analyzing-heap-spray-exploitation
This skill provides structured procedures for detecting heap spray exploitation artifacts in memory forensics investigations using Volatility3 framework. Use it when analyzing memory dumps to identify suspicious heap allocations, NOP sled patterns, and injected shellcode, or when building detection rules and threat hunting queries for heap spray attacks during incident response and security monitoring validation.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills /tmp/analyzing-heap-spray-exploitation && cp -r /tmp/analyzing-heap-spray-exploitation/skills/analyzing-heap-spray-exploitation ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-heap-spray-exploitationSKILL.md
# Analyzing Heap Spray Exploitation ## Overview Heap spraying is an exploitation technique that fills large regions of a process's heap with attacker-controlled data (typically NOP sleds followed by shellcode) to increase the reliability of code execution exploits. This skill covers detecting heap spray artifacts in memory dumps using Volatility3's malfind, vadinfo, and memmap plugins, identifying suspicious contiguous memory allocations, scanning for NOP sled patterns (0x90, 0x0c0c0c0c), and extracting embedded shellcode for analysis. ## When to Use - When investigating security incidents that require analyzing heap spray exploitation - When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain - When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type - When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques ## Prerequisites - Python 3.9+ with `volatility3` framework installed - Memory dump file (.raw, .vmem, .dmp format) - Understanding of virtual memory layout and VAD (Virtual Address Descriptor) trees - Familiarity with common shellcode patterns and NOP sled encodings ## Steps ### Step 1: Identify Suspicious Processes Use Volatility3 windows.malfind to scan for processes with executable injected memory regions. ### Step 2: Analyze VAD Entries Examine VAD tree entries using windows.vadinfo for large contiguous allocations with RWX permissions. ### Step 3: Scan for NOP Sled Patterns Search suspicious memory regions for NOP sled signatures (0x90 sequences, 0x0c0c0c0c patterns). ### Step 4: Extract and Analyze Shellcode Dump suspicious memory regions and identify shellcode using byte pattern analysis. ## Expected Output JSON report with suspicious processes, heap spray indicators, NOP sled locations, memory region sizes, and extracted shellcode hashes.
Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query