nw-fast-forward
The nw-fast-forward skill orchestrates sequential execution of remaining nWave development waves, DISCUSS, DESIGN, DEVOPS, DISTILL, and DELIVER, without pausing for review between stages. Use this when you have confirmed requirements and need to accelerate from your current project state through final delivery, automatically detecting progress and running each wave by invoking its task file. The DISCOVER wave is skipped by default since it requires interactive customer input.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave /tmp/nw-fast-forward && cp -r /tmp/nw-fast-forward/nWave/skills/nw-fast-forward ~/.claude/skills/nw-fast-forwardSKILL.md
# NW-FAST-FORWARD: Fast-Forward
**Wave**: CROSS_WAVE (entry point) | **Agent**: Main Instance (self — orchestrator) | **Command**: `/nw-fast-forward`
## Overview
Chains remaining waves end-to-end after single user confirmation. Detects current progress (like `/nw-continue`), shows planned sequence, runs each wave automatically — DISCUSS > DESIGN > DEVOPS > DISTILL > DELIVER — without stopping between waves.
You (main Claude instance) run this orchestration directly. Each wave invoked by reading its task file.
**DISCOVER skipped by default** — requires interactive customer interview data that cannot be auto-generated. Use `--from=discover` to include.
## Behavior Flow
### Step 1: Input Parsing
Accept: feature description (new project)|`--from` flag with optional feature ID|no arguments (auto-detect from `docs/feature/`)
### Step 2: Project Resolution
**New project (description provided):** Derive feature ID per `~/.claude/nWave/skills/common/wizard-shared-rules.md` (Feature ID Derivation). Show derived ID, allow override via AskUserQuestion. Create `docs/feature/{feature-id}/`.
**Existing project (no description):** Scan `docs/feature/` (same as `/nw-continue` Step 1-2). If multiple, ask user to select.
### Step 3: Detect Current Progress
Check wave artifacts using Wave Detection Rules in `~/.claude/nWave/skills/common/wizard-shared-rules.md`.
### Step 4: Determine Wave Sequence
Default order (DISCOVER skipped): DISCUSS > DESIGN > DEVOPS > DISTILL > DELIVER
**With `--from` flag:** Validate prerequisite artifacts exist. If missing: "Cannot start from {wave} — {missing} artifacts missing. Run `/nw-continue` to fill the gap." Start from specified wave.
**Without `--from`:** Find first incomplete wave, start from there.
### Step 5: Show Plan and Confirm
```
Feature: {feature-id}
Fast-forward plan:
1. DISCUSS — Define requirements and user stories
2. DESIGN — Architecture and technology selection
3. DEVOPS — Platform and infrastructure readiness
4. DISTILL — Acceptance tests (Given-When-Then)
5. DELIVER — TDD implementation
This will run all 5 waves without stopping for review.
```
If some waves complete, show as skipped:
```
Fast-forward plan:
✓ DISCUSS — complete
✓ DESIGN — complete
1. DEVOPS — Platform and infrastructure readiness
2. DISTILL — Acceptance tests (Given-When-Then)
3. DELIVER — TDD implementation
3 waves will execute without stopping.
```
One-time confirmation via AskUserQuestion.
### Step 6: Sequential Execution
For each wave:
1. Read task file (`nWave/tasks/nw/{wave}.md`)
2. Follow instructions — invoke appropriate agent via Task tool
3. Wait for completion
4. Verify output artifacts exist (wave detection rules)
5. Missing artifacts after wave = failure
6. Proceed to next wave
Between waves show brief status:
```
✓ DISCUSS complete — user-stories.md, story-map.md created
Starting DESIGN...
```
### Step 7: Failure Handling
If any wave fails:
1. **Stop immediately** — do not proceed
2. Show error:
```
✗ {WAVE} failed
Error: [details]
Progress saved. Run /nw-continue to resume from {WAVE}.
```
3. Suggest `/nw-continue` for manual resume
4. Do NOT retry automatically
### Step 8: Completion
```
✓ Fast-forward complete for {feature-id}
DISCUSS ● complete
DESIGN ● complete
DEVOPS ● complete
DISTILL ● complete
DELIVER ● complete
All acceptance tests pass. Feature is ready.
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Response |
|-------|----------|
| No description and no existing projects | Suggest `/nw-new` |
| `--from` with missing prerequisites | List missing artifacts, refuse |
| Wave failure mid-pipeline | Stop, show error, suggest `/nw-continue` |
| Artifact verification fails after wave | Treat as wave failure |
| Name conflict on new project | Same as `/nw-new` conflict handling |
## Success Criteria
- [ ] Project resolved (new or existing)
- [ ] Current progress detected accurately
- [ ] Planned wave sequence shown to user
- [ ] User confirmed one-time before execution
- [ ] Each wave executed in sequence
- [ ] Output artifacts verified between waves
- [ ] Failure stops pipeline with clear error and `/nw-continue` suggestion
- [ ] Completion summary shown
## Examples
### Example 1: Full fast-forward from scratch
```
/nw-fast-forward "Upgrade authentication to OAuth2"
```
Wizard derives `oauth2-upgrade`, detects no prior artifacts, shows plan: DISCUSS > DESIGN > DEVOPS > DISTILL > DELIVER. User confirms. All 5 waves execute in sequence.
### Example 2: Fast-forward from mid-pipeline
```
/nw-fast-forward
```
Wizard finds `notification-service` with DISCUSS complete. Shows plan: DESIGN > DEVOPS > DISTILL > DELIVER. User confirms. 4 waves execute.
### Example 3: Fast-forward with --from flag
```
/nw-fast-forward --from=distill rate-limiting
```
Wizard validates DESIGN artifacts exist for `rate-limiting`. Shows plan: DISTILL > DELIVER. User confirms. 2 waves execute.
### Example 4: Fast-forward with failure
```
/nw-fast-forward "Add payment processing"
```
DISCUSS succeeds, DESIGN succeeds, DEVOPS fails. Pipeline stops. Shows error and suggests `/nw-continue` to resume from DEVOPS.Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
Comprehensive architecture patterns, methodologies, quality frameworks, and evaluation methods for solution architects. Load when designing system architecture or selecting patterns.
Canonical AT completeness gate — research-anchored 7-category taxonomy (C1-C7) + 15-item mechanical checklist. Paradigm-neutral. Drives acceptance-designer reviewer verdict deterministically.