external-resource-context
The external-resource-context skill captures and stores access methods for resources that exist outside the repository such as design systems, API schemas, IaC sources, and secret stores in a deterministic two-tier structure (project-level and feature-level documentation). Use this skill when downstream work depends on external resources or when users mention design sources, design systems, API schemas, IaC sources, secret stores, or canonical sources that the codebase needs to reference.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows /tmp/external-resource-context && cp -r /tmp/external-resource-context/dev-workflows-fullstack/skills/external-resource-context ~/.claude/skills/external-resource-contextSKILL.md
# External Resource Context ## Purpose AI agents understand the codebase but not the external resources surrounding it. This skill captures, in a deterministic location, the **access methods** to resources outside the repository so downstream work (design, planning, implementation, review) can reach them without re-asking the user. Resources covered: design origin (where the canonical visual specification lives), design system (component library and tokens), guidelines (usage docs, accessibility rules), visual verification environment (how to confirm rendering), database schema source, migration history, secret store location, API schema source (OpenAPI / proto / GraphQL SDL), mock environment, IaC source, environment configuration. ## Scope Boundaries **In scope**: hearing protocol, storage location, single-source-of-truth ownership rule, reference protocol for downstream consumers. **Out of scope**: enforcing that captured resources are correct or current — verification belongs to the agent that consumes the resource. Generating the resources themselves (e.g., creating a DESIGN.md from scratch). ## Storage Locations (Two-Tier) | Tier | Location | Holds | Update Frequency | |------|----------|-------|------------------| | Project | `docs/project-context/external-resources.md` | Environment-stable facts: which resources exist for this project and how to access them (URL, MCP name, file path, command) | Rare — only when the project's environment changes | | Feature | `## External Resources Used` section inside the relevant UI Spec or Design Doc | The subset of project-tier resources actually used by this feature, plus feature-specific identifiers (e.g., a specific node id within the design tool, a specific endpoint path) | Per feature | ### Single Source of Truth Rule The project tier owns environment facts. Feature-tier sections list only feature-specific identifiers (node id within the design source, specific endpoint path within the API, specific IaC module name) and reference project-tier entries by label; URLs, MCP names, and access commands remain in the project-tier file. When the environment changes, only the project-tier file is updated. Example feature-tier entry uses the table format defined in `references/template.md`: a row with the project-tier label in the first column and the feature-specific identifier in the second column. ## Hearing Protocol ### When to Hear | Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | `docs/project-context/external-resources.md` does not exist | Run full hearing for the relevant domain(s) | | File exists | Ask the user via AskUserQuestion: "Update external-resources.md? (no / yes-full / yes-diff-only)". On `yes-full` run full hearing. On `yes-diff-only` ask the user which axes changed, hear only those. On `no` skip hearing | ### Domain Routing Load the domain reference matching the current task: | Task type | References to load | |-----------|--------------------| | Frontend (UI work) | [references/frontend.md](references/frontend.md) | | Backend (server / data work) | [references/backend.md](references/backend.md) | | API contract work | [references/api.md](references/api.md) | | Infrastructure / deployment | [references/infra.md](references/infra.md) | | Fullstack | All of the above; per-axis "Not applicable" answers are expected | Each domain reference defines the axes and the question template. ### Two-Phase Hearing 1. **Structured hearing** — for each axis defined in the domain reference, present the user with AskUserQuestion using the choices listed there (always include "Not applicable" as an option). For each non-N/A axis, follow up with an access-method question (URL / MCP name / file path / command). 2. **Self-declaration** — after the structured axes, present a single AskUserQuestion: "Are there any other external resources for this work that the structured questions did not cover? If yes, describe them in your next message." If the user describes additional resources, append them to the storage file under an "Additional resources" subsection. The two phases are sequential. Self-declaration runs even if the user answered "Not applicable" to every structured axis. ## Storage Protocol After hearing completes: 1. Build the project-tier content from the answers. Use [references/template.md](references/template.md) as the structure. 2. Write to `docs/project-context/external-resources.md`. Create the directory if absent. 3. When the calling workflow has a target UI Spec or Design Doc, also append or update the document's `## External Resources Used` section with the feature-tier subset (label references + feature-specific identifiers only). 4. Report the file paths back to the calling workflow. ## Reference Protocol (For Downstream Consumers) Agents that load this skill consult resources in this order: 1. Read `docs/project-context/external-resources.md` first (if present) to learn what is available and how to access it. 2. Read the target UI Spec or Design Doc's `## External Resources Used` section for feature-specific identifiers. 3. Use the access method declared in the project tier (e.g., the named MCP, the URL, the file path) to fetch the actual resource content. Agents that only need to *consult* the saved file as input data (not actively hear) can read it directly without loading this skill — frontmatter declaration is reserved for agents that may need to trigger hearing or interpret the protocol semantics. ## Output Format The project-tier file follows the structure in [references/template.md](references/template.md). The project-tier file's heading levels and section names are fixed so downstream agents can locate sections deterministically. For feature-tier sections inside UI Spec or Design Doc, the heading text "External Resources Used" is fixed; the heading level matches the parent document's natural structure (h2 in UI Spec where it is a sibling of other top-level sections, h3 in Design Doc where i
Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal tests with maximum coverage.
Validates Design Doc compliance and implementation completeness from third-party perspective. Use PROACTIVELY after implementation completes or when "review/implementation check/compliance" is mentioned. Provides acceptance criteria validation and quality reports.
Validates consistency between PRD/Design Doc and code implementation. Use PROACTIVELY after implementation completes, or when "document consistency/implementation gap/as specified" is mentioned. Uses multi-source evidence matching to identify discrepancies.
Analyzes existing codebase objectively for facts about implementation, user behavior patterns, and technical architecture. Use when existing code needs to be understood without hypothesis bias. Invoked before Design Doc creation to produce focused guidance for technical designers.
Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.
Reviews document consistency and completeness, providing approval decisions. Use PROACTIVELY after PRD/UI Spec/Design Doc/work plan creation, or when "document review/approval/check" is mentioned. Detects contradictions and rule violations with improvement suggestions.
Verifies consistency between test skeleton comments and implementation code. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructions.
Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports only observations without proposing solutions.