MCP en tu cloud
Lleva este repo a producción en minutos. Cada plataforma genera su propio entorno con variables de entorno editables.
¿Mantienes este repo? Añade un badge a tu README
Pega el badge en tu README de GitHub para mostrar que está auditado por ClaudeWave. Cada badge enlaza de vuelta a esta página y muestra el Trust Score actual.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/turingcorp-net-mcp)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/turingcorp-net-mcp"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/turingcorp-net-mcp" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: TuringCorp-net/MCP" width="320" height="64" /></a>Más MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.