elixir-thinking
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement a feature in Elixir", "refactor this module", "should I use a GenServer here?", "how should I structure this?", "use the pipe operator", "add error handling", "make this concurrent", or mentions protocols, behaviours, pattern matching, with statements, comprehensions, structs, or coming from an OOP background. Contains paradigm-shifting insights.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir /tmp/elixir-thinking && cp -r /tmp/elixir-thinking/plugins/elixir/skills/elixir-thinking ~/.claude/skills/elixir-thinkingSKILL.md
# Elixir Thinking
Mental shifts required before writing Elixir. These contradict conventional OOP patterns.
## The Iron Law
```
NO PROCESS WITHOUT A RUNTIME REASON
```
Before creating a GenServer, Agent, or any process, answer YES to at least one:
1. Do I need mutable state persisting across calls?
2. Do I need concurrent execution?
3. Do I need fault isolation?
**All three are NO?** Use plain functions. Modules organize code; processes manage runtime.
## The Three Decoupled Dimensions
OOP couples behavior, state, and mutability together. Elixir decouples them:
| OOP Dimension | Elixir Equivalent |
|---------------|-------------------|
| Behavior | Modules (functions) |
| State | Data (structs, maps) |
| Mutability | Processes (GenServer) |
Pick only what you need. "I only need data and functions" = no process needed.
## "Let It Crash" = "Let It Heal"
The misconception: Write careless code.
The truth: Supervisors START processes.
- Handle expected errors explicitly (`{:ok, _}` / `{:error, _}`)
- Let unexpected errors crash → supervisor restarts
## Control Flow
**Pattern matching first:**
- Match on function heads instead of `if/else` or `case` in bodies
- `%{}` matches ANY map—use `map_size(map) == 0` guard for empty maps
- Avoid nested `case`—refactor to single `case`, `with`, or separate functions
**Error handling:**
- Use `{:ok, result}` / `{:error, reason}` for operations that can fail
- Avoid raising exceptions for control flow
- Use `with` for chaining `{:ok, _}` / `{:error, _}` operations
**Be explicit about expected cases:**
- Avoid `_ -> nil` catch-alls—they silently swallow unexpected cases
- Avoid `value && value.field` nil-punning—obscures actual return types
- When a case has `{:ok, nil} -> nil` alongside `{:ok, value} -> value.field`, use `with` instead:
```elixir
# Verbose
case get_run(id) do
{:ok, nil} -> nil
{:ok, run} -> run.recommendations
end
# Prefer
with {:ok, %{recommendations: recs}} <- get_run(id), do: recs
```
## Polymorphism
| For Polymorphism Over... | Use | Contract |
|--------------------------|-----|----------|
| Modules | Behaviors | Upfront callbacks |
| Data | Protocols | Upfront implementations |
| Processes | Message passing | Implicit (send/receive) |
**Behaviors** = default for module polymorphism (very cheap at runtime)
**Protocols** = only when composing data types, especially built-ins
**Message passing** = only when stateful by design (IO, file handles)
Use the simplest abstraction: pattern matching → anonymous functions → behaviors → protocols → message passing. Each step adds complexity.
**When justified:** Library extensibility, multiple implementations, test swapping.
**When to stay coupled:** Internal module, single implementation, pattern matching handles all cases.
## Data Modeling Replaces Class Hierarchies
OOP: Complex class hierarchy + visitor pattern.
Elixir: Model as data + pattern matching + recursion.
```elixir
{:sequence, {:literal, "rain"}, {:repeat, {:alternation, "dogs", "cats"}}}
def interpret({:literal, text}, input), do: ...
def interpret({:sequence, left, right}, input), do: ...
def interpret({:repeat, pattern}, input), do: ...
