logo-design

# Logo Design

A logo is a system of marks, not a single drawing. This skill produces multiple production-grade variants exploring different architectural approaches, each with rationale, application specs, and a clear position on what it signals and rejects.

The output is decision material, not a finished logo. The brand owner selects from the variants and the skill produces production refinement on the chosen direction.

---

## When to use

- The brand has a name and tonal direction; the deliverable is logo work specifically
- Generating 6 to 12 variants for client review and selection
- Refining a wordmark to production: kerning, optical adjustments, weight selection
- Exploring symbol options to pair with an existing wordmark
- Designing a monogram from a longer name for use in constrained contexts
- Adapting an existing logo across application contexts (small-size, signage, motion, embroidery)
- The brand owner has reviewed a first round and wants iteration on a specific direction

## When NOT to use

- Use `brand-identity` instead when the deliverable is the complete identity system (logo plus color plus type plus voice plus applications). This skill is the logo-specific layer; brand-identity is the system layer.
- Use `brand-discovery` for brand positioning, audience, and voice work. A logo without strategy is a drawing.
- Use `creative-direction` for project-wide aesthetic direction. Creative direction calibrates many decisions; logo design produces specific marks.
- One-off illustration, icon, or pictogram work
- Designing brand patterns, textures, or supporting graphics
- Pure typographic exploration unrelated to a brand name

---

## Required inputs

- **Brand name.** Exact spelling. Capitalization and punctuation preferences if any. Whether the name has a category descriptor that travels with it (e.g., "Atlas Coffee" vs just "Atlas").
- **Industry or category.** Legal firm, consumer goods, B2B SaaS, hospitality, etc. Category implies defaults that can be honored or broken.
- **Audience.** Who sees the logo, where, in what state of mind. The audience-side perception drives selection more than the founder-side aesthetic.
- **Tonal direction.** Where on the formal-to-casual axis. Where on the restrained-to-expressive axis. Where on the heritage-to-modern axis.
- **Application contexts.** Common set: web header, mobile app icon (28px), favicon (16 to 32px), business card, letterhead, email signature, social profile picture, signage (large format), embroidery patch (1.5 inch), single-color print, video motion lockup, merch (apparel, hats, totes).
- **Reference logos liked**, with a sentence each on what specifically resonates. The reference clarifies which architecture and register fit better than abstract description does.
- **Reference logos disliked**, with a sentence on what to avoid. Negative space sharpens positive selection.
- **Hard constraints.** Must include element X. Must avoid color Y due to industry conventions. Must reproduce in single color. Must work as a 16px favicon. Must survive embroidery.
- **Optional**: existing brand assets if the project is a refresh, not greenfield. Existing wordmark if the work is symbol-only. Existing color palette if it must remain locked.

---

## The framework: 5 considerations for logo design

A logo decision sits at the intersection of five considerations. Each one filters subsequent choices.

### 1. Mark architecture

What IS the logo, structurally?

**Architectures:**

- **Wordmark only.** The logo is the brand name set in a chosen typeface, possibly with custom letterforms. Stripe, Google, Pinterest. The discipline is letter-by-letter, with kerning, optical adjustments, sometimes a single distinguishing custom character. Strongest when the name is distinctive enough to own as type.
- **Lockup (wordmark plus symbol).** Standard architecture for most brands. The wordmark and symbol are positioned in a fixed relationship. Slack, Airbnb, Asana. Variants: symbol left of wordmark, symbol above wordmark, symbol right (rare). Each lockup may also have a stacked alternate for square contexts.
- **Symbol only.** The mark is a single symbol with no wordmark. Apple, Twitter, Target. Earned over decades through brand recognition. New brands rarely succeed with symbol-only as the primary mark, though most mature brands eventually develop a symbol-only fallback.
- **Letterform-as-symbol.** A single letter from the name (often the first) becomes the symbol. Beats by Dre's "b", McDonald's "M", Underscore's "_". Cleanest path to symbol when the wordmark is too long for a tight lockup or when the name has a letter that lends itself to visual play.
- **Monogram.** Multiple letters combined as a symbol. CN (Chanel), GG (Gucci), HBO, MN (a hypothetical Morgan Northrop monogram for an institutional financial firm). Common in legal, financial, hospitality, and heritage brands. Can read as initials or as ligature.

**How to choose:** What does the brand need to do at small sizes? At 16px, most lockups fail. A favicon-grade mark needs either a strong symbol component or a letterform-as-symbol fallback. Lockups also need stacked alternates for square contexts (social profile pictures, app icons). A pure wordmark works only if the brand has another mark that can stand in at small sizes, often a letterform-as-symbol or monogram.

A common production setup is: primary lockup for most contexts, monogram for square contexts, letterform-as-symbol for favicon and embroidery. All three derive from the same wordmark and share visual DNA.

### 2. Typographic register

If wordmark or lockup, what typographic family carries the type?

**Registers:**

- **Geometric sans.** Futura, Avenir, Avenir Next, Cabinet Grotesk, ITC Avant Garde. Built from circles and verticals. Reads modern, considered, often optimistic. Risks reading cold or generic-tech-startup if not warmed up by color, custom letterform, or context.
- **Humanist sans.** Gill Sans, Optima, Frutiger, Sourc