talk-to-users
Run developer customer discovery via a Technical Advisory Board (TAB). Use when the user has never interviewed a user who isn't a friend, is inventing messaging from a conference room, or is guessing at the roadmap instead of hearing the pain firsthand.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIDevGTM/gtm-cofounder /tmp/talk-to-users && cp -r /tmp/talk-to-users/skills/03-talk-to-users ~/.claude/skills/talk-to-usersSKILL.md
# Talk to users (the TAB system) > The best marketing to developers comes from talking to developers. That's it. Everything else in this repo is downstream of this skill. **Use this when:** you've never done a real user interview, your messaging is clever but unverified, or you keep debating the roadmap internally instead of asking the people who feel the pain. ## The core idea Stand up a **Technical Advisory Board**: 30-50 people who *represent your users and buyers*, not grey-haired advisors telling you how to build. You interview them, on repeat, and let their words become your positioning, roadmap, and homepage copy. A TAB call is **not a demo and not a sales call.** It's an interview. You never mention the product. ## Framework: the TAB system (Frankl) **Composition** - One+ representative of *every persona that touches the product* (see `who-is-this-for`) - Both **users** (interact) and **customers** (pay), often different people - Target 30-50 members **Cadence** - 30 minutes · one-on-one · monthly · for ~6 months - Zoom, recorded with permission, never in person - Same questions every time · never pitch **Recruitment (it's a numbers game)** - Personalize every message, never batch-and-blast - Lead with *their* problem, not your startup - Max 4 sentences - ~10% reply → plan ~500 outreaches for ~50 members - No payment: early access, influence, swag Template: ``` Dear [Name], Your post about [specific problem] was genuinely sharp. I'm building something to attack [that problem] and I'd value your view. Would you consider joining my technical advisory board? If so, reply and I'll set up a short call to explain what's involved. ``` ## The 7 questions (never more than 7 in 30 min) 1. **Magic wand**: *"If you could wave a magic wand and change anything about how you do [task], what would it be?"* 2. **The stakes**: *"If we delivered that, how would it change your day / your work?"* 3. **Why now**: *"What's different about the world now that makes this more valuable than five years ago?"* 4. What caused this problem in your org? 5. What have you tried, and why did it fall short? 6. What happens if nothing changes for another year? 7. Where do you go to stay current on this? (who/what they trust) ## Analyze: turn transcripts into assets Highlight **complete sentences** (not fragments) into four buckets, then synthesize the top 3-5 of each, in the interviewee's exact words: | Bucket | You're mining for | |---|---| | **Pains** | bad outcomes, risks, obstacles | | **Gains** | outcomes they want | | **Jobs** | what they're trying to accomplish | | **Environmental changes** | trends making the pain worse over time → your **villain** | Those four buckets feed directly into `positioning-and-story` and `value-prop-that-converts`. ## Mistakes that look reasonable - **Interviewing friends**: they're nice and useless. You need people who'll say no. - **Pitching mid-interview**: the moment you demo, they start being polite instead of honest. - **Leading questions**: "wouldn't it be great if…" gets you the answer you fished for. - **Batch outreach**: a templated blast to 200 people gets 200 ignores. Personalize or don't send. - **Asking for solutions**: users are experts in their pain, not in your product. Mine the pain. ## Your next 30 minutes - [ ] List every persona from `who-is-this-for`; you need TAB members for each. - [ ] Find 10 people who've *publicly posted about the problem* (HN, Reddit, GitHub issues, X). - [ ] Send 10 personalized, 4-sentence, problem-first invites. Today. - [ ] Lock your 7 questions (3 above + 4 tailored). Do not exceed 7. - [ ] After 3 calls, fill the Pains/Gains/Jobs/Changes table with real quotes. --- Built from real dev-tool GTM experience, with frameworks from Adam Frankl (*The Developer-Facing Startup*) and Jakub Czakon (*markepear.dev*). When a framework can't make the call, that's what a human is for: [The DevTool GTM Company](https://thedevtoolgtmcompany.com).
Interview the user once and write a docs/gtm-cofounder/founder-brief.md that every other skill reads first, so the advice is about their real business, not a textbook. Use this before anything else, or whenever the agent lacks context on the user's product, ICP, market, or stage, or is giving generic GTM advice.
After the founder brief, turn it into an honest diagnosis and a prioritized, stage-aware GTM roadmap saved as docs/gtm-cofounder/gtm-roadmap.md. This is the hub the user returns to every session to see where they are and the single next move. Use right after start-here, whenever the user doesn't know what to work on next, wants a plan instead of a one-off task, or is drowning in disconnected tactics.
Define a real ICP and the developer personas in the sale. Use when the user says the product is \"for developers,\" can't name who would say no, or is marketing to whoever holds the budget instead of who actually adopts.
Build a positioning and narrative where the developer is the hero and a real trend is the villain. Use when the messaging describes the product instead of the problem, sounds like every competitor, or has no urgency because nothing is at stake.
Position an AI product when everyone claims AI and skeptics call it \"just a wrapper.\" Find the real wedge (data, workflow, trust, domain), make reliability the differentiator, answer \"won't the big labs just build this,\" and stop leading with \"AI-powered.\" Use when your AI or dev tool blends into a sea of similar demos, buyers doubt the accuracy, or you can't say why you win when the model is a commodity.
Write a developer value proposition that is specific, provable, and free of puffery. Use when the messaging leans on \"powerful,\" \"better,\" \"seamless,\" or \"best-in-class,\" when claims have no proof, or when the same line is supposed to reach both the developer and the buyer.
Structure a dev-tool homepage that converts developers into champions. Use when the landing page is written for the buyer instead of the developer, reads as salesy, buries what the product does, or makes it hard to start. Pairs with the ShipReady homepage audit.
Turn a curious developer into an activated one: the docs, the quickstart, and the first-run experience that gets them to their first real win fast, and back again. Use when people sign up or star the repo but never get it working, come once and never return, or you're about to pour traffic into a first-run that leaks.