Offline signed-receipt verification with independently supplied keys. Shared browser/CLI engine, explicit formats and trust boundaries. Apache-2.0.
- ✓Actively maintained (<30d)
- ✓Clear description
- ✓Topics declared
- ✓Documented (README)
- !Licence file present but not machine-readable
git clone https://github.com/VeritasActa/verify && cp verify/*.md ~/.claude/agents/Resumen de Subagents
# @veritasacta/verify **Check signed records yourself, without contacting the issuing service.** An offline CLI and a shared browser receipt engine. Supply a receipt and a public key obtained through a separate trusted channel, then apply your own trust policy. No account, proxy, signing daemon or onboarding step is required to verify a receipt. [Try the browser sample](https://www.veritasacta.com/verify?sample=current) · [Receipt specification](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/) · [Conformance evidence](https://www.veritasacta.com/conformance) ## Verify an existing receipt ```bash npm install -g @veritasacta/verify verify receipt.json --key YOUR_INDEPENDENTLY_OBTAINED_PUBLIC_KEY ``` The key is 64 hexadecimal characters. Do not treat a key supplied with an unknown receipt as an independent trust pin. This verification path runs offline once the package is installed; installation and explicitly requested URL/JWKS lookups use the network. To try the public example, download [this receipt](samples/current-receipt.json) and use its **demonstration-only** key: ```bash verify current-receipt.json --key ebb8cf3efc78717c50e7c438c0ad5498f8fa4e09607fea1e030ac129b5965225 ``` A valid signature is not proof of claim truth, complete action coverage, signer authority or recipient acceptance. A signed timestamp is an issuer assertion, not an independent timestamp. ## Read the outcome correctly | Outcome | Meaning | Next step | | --- | --- | --- | | Verified / exit 0 | The checks implemented for this profile passed | Apply identity, authority and reliance policies; read warnings and binding scope | | Failed / exit 1 | A verification check failed | Check the expected key, signature, structure and reported error | | Not checked / exit 2 | The verifier could not decide | Supply missing material or use a supported format/algorithm | **Exit 1 does not prove tampering.** Supplying the wrong expected key can produce the same result. Some legacy JSON error categories use the name `tampered` for compatibility; it denotes failed verification, not a forensic conclusion. See [error codes](ERRORS.md) and the profile-specific output. ## Browser and CLI Both use `src/detect.js`, `src/engines/ed25519-receipt.js` and the same canonicalizer. The browser bundle is published in `browser/`, with a SHA-256 build manifest. The browser accepts individual Ed25519 envelopes, v2 structured receipts, v1 flat receipts and historical website `receipt_version: "1.0"` receipts. That historical profile excluded `public_key` from signing and is explicitly labelled; it is not silently promoted to draft-03 conformance. All browser profiles require an external key. Unsupported formats are **not checked**, not reported as bad signatures. Both entry points reject duplicate JSON members before parsing. The browser limits input to 1 MiB and depth 64; the CLI file parser allows 50 MiB and depth 128. Bundles and specialist profiles, including selective disclosure, VOPRF, Knowledge Units, Gate evidence and governed-run manifests, require the CLI. Profile success only establishes the checks named in that output, not universal completeness. ## Choose a guide | Task | Guide | | --- | --- | | Verify bundles, chains, prompts or specialist artifacts | [Advanced reference](docs/reference.md) | | Issue receipts or configure a proxy/daemon | [Issuance and adapters](docs/issuance.md) | | Understand threats and limitations | [Threat model](THREAT-MODEL.md) | | Report a vulnerability | [Security policy](SECURITY.md) | | Inspect exact release changes | [Changelog](CHANGELOG.md) | ## Release integrity, not publisher authentication `verify --self-check` recomputes monitored source hashes against a **bundled integrity commitment** (the Sigil). It detects drift from that commitment. Someone replacing both the code and commitment can create a new internally consistent package. It does **not** independently authenticate the publisher or establish a canonical release. Pin a reference obtained independently and inspect release provenance. `--attest` is a local, self-signed integrity statement; separately pin its key before relying on it. ## Release and standards status <!-- release-manifest:start --> Verifier: **[0.10.25](https://github.com/VeritasActa/verify/releases/tag/v0.10.25)**. Status reviewed 2026-10-19. - [draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts-03](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/): active individual Internet-Draft. - [draft-farley-acta-knowledge-units-00](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-knowledge-units/): expired individual Internet-Draft (expired 2026-10-08). Internet-Drafts are proposals, not adopted IETF standards or endorsements. <!-- release-manifest:end --> [`release-manifest.json`](release-manifest.json) is the source for version/status blocks in this README, the website, the organisation profile and draft index. `node scripts/sync-public-metadata.mjs --check` checks sibling repository copies. No draft is revised or resubmitted by this synchronization. ## Development and maintainership Maintained by Tom Farley / ScopeBlind. Independent verification does not imply independent organizational governance. Contributions should include reproducible fixtures and negative cases. [Open an issue](https://github.com/VeritasActa/verify/issues) for interoperability questions. ```bash npm ci npm run build:browser npm test npm run check:browser npm run check:sigil npm run test:conformance ``` Apache-2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE) and [PATENTS.md](PATENTS.md) for the actual terms. The Acta public record is a [separate reference application](https://github.com/VeritasActa/Acta). ScopeBlind / Legate are commercial applications, not prerequisites for verification.
Lo que la gente pregunta sobre verify
¿Qué es VeritasActa/verify?
+
VeritasActa/verify es subagents para el ecosistema de Claude AI. Offline signed-receipt verification with independently supplied keys. Shared browser/CLI engine, explicit formats and trust boundaries. Apache-2.0. Tiene 5 estrellas en GitHub y su última actualización registrada es del 2026-10-20.
¿Cómo se instala verify?
+
Puedes instalar verify clonando el repositorio (https://github.com/VeritasActa/verify) o siguiendo las instrucciones del README en GitHub. ClaudeWave también te ofrece bloques de instalación rápida en esta misma página.
¿Es seguro usar VeritasActa/verify?
+
Nuestro agente de seguridad ha analizado VeritasActa/verify y le ha asignado un Trust Score de 80/100 (tier: Trusted). Revisa el desglose completo de comprobaciones superadas y flags en esta página.
¿Quién mantiene VeritasActa/verify?
+
VeritasActa/verify es mantenido por VeritasActa. La última actividad registrada en GitHub es del 2026-10-20, con 5 issues abiertos.
¿Hay alternativas a verify?
+
Sí. En ClaudeWave puedes explorar subagents similares en /categories/agents, ordenados por popularidad o actividad reciente.
Despliega verify en tu cloud
Lleva este repo a producción en minutos. Cada plataforma genera su propio entorno con variables de entorno editables.
¿Mantienes este repo? Añade un badge a tu README
Pega el badge en tu README de GitHub para mostrar que está auditado por ClaudeWave. Cada badge enlaza de vuelta a esta página y muestra el Trust Score actual.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/veritasacta-verify)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/veritasacta-verify"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/veritasacta-verify" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: VeritasActa/verify" width="320" height="64" /></a>Más Subagents
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
The agent that grows with you
Makes your AI agent think like the laziest senior dev in the room. The best code is the code you never wrote.
Java 面试 & 后端通用面试指南,覆盖计算机基础、数据库、分布式、高并发、系统设计与 AI 应用开发
Build Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.
The agent engineering platform.