```
## Defaults and Options
Use `/3` variants (`Keyword.get/3`, `Map.get/3`) instead of case statements branching on `nil`:
```elixir
# WRONG
case Keyword.get(opts, :chunker) do
nil -> chunker()
config -> parse_chunker_config(config)
end
# RIGHT
Keyword.get(opts, :chunker, :default) |> parse_chunker_config()
```
Don't create helper functions to merge config defaults. Inline the fallback:
```elixir
# WRONG
defp merge_defaults(opts), do: Keyword.merge([repo: Application.get_env(:app, :repo)], opts)
# RIGHT
def some_function(opts) do
repo = opts[:repo] || Application.get_env(:app, :repo)
end
```
## Idioms
- Process dictionary is typically unidiomatic—pass state explicitly
- Reserve `is_thing` names for guards only
- Use structs over maps when shape is known: `defstruct [:name, :age]`
- Prepend to lists `[new | list]` not `list ++ [new]`
- Use `dbg/1` for debugging—prints formatted value with context
- Use built-in `JSON` module (Elixir 1.18+) instead of Jason
## Testing
**Always prefix `mix` commands with `unbuffer`** to get ANSI colors and prevent stdout block-buffering in non-TTY environments (e.g. `unbuffer mix test`). Install: `brew install expect` (macOS) or `apt install expect` (Linux).
**Prefer pattern matching over imperative assertions.** Never use `assert length` + `Enum.at`/`List.last`/`hd`. Pattern match checks length and content in one shot:
```elixir
# Bad
assert length(students) == 2
assert Enum.at(students, 0).name == "Alice"
assert Enum.at(students, 1).name == "Bob"
# Good
assert [%{name: "Alice"}, %{name: "Bob"}] = students
```
Same goes for type-only predicates: `assert is_map(user)` / `assert is_list(posts)` pass for almost any non-error return. Pattern match the shape and content together: `assert %User{email: "a@b.com"} = user`. `is_nil/1` is fine when nil-ness is the whole point.
**Test behavior, not implementation.** Test use cases / public API. Refactoring shouldn't break tests.
**Test your code, not the framework.** If deleting your code doesn't fail the test, it's tautological.
**Keep tests async.** `async: false` means you've coupled to global state. Fix the coupling:
| Problem | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| `Application.put_env` | Pass config as function argument |
| Feature flags | Inject via process dictionary or context |
| ETS tables | Create per-test tables with unique names |
| External APIs | Use Mox with explicit allowances |
| File system operations | Use `@tag :tmp_dir` (see below) |
**Use `tmp_dir` for file tests.** ExUnit creates unique temp directories per test, async-safe:
```elixir
@tag :tmp_dir
test "writes file", %{tmp_dir: tmp_dir} do
path = Path.join(tmp_dir, "test.txt")
File.write!(path, "content")
assert File.read!(path) == "content"
end
```
Directory is auto-cleaned before each run.This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a database table", "create a new context", "query the database", "add a field to a schema", "validate form input", "fix N+1 queries", "preload this association", "separate these concerns", or mentions Repo, changesets, migrations, Ecto.Multi, has_many, belongs_to, transactions, query composition, or how contexts should talk to each other.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a background job", "process async", "schedule a task", "retry failed jobs", "add email sending", "run this later", "add a cron job", "unique jobs", "batch process", or mentions Oban, Oban Pro, workflows, job queues, cascades, grafting, recorded values, job args, or troubleshooting job failures.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add background processing", "cache this data", "run this async", "handle concurrent requests", "manage state across requests", "process jobs from a queue", "this GenServer is slow", or mentions GenServer, Supervisor, Agent, Task, Registry, DynamicSupervisor, handle_call, handle_cast, supervision trees, fault tolerance, "let it crash", or choosing between Broadway and Oban.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a LiveView page", "create a form", "handle real-time updates", "broadcast changes to users", "add a new route", "create an API endpoint", "fix this LiveView bug", "why is mount called twice?", or mentions handle_event, handle_info, handle_params, mount, channels, controllers, components, assigns, sockets, or PubSub. Covers where to load data (mount vs handle_params) and the LiveView lifecycle.
This skill should be used when the user works on any .ex or .exs file, mentions Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto/OTP, the project has a mix.exs, or asks "which skill should I use", "new to Elixir", "help with Elixir". Routes to the correct thinking skill BEFORE exploring code. Triggers on "implement", "add", "fix", "refactor" in Elixir projects.