dcf
DCF valuation model, discounted cash flow, intrinsic value, WACC calculation, terminal value, free cash flow projection, equity value per share, DCF sensitivity analysis, unlevered free cash flow, present value calculation, build a DCF
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentii-ai/agentii-investment-intelligence /tmp/dcf && cp -r /tmp/dcf/plugins/vertical-plugins/models-and-pitches/skills/agentii/dcf ~/.claude/skills/dcfSKILL.md
## Preflight
Run the canonical pre-flight sequence — MCP health probe, ticker resolution, workspace `style.md` override, memory load, and coverage check. See `contracts/preflight.md`.
Include the `X-Agentii-Trace` header on every tool call per `contracts/x-agentii-trace-header.md`.
## Triggers
- analyze dcf model
- run dcf model analysis
- produce dcf model report
- dcf model breakdown
- dcf model deep dive
- build a dcf model
- assess dcf model
- quantify dcf model
- compare dcf model across peers
- review dcf model for
- generate dcf model on
- dcf model for investment decision
## Defaults
| Parameter | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| lookback_years | 3 | Historical data window |
| include_peers | false | Whether to surface a peer comparison block |
## Methodology
### Retrieval Scope
This skill performs unstructured document search at scale across SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K). The three-layer agent-use-ready retrieval protocol (Document Discovery → Page Map → Deep Read) applies to all unstructured document search at scale.
### Retrieval Strategy
See `contracts/retrieval.md` for the canonical decision tree; skill-specific retrieval detail is in `references/methodology.md`.
### Temporal Scope
Default: 12 fiscal quarters (max 20). Financial modeling: trailing 12 quarters (3 fiscal years) for long-range projection inputs.
### Tool Allowlist
See frontmatter `allowed_tools`.
### Protocol
Step-by-step execution detail is in `references/methodology.md`.
## Deliverable Chain
**Inputs** → **Build** → **Validate** → **Output** → **Next**
1. **Inputs**: resolved ticker + `search_xbrl_facts` (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow) + `get_company_financials` + `get_realtime_quote` for current price.
2. **Build**: write a self-contained Python script using `openpyxl` that creates the DCF workbook (projections, WACC, terminal value, sensitivity tables) per `## Output Structure`. Execute via `Bash: python3 script.py`. Verify the `.xlsx` exists. If `import openpyxl` fails, fall back to `.md` summary with `data_availability: degraded` (see `contracts/office-tooling.md`).
3. **Validate**: run LibreOffice recalc; audit `hardcoded_count == 0` for tagged cells per `## Validation Gates`; verify projection horizon ≥ 5 years, terminal growth < risk-free proxy.
4. **Output**: write the artifact path per `## Output File`. (Optional) render an executive-summary `.pptx` via `Bash`+`python-pptx`; convert `.xlsx → PDF` via LibreOffice.
5. **Next**: append to `agentii.md`; hand off to a downstream pitch/review skill if requested.
## Validation Gates
1. **projection horizon**: ≥ 5 years (10 years for secular-trends analysis). *If failed*: If < 5 years: refuse delivery, report actual horizon.
2. **terminal growth rate**: < risk-free rate proxy (current 10Y UST). *If failed*: If terminal_g ≥ rf: flag in assumptions section, note conservatism violation.
3. **WACC components**: WACC = (E/V × Ke) + (D/V × Kd × (1-T) with all components cited to source data. *If failed*: If components uncited: refuse delivery, list missing citations.
4. **hardcoded_count**: == 0 for all cells tagged projection|margin|discount_factor|pv|sensitivity per xlsx_audit output. *If failed*: If hardcoded_count > 0: per the hardcode gate, refuse delivery. Bounce back to analytical-subagent ONCE with audit report.
5. **calculation arc cross-validation **: cross-statement balancing verified against `gold.xbrl_calculations` weights — the DCF free-cash-flow projection and income statement structure MUST align with the filer's reported concept hierarchy. Call `get_statement_structure/{ticker}?statement_type=income_statement&include_calculations=true`. Flag discrepancies ≥1% as audit findings. *If failed*: If material discrepancy (≥1%): flag in audit findings, refuse delivery for discrepancies ≥5%. Tool-diversity is also tracked here: distinct MCP tools used MUST be ≥ `min_tool_diversity` (5); below that, flag as depth-insufficient in Coverage Gaps (a quality signal, not a delivery blocker).
## Tool Fallbacks
Per-tool failure modes and fallback actions are tabulated in `references/tool-fallbacks.md`.
## Output File
Write the final deliverable to `{ticker}/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_dcf_{affix}.md` .
## Output Structure
The deliverable is a structured markdown report written to the path in `## Output File`. Full section-by-section template (headings, tables, and field definitions) lives in `references/output-structure.md`. Required elements:
1. **Executive Summary** — headline conclusions (≤200 words).
2. **Core analysis sections** — per this skill's methodology and analyst modes.
3. **Data classification** — tag findings `[FACT]` / `[DEDUCTED]` / `[VIEW]` per `contracts/snapshot-synthesis.md`.
4. **Coverage Gaps & Citations** — inline `/v/` citations are PRIMARY (immediately after each fact); the bottom **Citations** section is a non-duplicative roll-up index.
5. **Output frontmatter** — emit the FR-090 structured block per `contracts/output-frontmatter-schema.md`.
**Citations & memory**: follow `contracts/citation-and-memory.md` — ≥1 citation per 200 words; every material fact, table row, and metric is immediately followed by its inline clickable `https://agentii.ai/v/{ticker}/{citation_id}/{N}` link; a bottom **Citations** section provides a non-duplicative roll-up index; the closing TUI reply includes a compact **Key Citations** list (headline 5–10 facts) of clickable `/v/` URLs; and append the run to `agentii.md` per `contracts/agentii-md-schema.md`.
## Memory & Snapshot
- **Memory load** (pre-flight): load prior workspace context for the ticker before retrieval — see `contracts/memory-load.md`.
- **Structured output frontmatter**: emit the FR-090 block (`key_metrics`, `conclusions`, `facts_count`, `deducted_count`, `views_count`, `citation_count`) per `contracts/output-frontmatter-schema.md`.
- **Snapshot synthesis**: after writing the deliverable, update the two-tier snapshot and classify findings as `[FACT]`/`[DEDUCTED]>-
Business model classification, business model analysis, structural analysis of how a company makes money, product offering decomposition, distribution channel analysis, customer segment analysis, revenue model identification, market sizing TAM SAM SOM, competitive positioning, business unit performance, management team & leadership analysis, what does the company sell, how does the company go to market, business model type platform service product, channel mix direct vs indirect, revenue concentration risk, CEO CFO executive backgrounds and changes
Competitive landscape analysis, competitor comparison, peer positioning, market share dynamics, competitive moat assessment, Porter five forces, industry competition, competitive advantage analysis, market positioning, strategic group mapping, compare competitors
Earnings sentiment analysis, analyst estimates vs guidance, earnings surprise history, consensus sentiment, earnings revision trends, analyst rating changes, earnings beat miss track record, guidance accuracy, whisper numbers, pre-announcement sentiment
Growth strategy analysis, organic growth decomposition, inorganic growth, M&A strategy, pipeline analysis, revenue growth drivers, strategic initiatives, expansion strategy, growth trajectory, product pipeline growth
Recent quarter performance analysis, quarterly earnings review, last quarter results, quarterly financial performance, analyze recent quarter, Q4 earnings, quarterly revenue breakdown, EPS this quarter, margin analysis recent quarter, sequential growth, quarterly performance review
Risk analysis, regulatory risk assessment, competitive risk, macro risk, technology risk, litigation risk, financial risk assessment, enterprise risk, operational risk, geopolitical risk exposure
Secular technology trends, technology adoption cycle, disruption risk, AI impact analysis, digital transformation, industry 4.0 trends, technology moat, innovation trajectory, R&D effectiveness, tech competitive positioning