tdd-workflow
This skill enforces test-driven development practices by requiring developers to write comprehensive tests before implementing code. Use it when creating new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring to ensure minimum 80% test coverage across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, following a structured workflow that prioritizes tests first and includes user journey documentation, test case generation, and coverage verification.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC /tmp/tdd-workflow && cp -r /tmp/tdd-workflow/.agents/skills/tdd-workflow ~/.claude/skills/tdd-workflowSKILL.md
# Test-Driven Development Workflow
This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
## When to Activate
- Writing new features or functionality
- Fixing bugs or issues
- Refactoring existing code
- Adding API endpoints
- Creating new components
## Core Principles
### 1. Tests BEFORE Code
ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
### 2. Coverage Requirements
- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
- All edge cases covered
- Error scenarios tested
- Boundary conditions verified
### 3. Test Types
#### Unit Tests
- Individual functions and utilities
- Component logic
- Pure functions
- Helpers and utilities
#### Integration Tests
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Service interactions
- External API calls
#### E2E Tests (Playwright)
- Critical user flows
- Complete workflows
- Browser automation
- UI interactions
## TDD Workflow Steps
### Step 0: Detect the Test Runner
Do not assume `npm test`. The commands in the steps and examples below use `<test>`, `<test-watch>`, and `<coverage>` as placeholders for the project's actual runner. Resolve them once before starting:
1. **Run the package-manager detector** (ships with ECC):
```bash
node scripts/setup-package-manager.js --detect
```
It resolves the package manager (npm / pnpm / yarn / bun) from, in order: `CLAUDE_PACKAGE_MANAGER`, `.claude/package-manager.json`, the `package.json` `packageManager` field, the lockfile, then global config.
2. **Distinguish the package manager from the test runner — they are not the same.** A project can use Bun to install dependencies yet still run Jest or Vitest. Inspect `package.json` `scripts.test` and the test files:
- `scripts.test` invokes `jest` / `vitest` -> run through the detected PM (`npm test`, `pnpm test`, `yarn test`, or `bun run test`).
- `scripts.test` is `bun test`, or test files `import { test, expect } from "bun:test"`, or there is no jest/vitest config but Bun is present -> use **Bun's native runner** (`bun test`). See [Bun Native Test Pattern](#bun-native-test-pattern-buntest) below.
Runner command matrix:
| Runner | `<test>` | `<test-watch>` | `<coverage>` | `<lint>` |
|--------|----------|----------------|--------------|----------|
| npm | `npm test` | `npm test -- --watch` | `npm run test:coverage` | `npm run lint` |
| pnpm | `pnpm test` | `pnpm test --watch` | `pnpm test:coverage` | `pnpm lint` |
| yarn | `yarn test` | `yarn test --watch` | `yarn test:coverage` | `yarn lint` |
| Bun (script runs jest/vitest) | `bun run test` | `bun run test --watch` | `bun run test:coverage` | `bun run lint` |
| Bun (native `bun:test`) | `bun test` | `bun test --watch` | `bun test --coverage` | `bun run lint` |
> `bun test` (Bun's built-in runner) is **not** the same as `bun run test` (which runs the `package.json` `test` script). Picking the wrong one is a common failure — e.g. invoking Jest through `npx`/`bun run` in an ESM-only project breaks, while `bun test` runs the suite natively. Confirm which the project expects before the RED gate, then substitute `<test>` / `<coverage>` everywhere `npm test` appears below.
### Step 1: Write User Journeys
```
As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
Example:
As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.
```
### Step 2: Generate Test Cases
For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
```typescript
describe('Semantic Search', () => {
it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
// Test implementation
})
it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
// Test edge case
})
it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
// Test fallback behavior
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
// Test sorting logic
})
})
```
### Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
```bash
<test>
# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yet
```
### Step 4: Implement Code
Write minimal code to make tests pass:
```typescript
// Implementation guided by tests
export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
// Implementation here
}
```
### Step 5: Run Tests Again
```bash
<test>
# Tests should now pass
```
### Step 6: Refactor
Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Optimize performance
- Enhance readability
### Step 7: Verify Coverage
```bash
<coverage>
# Verify 80%+ coverage achieved
```
## Testing Patterns
### Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
```typescript
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { Button } from './Button'
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('renders with correct text', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
const handleClick = jest.fn()
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
})
```
### Bun Native Test Pattern (`bun:test`)
When the project uses Bun's built-in runner (see [Step 0](#step-0-detect-the-test-runner)), import from `bun:test` and run with `bun test` — not `bun run test`. The API is Jest-like, so `describe` / `it` / `expect` and most matchers carry over. See the `bun-runtime` skill for runtime, install, and bundler details.
```typescript
import { describe, it, expect, mock } from 'bun:test'
import { searchMarkets } from './search'
describe('searchMarkets', () => {
it('returns an empty list for an empty query', async () => {
expect(await searchMarkets('')).toEqual([])
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
const results = aWorkflow command scaffold for add-language-rules in everything-claude-code.
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
>
>
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.
>