dev-architecture-playbook
Route full software-development architecture work from product intent through design, implementation, testing, release, and operations. Use when the user asks for a complete development architecture, wants to know which Spellbook skills to combine, needs an execution path across PRD/spec/API/data/security/performance/release/SRE, or asks to turn an idea or repo into a production-ready engineering plan.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook /tmp/dev-architecture-playbook && cp -r /tmp/dev-architecture-playbook/skills/dev-architecture-playbook ~/.claude/skills/dev-architecture-playbookSKILL.md
# Dev Architecture Playbook ## Purpose Use this as the lifecycle router before starting broad product or architecture work. It chooses the minimum useful skill chain, defines gates, and prevents starting implementation before the required contracts exist. ## Route Classify the request first: | Request | Primary Skills | Output | |---|---|---| | Idea, product direction, or market/user problem | `product-discovery`, `prd-master` | Product brief, user stories, success metrics | | Architecture or module boundaries | `architecture-foundation`, `technical-spec`, `elegant-architecture` | Architecture spec, boundaries, rejected alternatives | | API, auth, data, or schema contract | `api-design`, `auth-security`, `database-patterns`, `data-contract-migrations` | Versioned contracts and migration plan | | UI/product surface | `frontend-design`, `ui-ux-pro-max`, `ui-design-system`, `playwright-automation` | UX flow, component plan, visual checks | | Implementation workflow | `flowguard`, `threads`, `systematic-debugging`, `comprehensive-testing` | Bounded execution, ownership, root-cause debugging, and verification | | Quality and regression risk | `comprehensive-testing`, `codebase-audit`, `vibeguard`, `project-health-auditor` | Test matrix and risk list | | Release and operations | `release-engineering`, `config-secrets-environments`, `performance-capacity`, `incident-slo-runbook`, `observability-sre`, `devops-excellence` | Rollout, config, capacity, SLO, runbook | ## Required Gates Do not treat the architecture as complete until these gates are explicit: 1. Goal and non-goals. 2. Domain model and ownership boundaries. 3. External API, data, and config contracts. 4. Security and permission model. 5. Test strategy with command-level verification. 6. Release, rollback, and migration gates. 7. Observability, SLO, and incident response. If a gate is irrelevant, state why. Do not silently skip data, security, or rollback gates for production systems. ## Execution Pattern Use this sequence for greenfield or major refactors: 1. Product: write the product brief or PRD. 2. Architecture: define modules, runtime boundaries, and tradeoffs. 3. Contracts: define API, data, config, and security contracts. 4. Plan: split work into independently verifiable steps. 5. Implement: use one workflow skill per step, not every skill at once. 6. Verify: run build, typecheck, tests, and focused behavioral checks. 7. Release: define rollout, migration, rollback, monitoring, and support owner. For existing repos, start with `repo-agent-context-audit` or `codebase-audit` before proposing new structure. ## Output Shape Return a compact plan: ```text goal: context: selected_skill_chain: architecture_gates: implementation_steps: verification_commands: release_and_ops_gates: open_risks: ``` Prefer the smallest chain that covers the risk. Too many skills at once usually means the scope needs to be split.
Audit AND optimize a CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md instruction file — score it against the five high-leverage patterns, flag anti-patterns, then apply approved fixes in place. Use when the user says 优化 CLAUDE.md / 优化 AGENTS.md / optimize my agent doc / 帮我改 claudemd, or after an audit when they want the fixes applied (not just reported).
Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.
REST/GraphQL/gRPC API design best practices. Use when designing APIs, defining contracts, handling versioning. Covers OpenAPI 3.2, GraphQL Federation, gRPC streaming.
Mobile app UI design expert for iOS and Android. Use when designing app interfaces, creating design systems, ensuring accessibility, or following platform guidelines. Covers Material Design 3, Human Interface Guidelines, color theory, typography, and 2025 trends.
End-to-end app feature inventory and user-story testing workflow with a canonical tracker. Use when the user asks to audit every feature, derive expected behavior from code, test user journeys, or explicitly fix and retest documented UX or logistical defects.
Design architecture foundations before implementation. Use when asked to design or refactor architecture, choose Rust/Go crate, package, module, runtime, workflow, or service boundaries, compare mature project architecture, prevent stacked one-off PRs, audit migration debt in existing repos, or produce a spec before coding.
Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.
Ask Grok or Gemini via opencli (browser-session based, no API cost). Use when the user says "问 grok", "问 gemini", "ask grok", "ask gemini", "用 grok 查", "grok 怎么看", "让 gemini 分析", or wants a second opinion from Grok/Gemini without paying API tokens. Routes to opencli which drives the already-logged-in Chrome session.