all-hands-deck
Build an all-hands that lands with everyone from intern to VP — the mixed-altitude structure (the story for all, the numbers for some), the wins-with-names section done right, the hard-news slide handled straight, and the Q&A design that gets real questions. Use when asked build the all-hands deck, make the monthly town hall not boring, how do we share the numbers with everyone, or announce this change at all-hands. Produces the segment structure, the altitude-mixed content rules, the hard-news handling, and the Q&A mechanics.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills /tmp/all-hands-deck && cp -r /tmp/all-hands-deck/exports/openclaw/all-hands-deck ~/.claude/skills/all-hands-deckSKILL.md
# All Hands Deck Skill
The all-hands serves the widest audience in the company — new hires and executives, engineers and sales, the anxious and the checked-out — and decks built for any single altitude lose the rest: pure strategy bores the floor, pure metrics baffle the new, pure celebration reads as evasion in a hard quarter. The working structure mixes altitudes deliberately (the story everyone follows, the numbers that keep trust, the wins with *names*, the hard news handled straight), and treats the Q&A as a designed segment — because the questions people actually have determine what the meeting was *about*, whatever the slides said.
## What This Skill Produces
- **The segment structure** — the recurring skeleton: the narrative open, numbers, wins-with-names, the focus segment, hard news when owed, Q&A
- **The altitude rules** — per segment: what the newest hire needs vs. what the veterans check
- **The hard-news handling** — straight, early, with the what-it-means-for-you answered before it's asked
- **The Q&A mechanics** — pre-submitted + live, the no-softball discipline, and the answer-or-commit rule
## Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- **The month's material** — the numbers, the wins, the news (including the uncomfortable); the deck is assembled from reality, and the temptation to skip the bad month is the trust-killer to resist
- **The company's current mood** — post-layoff, post-win, mid-uncertainty; the structure holds but the emphasis calibrates (anxious companies need the hard-news slide *more* prominent, not less)
- **The metrics that recur** — the same 4–6 every time ([kpi-tracker-design](../kpi-tracker-design/SKILL.md) discipline: trends visible, definitions stable), because rotating metrics read as narrative management
- **The Q&A history** — what got asked last time, what went unanswered; unanswered questions compound
## Framework: The Structure Rules
1. **Open with the story, one slide:** the month in one narrative sentence ("we shipped the platform bet and paid for it in support load — here's both") — the frame everyone, at every altitude, carries through the numbers. Openings that jump to dashboards ask the floor to build their own narrative, and they build worse ones.
2. **The same numbers, trended, every time:** the recurring 4–6 metrics with their history visible ([data-slide-design](../data-slide-design/SKILL.md) rules) — consistency is the trust mechanism; a metric that vanishes the month it dipped teaches everyone to read absences. Down months get shown *with the same prominence* and one honest sentence of why.
3. **Wins carry names, and names rotate:** specific work by specific people ("the checkout rewrite — Ana, Jorge, and the platform team — cut latency 40%") — the recognition segment is half the meeting's retention value, and the rotation audit (who *hasn't* been named lately?) keeps it from becoming the same five people's highlight reel.
4. **Hard news goes early and straight:** the miss, the departure, the change — stated plainly in the deck's first half ([changelog-for-humans](../changelog-for-humans/SKILL.md) breaking-first logic), with the what-it-means-for-you slide answering the question every seat is silently asking. Bad news buried at slide 30, or worse left for Q&A extraction, converts one bad fact into a credibility debt.
5. **Q&A is designed, not appended:** pre-submitted questions (anonymous channel — the real ones need cover) mixed with live, the hardest pre-submitted question *taken first* (the signal that the segment is real), and the answer-or-commit rule: every question gets an answer or a named owner and date ("I don't know — [name] will post the answer by Friday"). The unanswered-question log is next month's open.
## Output Format
# All-Hands: [month] — [T] min
## The Structure
| Segment | Content | Altitude notes | Min |
|---|---|---|---|
[Story open (1 slide) · Numbers (the standing 4–6, trended) · Wins (names, rotated) · Focus topic · Hard news (early, if owed) · Q&A (designed)]
## Hard News Handling (when present)
[The plain statement · the what-it-means-for-you slide · placed at segment [early]]
## Q&A Mechanics
[The anonymous pre-submit channel · hardest-first rule · answer-or-commit with owners · last month's open questions, answered]
## Quality Checks
- [ ] The open is one narrative sentence, not a dashboard
- [ ] The metrics are the standing set, trended, shown in down months at full prominence
- [ ] Wins name people, and the rotation was checked
- [ ] Hard news appears early with the for-you slide
- [ ] Q&A takes the hardest pre-submitted question first, and last month's commits were honored
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not rotate metrics by convenience — the vanishing-metric tell reads louder than any bad number
- [ ] Do not celebrate through a hard month — the floor already knows; festivity reads as distance
- [ ] Do not thank "the whole team" generically — names or it's wallpaper
- [ ] Do not soften Q&A by selection — cherry-picked softballs teach people to stop submitting
- [ ] Do not leave commits unhonored — one forgotten "we'll get back to you" discounts every future oneDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.
Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.
Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
Plan a trip that actually works with a disability or access need — confirm real accessibility (not just 'accessible' labels), book the assistance in advance, plan for equipment and medication, and build in the contingencies for when access breaks down. Use when someone says 'plan an accessible trip', 'travelling with a wheelchair/disability', 'book assistance for my flight', or 'will this hotel actually work for me'. Produces an access-verified itinerary, an assistance-booking checklist, an equipment/medication plan, and contingency scripts. Verify specifics with providers.
Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.
Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.