Skill260 estrellas del repoactualizado 16d ago
competitive-intel
# competitive-intel This Claude Code skill provides a systematic framework for tracking and analyzing competitors across five layers: identification by threat tier, monitoring dimensions like product moves and pricing, analysis using SWOT and feature gaps, battlecard creation for sales, and win/loss analysis. Use it to maintain intelligence that informs strategic decisions about positioning, product development, and sales tactics without letting competitors dictate your agenda.
Instalar en Claude Code
Copiargit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills /tmp/competitive-intel && cp -r /tmp/competitive-intel/c-level-advisor/competitive-intel ~/.claude/skills/competitive-intelDespués abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.
Definición
SKILL.md
# Competitive Intelligence Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession -- intelligence that drives real decisions. Know competitors well enough to win against them. Do not let them set your agenda. ## Keywords competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy, market share, competitive advantage, moat, switching costs --- ## 5-Layer Intelligence System ### Layer 1: Competitor Identification #### Threat Classification Matrix | | Same ICP | Different ICP | |---|---|---| | **Same problem** | Direct threat (Tier 1) | Adjacent watch (Tier 2) | | **Different problem** | Displacement risk (Tier 2) | Monitor only (Tier 3) | #### Competitor Tiers | Tier | Definition | Tracking Intensity | Examples | |------|-----------|-------------------|---------| | 1: Direct | Same ICP, same problem, similar price | Monthly deep tracking | Your top 3 named competitors | | 2: Adjacent | Same budget, different solution approach | Quarterly review | Build-in-house, adjacent products | | 3: Future | Well-funded in adjacent space or incumbents with roadmap overlap | Semi-annual scan | Funded startups, big tech features | ### Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions | Dimension | Sources | Cadence | Priority | |-----------|---------|---------|----------| | Product moves | Changelog, G2, Capterra, Twitter, LinkedIn | Monthly | High | | Pricing changes | Pricing page, sales intel, customer feedback | Triggered | High | | Funding | Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn | Triggered | Medium | | Hiring signals | LinkedIn job postings, Indeed, Glassdoor | Monthly | Medium | | Partnerships | Press releases, co-marketing, integrations | Triggered | Medium | | Customer wins/losses | Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn | Monthly | High | | Customer losses (theirs) | G2 reviews, forums, your own inbound | Ongoing | High | | Messaging shifts | Homepage, ads, conference talks | Quarterly | Medium | ### Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks #### SWOT Per Competitor | Element | Key Questions | |---------|-------------| | Strengths | Where do they consistently win? What do customers praise? | | Weaknesses | Where do they lose? What do reviews complain about? | | Opportunities | What could they do that would threaten you more? | | Threats | What is their existential risk? What could make them irrelevant? | #### Feature Gap Analysis Template | Feature/Capability | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Status | |-------------------|-----|-------------|-------------|--------| | Core Feature 1 | [check] | [check] | [x] | Your advantage | | Core Feature 2 | [x] | [check] | [check] | Gap -- on roadmap? | | Feature 3 | [check] | [x] | [x] | Moat (unique to you) | | Feature 4 | [x] | [x] | [check] | Comp B only | | Feature 5 | [check] | [check] | [check] | Table stakes | #### Competitive Positioning Map Choose 2 axes that show YOUR differentiation: | Common Axis Pairs | When to Use | |------------------|------------| | Price vs. Feature Depth | When you compete on value | | Enterprise-ready vs. SMB-ready | When you serve a different segment | | Easy to Implement vs. Configurable | When implementation speed is your advantage | | Vertical-specific vs. Horizontal | When you specialize | ### Layer 4: Output Formats #### Battlecard Template (Sales Use) ``` BATTLECARD: [Competitor Name] Last Updated: [Date] OVERVIEW Company: [name, founded, HQ, funding, size] Product: [1-sentence description] ICP overlap: [High/Medium/Low] Threat level: [High/Medium/Low] WHY WE WIN 1. [Advantage 1 with proof point] 2. [Advantage 2 with proof point] 3. [Advantage 3 with proof point] WHERE THEY WIN 1. [Their advantage -- be honest] 2. [Their advantage] LANDMINES (what they say about us) - "[Their claim]" --> Counter: "[Your response with evidence]" - "[Their claim]" --> Counter: "[Your response with evidence]" KILLER QUESTIONS (ask the prospect) 1. "[Question that exposes competitor weakness]" 2. "[Question that highlights your strength]" 3. "[Question that validates your differentiation]" RECENT MOVES - [Date]: [What they did, what it means] CUSTOMER REFERENCES (ask for these) - [Customer name, use case, result] ``` #### Board Competitive Summary (Monthly) ``` COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY -- [Month] MARKET MOVEMENTS [Competitor A]: [What happened, significance] [Competitor B]: [What happened, significance] WIN/LOSS SNAPSHOT Win rate vs [Comp A]: [X]% (trend: [up/down/stable]) Win rate vs [Comp B]: [X]% (trend: [up/down/stable]) Top win reason: [reason] Top loss reason: [reason] RECOMMENDED RESPONSE [1 specific action with owner and timeline] RISK WATCH [Specific risk with probability and impact] ``` ### Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence | Cadence | Activity | Output | |---------|----------|--------| | Monthly (scheduled) | Review Tier 1 competitors, update battlecards | Updated battlecards + leadership summary | | Triggered (event) | Competitor raises funding, launches feature, changes pricing | Impact assessment within 48 hours | | Quarterly | Full landscape review, positioning map update | Board-ready competitive slide | | Annual | Add/remove tracked competitors, refresh threat assessment | Updated competitive strategy | --- ## Win/Loss Analysis ### When to Conduct | Event | Interview? | Who Conducts | |-------|-----------|-------------| | Lost deal > $50K ACV | Always | Non-AE (CS, product, or external) | | Churn > 6 months tenure | Always | CS or product team | | Competitive win | Selectively | Product or marketing | | Lost to "no decision" | Sample | Marketing or product | ### Interview Protocol | Order | Question | What You Learn | |-------|----------|---------------| | 1 | "Walk me through your evaluation process" | How they buy, who was involved | | 2 | "Who else were you considering?" | Competitive set from th
Del mismo repositorio
changelog-managerSubagent
>-
code-reviewerSubagent
>-
doc-generatorSubagent
>-
git-workflowSubagent
>-
qa-engineerSubagent
>-
security-auditorSubagent
>-
a11y-auditSlash Command
Run an accessibility audit on the current project for WCAG compliance.
code-to-prdSlash Command
Reverse-engineer a Product Requirements Document from existing code.