skill-authoring
The skill-authoring Claude Code enables creation of structured SKILL.md files for AI coding agents. Use when users request writing new skills, creating skill files, authoring agent capabilities, generating skill documentation, or defining skill templates. It provides templates, frontmatter specifications, trigger phrase guidelines, content structure recommendations, and verification checklists to ensure skills are clear, actionable, and consistently executable by agents.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohitg00/skillkit /tmp/skill-authoring && cp -r /tmp/skill-authoring/packages/core/src/methodology/packs/meta/skill-authoring ~/.claude/skills/skill-authoringSKILL.md
# Skill Authoring Guide You are authoring a SKILL.md for an AI coding agent. A well-written skill provides clear, actionable guidance that agents can follow consistently. ## Core Principle **A skill's description triggers it; the body teaches it.** The description tells the agent WHEN to use the skill. The content tells the agent HOW to execute it. ## Skill Anatomy ### SKILL.md Structure ```markdown --- name: [lowercase-hyphenated-name] description: [Concrete actions + "Use when..." clause] version: [Semantic version] triggers: - [keyword 1] - [keyword 2] tags: - [tag 1] --- # [Skill Title] [Introduction paragraph explaining purpose] ## Core Principle **[Single most important rule in bold]** ## [Main Content Sections] ## [Decision Points] ## [Verification Checklist] ``` ### Frontmatter Fields | Field | Required | Constraints | |-------|----------|-------------| | name | Yes | Lowercase alphanumeric + hyphens, 1–64 chars | | description | Yes | Must include "Use when..." clause; 1–1024 chars | | version | Yes | Semantic version (e.g. `1.0.0`) | | triggers | Recommended | Natural-language phrases that activate the skill | | tags | Recommended | Categorization tags | ## Writing Effective Triggers Triggers should be phrases users naturally type. **Good triggers:** - "write tests first" - "tdd" - "test driven development" **Bad triggers:** - "testing methodology" (too vague) - "red-green-refactor-cycle-for-test-driven-development" (too specific) - "skill-123" (not natural language) ### Trigger Guidelines 1. **Natural language** — How would a human ask for this? 2. **Multiple variations** — Different ways to say the same thing 3. **Specific enough** — Don't trigger on too many queries 4. **Common terms** — Use terms people actually use ## Writing Skill Content ### Voice and Tone Use **second person, present tense, active voice**: - ✅ "Write the test first" - ✅ "You are implementing TDD" - ❌ "The developer should..." (passive) - ❌ "It is recommended that..." (wordy) ### Structure Guidelines 1. **Start with context** — What is the agent doing and why 2. **State the core principle** — Most important rule upfront 3. **Provide process** — Step-by-step guidance 4. **Include examples** — Concrete illustrations 5. **Add a checklist** — Verification criteria 6. **End with integration** — How this connects to other skills ### Directive Language | Strength | Examples | |----------|----------| | Strong (critical rules) | "You MUST…", "ALWAYS…", "NEVER…", "Do NOT…" | | Soft (recommendations) | "Prefer…", "Consider…", "When possible…" | ## Content Patterns ### Decision Trees ```markdown ## Decision: [What to Decide] If [condition A]: → [Action for A] If [condition B]: → [Action for B] If uncertain: → [Default action] ``` ### Process Steps ```markdown ### Step 1: [Action] [Detailed explanation] **Verification:** [How to know step is complete] ### Step 2: [Action] ... ``` ### Code Examples ```typescript // BAD const result = doTheThing(badInput); // GOOD const validated = validate(input); const result = doTheThing(validated); ``` ## Anti-Patterns to Avoid | Anti-pattern | Problem | Fix | |--------------|---------|-----| | The Encyclopedia | Too much info, agent gets lost | Focus on actionable guidance only | | The Vague Guide | "Consider best practices" | Be specific: "Use Arrange-Act-Assert" | | The Constraint-Free Skill | No clear rules, agent improvises | Include explicit constraints | | The Monologue | Wall of text | Use headers, lists, tables, code blocks | | The Outdated Skill | References deprecated patterns | Version skills and review periodically | ## Skill Testing Before publishing, verify: 1. **Trigger test** — Does it activate on expected phrases? 2. **Completeness test** — Can the agent follow it without external info? 3. **Clarity test** — Is every instruction unambiguous? 4. **Contradiction test** — No conflicting guidance? 5. **Edge case test** — Handles unusual situations? ## Pack Organization Group related skills under a named pack directory. See `PACKS.md` for full pack manifest format and filesystem conventions. ``` packs/ ├── testing/ │ ├── pack.json │ ├── red-green-refactor/ │ │ └── SKILL.md │ └── test-patterns/ │ └── SKILL.md ``` ## Skill Maintenance See `MAINTENANCE.md` for detailed versioning policy. Quick reference: **Version increments:** - **Patch (1.0.x):** Typos, clarifications, minor fixes - **Minor (1.x.0):** New sections, examples, capabilities - **Major (x.0.0):** Breaking changes, fundamental rewrites **Deprecation frontmatter:** ```yaml deprecated: true deprecatedReason: "Superseded by skill-v2" deprecatedSince: "2024-01-15" ``` Add a visible notice at the top of the body: `> **DEPRECATED:** Use [skill-v2] instead.` ## Publication Checklist Before publishing, confirm: - [ ] Frontmatter is complete and valid (name, description, version) - [ ] Description includes concrete actions and a "Use when…" clause - [ ] Triggers are natural-language phrases, specific but not over-fitted - [ ] Core principle is clear and prominent - [ ] Content uses headers, lists, or tables — no walls of text - [ ] Code examples demonstrate correct vs. incorrect usage - [ ] Verification criteria are included - [ ] Related skills are linked where applicable - [ ] No spelling/grammar errors - [ ] Tested with target agents against all trigger phrases
Manages work transitions between team members or agents by creating structured handoff documents, summarizing project status, documenting key decisions, blockers, and open questions, and generating onboarding briefs. Use when someone needs to hand off, hand over, or transition a project; pass work to another person or agent; brief a colleague taking over; prepare a shift change summary; or onboard someone mid-task. Produces ready-to-use handoff documents covering current status, next steps, known issues, technical context, and communication templates for both planned and unplanned transfers.
Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.
Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".
Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
Applies systematic tracing and isolation techniques to pinpoint exactly where a bug originates in code. Use when a bug is hard to locate, code is not working as expected, an error or crash appears with unclear cause, a regression was introduced between recent commits, or you need to narrow down which component, function, or line is faulty. Covers binary search debugging, git bisect for regressions, strategic logging with [TRACE] patterns, data and control flow tracing, component isolation, minimal reproduction cases, conditional breakpoints, and watch expressions across TypeScript, SQL, and bash.
Guides the creation of technical design documents before writing code, producing architecture diagrams, data models, API interface definitions, implementation plans, and multi-option trade-off analyses. Use when the user asks to plan a feature, architect a system, design an API, explore implementation approaches, or requests a technical design or spec before coding — especially for complex features involving multiple components, ambiguous requirements, or significant architectural changes.
Breaks down complex software, writing, or research tasks into small, atomic, independently completable units with dependency graphs and milestone breakdowns. Use when the user asks to plan a project, decompose a feature, create subtasks, split up work, or needs help organizing a large piece of work into a step-by-step plan. Triggered by phrases like "break down", "decompose", "where do I start", "too big", "split into tasks", "work breakdown", or "task list".