executing-plans
The executing-plans skill loads a written implementation plan, reviews it critically for feasibility concerns, executes all specified tasks with checkpoint reviews between each one, and reports completion status. Use this skill when operating in a separate session from plan creation and need structured task execution with built-in review gates to catch drift or emerging complexity issues before they compound.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GanyuanRan/Aegis /tmp/executing-plans && cp -r /tmp/executing-plans/skills/executing-plans ~/.claude/skills/executing-plansSKILL.md
# Executing Plans ## Overview Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan." **Note:** Tell your human partner that Aegis works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use aegis:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill. ## The Process ### Step 1: Load and Review Plan 1. Read plan file 2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan 3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting 4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed ### Step 1.5: Long-Task Checkpoint Setup If the plan has multiple tasks, may span sessions, or includes architecture / contract / workflow changes: 1. Announce: "I'm using the long-task-continuation skill to keep this plan checkpointed and drift-aware." 2. Load aegis:long-task-continuation. 3. Create the initial checkpoint from the plan: - current todo - active task - completed tasks - evidence refs - blockers - next step 4. Before each task, restate the current checkpoint. 5. After each task, update checkpoint, evidence refs, and drift check. ### Step 2: Execute Tasks For each task: 1. Mark as in_progress 2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps) 3. Before any non-trivial source edit, run the plan's `Pre-Edit Complexity Check` or create a compact one: Use `using-aegis/references/complexity-governance.md` for shared artifact classes, pressure signals, and `over-budget` handling. ```text Complexity Budget: - Artifact class: - Target files / artifacts: - Current pressure: - Projected post-change pressure: - Budget result: within-budget | at-risk | over-budget - Planned governance: Pre-Edit Complexity Check: - Safer edit boundary: - Decision: edit-in-place | extract helper | add owner file | split task | pause for plan update ``` If the check contradicts the plan's file boundary, pause and return to plan review instead of silently stuffing logic into an overloaded owner. If the budget result is `over-budget` and the task does not also govern that overrun, stop execution and return to plan review rather than pushing the task through as if it were still atomic. 4. Run verifications as specified 5. Update `TodoCheckpointDraft` and `DriftCheckDraft` before marking the task completed 6. Mark as completed ### Step 3: Complete Development After all tasks complete and verified: - Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work." - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use aegis:finishing-a-development-branch - Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice ## When to Stop and Ask for Help **STOP executing immediately when:** - Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear) - Plan has critical gaps preventing starting - You don't understand an instruction - Verification fails repeatedly **Ask for clarification rather than guessing.** ## When to Revisit Earlier Steps **Return to Review (Step 1) when:** - Partner updates the plan based on your feedback - Fundamental approach needs rethinking **Don't force through blockers** - stop and ask. ## Remember - Review plan critically first - Follow plan steps exactly - Don't skip verifications - Reference skills when plan says to - Stop when blocked, don't guess - Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent ## Integration **Required workflow skills:** - **aegis:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting - **aegis:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes - **aegis:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks
|
Deprecated - use the aegis:brainstorming skill instead
Deprecated - use the aegis:executing-plans skill instead
Deprecated - use the aegis:writing-plans skill instead
Use when retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or touching schema, persistence, or source-of-truth boundaries while deciding whether to delete old paths, retain compatibility, or stop for confirmation.
Use when defining new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or ambiguous medium/high-complexity work before implementation.
Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies