Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
ES, Spanish
Skill755 estrellas del repoactualizado 7d ago

develop-solution-brief

The develop-solution-brief skill generates a concise one-page document that outlines a proposed solution, including the problem it addresses, core features, success metrics, trade-offs, and key risks. Use this skill when pitching solution approaches to stakeholders for alignment, documenting solution intent before detailed specification writing, or comparing multiple high-level options across cross-functional teams.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills /tmp/develop-solution-brief && cp -r /tmp/develop-solution-brief/skills/develop-solution-brief ~/.claude/skills/develop-solution-brief
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

SKILL.md

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->
# Solution Brief

A solution brief is a concise, one-page document that communicates the proposed solution to a problem. It serves as the bridge between problem understanding and detailed specification, providing enough context for stakeholders to align on the approach without getting lost in implementation details. The one-page constraint forces clarity and prioritization.

## When to Use

- Pitching a solution approach to stakeholders for buy-in
- Aligning cross-functional teams on what you're building and why
- Documenting solution intent before detailed PRD writing
- Comparing multiple solution options at a high level
- Communicating product direction to leadership

## When NOT to Use

- Stakeholders are aligned and engineering needs the full specification -> use `deliver-prd`; the brief pitches, the PRD specifies
- The problem is not yet framed or agreed -> use `define-problem-statement` first
- You are recording a decision already made -> use `develop-adr` (technical) or `develop-design-rationale` (design)
- You need to compare strategic options across the whole business model -> use `foundation-lean-canvas`

## Instructions

When asked to create a solution brief, follow these steps:

1. **Recap the Problem**
   Summarize the problem in 2-3 sentences maximum. Don't re-explain the full problem statement - reference it if needed. The reader should immediately understand what pain point this solution addresses.

2. **Describe the Proposed Solution**
   Explain what you're building in clear, non-technical language. Focus on the user experience and core value proposition. Avoid implementation details - this is about *what*, not *how*.

3. **List Key Features**
   Identify 3-5 essential features that comprise the solution. These should be the minimum set needed to solve the problem. Resist the urge to include nice-to-haves - the one-page constraint demands focus.

4. **Define Success Metrics**
   Connect the solution to measurable outcomes. How will you know if this works? Reference metrics from the problem statement and set targets.

5. **Acknowledge Trade-offs**
   Document what you're explicitly NOT doing and why. Good solution briefs are honest about scope limitations and alternatives that were considered but rejected.

6. **Identify Risks and Mitigations**
   Surface the biggest risks to success and your plan to address them. This builds stakeholder confidence and surfaces concerns early.

7. **Outline Next Steps**
   Provide 3-5 immediate actions to move the solution forward. Be specific about who does what.

## Output Format

Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md` to structure the output. A complete brief fills every template section: Problem Recap; Proposed Solution; Key Features; Success Metrics; Trade-offs Considered; Risks & Mitigations; and Next Steps.

## Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

- [ ] Brief fits on one page when printed (approximately 500-700 words)
- [ ] Problem recap is concise (2-3 sentences maximum)
- [ ] Solution description avoids technical jargon
- [ ] Features are limited to 3-5 essential capabilities
- [ ] Trade-offs are explicitly stated
- [ ] Next steps are specific and actionable

## Examples

See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed example.
chainSlash Command

Run an ad-hoc ordered chain of pm-skills with shared context (ephemeral; routes to the pm-workflow-orchestrator)

define-hypothesisSkill

Defines a testable hypothesis with clear success metrics and a validation approach. Use when forming assumptions to test or aligning a team on what success looks like, before any experiment is designed. To design the A/B test or experiment that will validate the hypothesis, use measure-experiment-design.

define-jtbd-canvasSkill

Creates a Jobs to be Done canvas capturing the functional, emotional, and social dimensions of a customer job. Use when deeply understanding customer motivations, designing for jobs, or reframing product positioning.

define-opportunity-treeSkill

Creates an opportunity solution tree connecting a desired outcome to customer opportunities and candidate solutions, preventing solution-first jumps in continuous discovery. Use when structuring scattered feature ideas or communicating how the roadmap traces to outcomes. For ranking an existing flat list of candidates, use define-prioritization-framework instead; this skill discovers the list, it does not score one.

define-prioritization-frameworkSkill

Run applicable prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, Weighted Scoring, Kano) against a list of features or initiatives. Produces a comparison table showing where rankings agree and diverge across frameworks, and an executive summary with recommendation. Framework applicability is filtered by data availability; Kano requires customer research. Refuses to fabricate scores; produces an estimation scaffold when input data is missing.

define-problem-statementSkill

Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.

deliver-acceptance-criteriaSkill

Generates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice, covering the happy path, key failure scenarios, and non-functional expectations in testable form. Use when turning requirements into verifiable scenarios for engineering handoff and QA sign-off. For a dedicated catalog of boundary conditions, error states, and recovery paths across a feature, use deliver-edge-cases; to write the stories themselves, use deliver-user-stories.

deliver-edge-casesSkill

Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.