adr-plan
Analyze a task and produce an Architecture Decision Record with implementation steps.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NikiforovAll/claude-code-rules /tmp/adr-plan && cp -r /tmp/adr-plan/plugins/handbook-team-stack/skills/adr-plan ~/.claude/skills/adr-planSKILL.md
# ADR Plan: Task Analysis → Architecture Decision Record Analyze a task, explore the codebase, and produce an ADR with concrete implementation steps. ## Phase 1: Analyze 1. Read the task description, active plan, or task list 2. Explore affected areas of the codebase — do it concurrently for independent modules 3. Map blast radius — search for consumers of functions/types/routes being changed 4. Identify alternatives worth considering (at least 2) Do this silently. ## Phase 2: Detect ADR Setup Check if the project has an ADR directory: ``` ls docs/adr/ || ls adr/ || ls doc/adr/ ``` - **Found** → use existing directory, detect next number from existing files - **Not found** → run `npx adr init en`, then proceed ## Phase 3: Produce ADR Content Write the ADR using `npx adr new "<title>"`, then edit the generated file with the following structure: ```markdown # ADR-NNNN: [Title] ## Status Proposed ## Context [What problem are we solving? What constraints exist?] ## Decision [What we chose and why] ## Alternatives Considered | Option | Pros | Cons | |--------|------|------| | ... | ... | ... | ## Implementation Steps ### Step 1: [Description] - **Files:** [files to create/modify] - **Depends on:** [previous step or "none"] - **Done when:** [concrete acceptance criteria] ### Step 2: [Description] ... ## Consequences - [Positive and negative outcomes, tradeoffs accepted] ``` ### Guidelines - **Steps are ordered by dependency** — each step lists what it depends on - **Steps are parallelizable when independent** — note which steps can run concurrently - **Each step has concrete "done when" criteria** — no vague outcomes - **Alternatives table is honest** — include the option you chose and why others lost - Keep it short. 1-2 pages max. No padding. ## Phase 4: Present to User Show the ADR content and the file path. The user may: - **Approve** → ADR stays as-is - **Adjust** → edit and re-present - **Cancel** → delete the file ## Important - The ADR is a planning artifact, not documentation for posterity - Steps should map naturally to work units (a team member could own one or more steps) - If the task is too simple for an ADR (single file, obvious fix), say so and skip - Do not write implementation code — this is planning only
This skill automates version bumping during the release process for the Claude Code Handbook monorepo. It should be used when the user requests to bump versions, prepare a release, or increment version numbers across the repository.
This skill should be used when the user wants to add components (commands, agents, skills, hooks, or MCP servers) to the Component Reference section of the website.
Guide spec-driven development workflow (Requirements → Design → Tasks → Implementation) with approval gates between phases. Use when user wants structured feature planning or says "use spec-driven" or "follow the spec process".
Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency using three parallel disposable subagents. This skill should be used when the user says "review", "simplify", "code review", or wants a one-shot code review without persistent reviewers.
Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency using a team of persistent named reviewers. This skill should be used when the user says "team review", "review with team", or wants parallel code review with persistent team members for follow-up questions. Similar to /subagent-review but reviewers persist after review.
This skill should be used when users want to discover, browse, or audit cc-handbook marketplace plugins. Shows all available plugins with installation status, versions, and component breakdown (skills, agents, commands, MCP/LSP servers, hooks). Trigger phrases include "discover plugins", "list handbook plugins", "what plugins are available", "browse marketplace".
Generate a .NET code coverage report scoped to files changed in the current branch. Runs tests with coverage collection and produces filtered HTML reports.
This skill should be used when investigating .NET project dependencies, understanding why packages are included, listing references, or auditing for outdated/vulnerable packages.