Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill542 estrellas del repoactualizado 2d ago

nw-execute

The nw-execute skill dispatches a single roadmap step from a feature's delivery pipeline to a specialized agent for test-driven development execution. Use it to atomically execute one unit of work through the configured TDD cycle (typically RED, GREEN, COMMIT phases), with the agent recording all phase events to execution-log.json while respecting the rigor profile settings for model selection and phase configuration.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave /tmp/nw-execute && cp -r /tmp/nw-execute/nWave/skills/nw-execute ~/.claude/skills/nw-execute
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

SKILL.md

# NW-EXECUTE: Atomic Task Execution

**Wave**: EXECUTION_WAVE | **Agent**: Dispatched agent (specified by caller)

## Overview

Dispatch one unit of DELIVER work to an agent: a single roadmap step. `/nw-execute` extracts the step from `roadmap.json` and dispatches it for the 3-phase TDD canon; the agent appends phase events to `execution-log.json`.

## Syntax

```
/nw-execute @{agent} "{feature-id}" "{step-id}"
```

## Context Files Required

- `docs/feature/{feature-id}/deliver/roadmap.json` — Orchestrator reads once, extracts step context
- `docs/feature/{feature-id}/deliver/execution-log.json` — Agent appends only (never reads)

## Rigor Profile Integration

Before dispatching the agent, read rigor config from `.nwave/des-config.json` (key: `rigor`). If absent, use standard defaults.

- **`agent_model`**: Pass as `model` parameter to Agent tool. If `"inherit"`, omit `model` (inherits from session).
- **`tdd_phases`**: Modify the TDD_PHASES section in the DES template to match the configured phases. The 3-phase canon (ADR-025) is `[RED, GREEN, COMMIT]`; the lean variant is `[RED, GREEN]`. Legacy 5-phase contract (`[PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT]`) and its lean variant (`[RED_UNIT, GREEN]`) remain supported for audit-log replay of pre-2026-05-07 commits. Remove omitted phases' instructions from the template.
- **`refactor_pass`**: If `false`, skip COMMIT phase refactoring instructions.

## Dispatcher Workflow

1. **Parse Parameters** — Extract agent name, feature ID, and step ID from invocation. Gate: all three parameters present and non-empty.
2. **Load Rigor Profile** — Read `.nwave/des-config.json` key `rigor` (default: standard if absent). Gate: config loaded or default applied.
3. **Validate Context Files** — Confirm `roadmap.json` and `execution-log.json` exist under `docs/feature/{feature-id}/deliver/`. Gate: both files present; report path-not-found if missing.
4. **Extract Step Context** — Grep roadmap for `step_id: "{step-id}"` with ~50 lines context. Gate: step found; report available step IDs if missing.
5. **Invoke Agent** — Call Agent tool with DES template below, applying rigor model and phases from step 2. Gate: Agent tool called, not executed inline.

## Agent Invocation

@{agent}

Use this DES template verbatim. Fill `{placeholders}` from roadmap. Without DES markers, hooks cannot validate.

```
<!-- DES-VALIDATION : required -->
<!-- DES-PROJECT-ID : {feature-id} -->
<!-- DES-STEP-ID : {step-id} -->

# DES_METADATA
Step: {step-id}
Feature: {feature-id}
Command: /nw-execute

# AGENT_IDENTITY
Agent: {agent-name}

# SKILL_LOADING
Before starting TDD phases, read your skill files for methodology guidance.
Skills path: ~/.claude/skills/nw-{skill-name}/SKILL.md
Always load before RED: tdd-methodology.md, quality-framework.md (3-phase canon, ADR-025) — legacy 5-phase logs reference loading at PREPARE.
Load on-demand per phase as specified in your Skill Loading Strategy table.

# TASK_CONTEXT
{step context from roadmap - name|criteria|test_file|scenario_name|implementation_notes|deps|files_to_modify (per nWave/templates/roadmap-schema.json)}

# DESIGN_CONTEXT
{Summary of architectural decisions relevant to this step, extracted by the orchestrator from docs/product/architecture/brief.md and wave-decisions.md. Include: component structure, dependency boundaries, technology choices, and any design constraints that affect implementation. If no design artifacts exist, write "No design artifacts available — use project conventions."}

# TDD_PHASES
3-phase canon (ADR-025, 2026-05-07). Execute in order:

1. RED - Activate the pre-authored acceptance test (PRIMARY TBU DEFENSE); write PBT unit tests ONLY if the AT cannot reach GREEN without them.
   AT activation: If TASK_CONTEXT includes test_file, locate it and remove the @skip/@ignore/@pending/xit/.skip/[Ignore] marker from the target scenario (the AT scaffold was authored by DISTILL — DELIVER does NOT re-author ATs). Run it — must fail for business logic reason (not import/syntax error). Fail-for-right-reason gate: collected ≥ 1, failures ≥ 1, no collection errors, semantic AssertionError / expected-exception-not-thrown.
   PORT-TO-PORT PRINCIPLE: The acceptance test exercises the scenario through
   the driving port (application service, orchestrator, CLI handler, API controller),
   not a decomposed helper or internal class. A correctly-written port-to-port test
   makes TBU structurally impossible — if a new function were missing or unwired,
   THIS test stays RED. That is the entire point: GREEN is unreachable without wiring.
   Litmus test: "If I delete the call-site that wires the new code, does this test fail?"
   If no → the test is at the wrong level. Stop and flag to orchestrator (DISTILL re-author needed).
   Conditional unit-test authoring: write PBT unit tests (or integration tests for adapter/infrastructure code — adapters use real infrastructure, never mocked unit tests) ONLY when the AT requires them to reach GREEN. If the AT can pass via direct minimal implementation, skip unit-test authoring inside RED.

2. GREEN - Minimal code to pass AT + any unit tests authored in RED.
   After GREEN: run FULL test suite. If all pass, proceed to COMMIT immediately.
   Smell test: if any new function is only called from test code, your acceptance
   test is at the wrong abstraction level — stop and flag.
   Never move to new task or stop without committing green code.

3. COMMIT - Stage and commit with conventional message.
   Include git trailer: `Step-Id: {step-id}` (required for DES verification)
   Example:
   ```
   feat(feature-id): implement feature X

   Step-Id: 02-01
   ```

LEGACY 5-PHASE CONTRACT (ADR-024 era, pre-2026-05-07): PREPARE → RED_ACCEPTANCE → RED_UNIT → GREEN → COMMIT. Preserved for audit-log replay only — new work uses the 3-phase canon above. Audit-log entries referencing RED_ACCEPTANCE/RED_UNIT/PREPARE represent merged sub-steps now folded into RED.

# QUALITY_GATES
- All tests pass
nw-ab-critique-dimensionsSkill

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

nw-abr-critique-dimensionsSkill

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

nw-ad-critique-dimensionsSkill

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

nw-agent-creation-workflowSkill

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

nw-agent-testingSkill

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

nw-architectural-styles-tradeoffsSkill

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

nw-architecture-patternsSkill

Comprehensive architecture patterns, methodologies, quality frameworks, and evaluation methods for solution architects. Load when designing system architecture or selecting patterns.

nw-at-completeness-checkSkill

Canonical AT completeness gate — research-anchored 7-category taxonomy (C1-C7) + 15-item mechanical checklist. Paradigm-neutral. Drives acceptance-designer reviewer verdict deterministically.