Skill58 estrellas del repoactualizado 1mo ago
evolutionary-naming
Use when refactoring code with poor names, when asked to improve naming, or when a user struggles to name a class/method/variable. Symptoms include -Manager/-Util suffixes, single-letter variables, process/handle/do verbs, primitive obsession, god methods with multiple responsibilities. Two modes — audit (broad scan, list opportunities) and improve (walk one specific identifier through the process).
Instalar en Claude Code
Copiargit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kawasima/evolutionary-naming /tmp/evolutionary-naming && cp -r /tmp/evolutionary-naming/skills/evolutionary-naming ~/.claude/skills/evolutionary-namingDespués abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.
Definición
SKILL.md
# Evolutionary Naming
## Overview
**Naming is a process, not a single step.** Names evolve through 7 progressive steps grouped into 3 phases. Match the depth of work to the user's actual story — don't run the full pipeline every time.
**This skill is advisory.** It reads code and *proposes* renames, transitions, and the commit message you'd write for each — it does not edit files or run git. The user applies the changes. Phrase every transition as a proposal, and suggest the commit message they would use, rather than claiming the rename is done.
Based on Arlo Belshee's "Naming as a Process" (CC BY 3.0). Updated edition: digdeeproots.com.
## The Three Phases
| Phase | Steps | Nature |
|-------|-------|--------|
| **Phase 1: Insight → Name** | Missing → Nonsense → Honest → Honest and Complete | Universal. Pure naming. No structural change. Safe to walk continuously. |
| **Phase 2: Name → Structure** | Honest and Complete → Does the Right Thing | Codebase-specific. Requires structural refactoring. **Ask permission.** |
| **Phase 3: Combine for Design** | Does the Right Thing → Intent → Domain Abstraction | Requires reading call sites and domain context. **Ask permission.** |
## Choose Your Mode
This skill operates in two modes. Pick the one that matches the user's request.
| User signal | Mode | File |
|-------------|------|------|
| Specific identifier named ("`d` を改善", "DocumentManager をどうにか", "this method") | **improve-mode** | `improve-mode.md` |
| One clear target inside a code block + "リファクタリング" / "改善" | **improve-mode** | `improve-mode.md` |
| "全体の命名を見直したい", "改善余地ある?", "命名レビュー", "scan", "audit", "リストだけほしい" | **audit-mode** | `audit-mode.md` |
| Audit followup: "X だけ直して" after audit output | **improve-mode** (target = X) | `improve-mode.md` |
| Ambiguous (large code paste, no specific target, no "全体" language) | **Ask the user**: "全体を監査しますか、特定の識別子を改善しますか?" |
**Mode = audit:** Read `audit-mode.md`. Produce a structured table of all naming opportunities. Do not execute changes.
**Mode = improve:** Read `improve-mode.md`. Walk one identifier through phase transitions. Pause at phase boundaries.
Both modes share diagnostic criteria, transition mechanics, and red flags from `reference.md`.
## When to Stop
How far to walk depends on the user's depth signal. The canonical signal → stop-at table lives in `reference.md` ("Depth Signals — How Far to Walk"); both modes read from it.
> "You take the minimum steps to get the name to meet your need for the current story." — leaving names incomplete for colleagues to extend is a feature, not a flaw.
## Files in This Skill
- `SKILL.md` — this file. Router and overview.
- `reference.md` — shared 7-step diagnosis table, transitions, red flags, applesauce/probably_/AndStuff guidance.
- `audit-mode.md` — exhaustive scan workflow + output template.
- `improve-mode.md` — interactive single-target workflow + pause protocol.
Read the mode file you selected, plus `reference.md` for diagnosis details.