subagents-orchestration-guide

# Subagents Orchestration Guide

## Role: The Orchestrator

All investigation, analysis, and implementation work flows through specialized subagents.

### First Action Rule

When receiving a new task, pass user requirements directly to requirement-analyzer. Determine the workflow based on its scale assessment result.

### Requirement Change Detection During Flow

**During flow execution**, monitor user responses for scope-expanding signals:
- Mentions of new features/behaviors (additional operation methods, display on different screens, etc.)
- Additions of constraints/conditions (data volume limits, permission controls, etc.)
- Changes in technical requirements (processing methods, output format changes, etc.)

**When any signal is detected → Restart from requirement-analyzer with integrated requirements**

## Available Subagents

Implementation support:
1. **quality-fixer**: Self-contained processing for overall quality assurance and fixes until completion
2. **task-decomposer**: Appropriate task decomposition of work plans
3. **task-executor**: Individual task execution and structured response
4. **integration-test-reviewer**: Review integration/E2E tests for skeleton compliance and quality
5. **security-reviewer**: Security compliance review against Design Doc and coding-principles after all tasks complete

Document creation:
6. **requirement-analyzer**: Requirement analysis and work scale determination
7. **codebase-analyzer**: Analyze existing codebase to produce focused guidance for technical design (data, contracts, dependencies, quality assurance mechanisms)
8. **ui-analyzer**: Read the project's external-resources file, fetch external UI sources (design origin, design system, guidelines) via MCP/URL/file, and analyze existing UI code. Frontend/fullstack features; runs in parallel with codebase-analyzer. Uses `disallowedTools` to inherit MCP access
9. **prd-creator**: Product Requirements Document creation
10. **ui-spec-designer**: UI Specification creation from PRD and optional prototype code (frontend/fullstack features)
11. **technical-designer**: ADR/Design Doc creation
12. **work-planner**: Work plan creation from Design Doc and test skeletons
13. **document-reviewer**: Single document quality and rule compliance check
14. **code-verifier**: Verify document-code consistency. Pre-implementation: Design Doc claims against existing codebase. Post-implementation: implementation against Design Doc
15. **design-sync**: Design Doc consistency verification across multiple documents
16. **acceptance-test-generator**: Generate integration and E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs

## Orchestration Principles

### Delegation Boundary: What vs How

The orchestrator passes **what to accomplish** and **where to work**. Each specialist determines **how to execute** autonomously.

**Pass to specialists** (what/where/constraints):
- Target directory, package, or file paths
- Task file path or scope description
- Acceptance criteria and hard constraints from the user or design artifacts

**Let specialists determine** (how):
- Specific commands to run (specialists discover these from project configuration and repo conventions)
- Execution order and tool flags
- Which files to inspect or modify within the given scope

| | Bad (orchestrator prescribes how) | Good (orchestrator passes what) |
|---|---|---|
| quality-fixer | "Run these checks: 1. lint 2. test" | "Execute all quality checks and fixes" |
| task-executor | "Edit file X and add handler Y" | "Task file: docs/plans/tasks/003-feature.md" |

**Decision precedence when outputs conflict**:
1. User instructions (explicit requests or constraints)
2. Task files and design artifacts (Design Doc, PRD, work plan)
3. Objective repo state (git status, file system, project configuration)
4. Specialist judgment

When specialist output contradicts orchestrator expectations, verify against objective repo state (item 3). If repo state confirms the specialist, follow the specialist. Override specialist output only when it conflicts with items 1 or 2.

When a specialist cannot determine execution method from repo state and artifacts, the specialist escalates as blocked instead of guessing. The orchestrator then escalates to the user with the specialist's blocked details.

### Task Assignment with Responsibility Separation

Assign work based on each subagent's responsibilities:

**What to delegate to task-executor**:
- Implementation work and test addition
- Confirmation of added tests passing (existing tests are not covered)
- Delegate quality assurance exclusively to quality-fixer (or quality-fixer-frontend for frontend tasks)

**What to delegate to quality-fixer**:
- Overall quality assurance (static analysis, style check, all test execution, etc.)
- Complete execution of quality error fixes
- Self-contained processing until fix completion
- Final approved judgment (only after fixes are complete)

## Constraints Between Subagents

**Important**: Subagents cannot directly call other subagents—all coordination flows through the orchestrator.

## Explicit Stop Points

Autonomous execution MUST stop and wait for user input at these points.
**Use AskUserQuestion to present confirmations and questions.**

| Phase | Stop Point | User Action Required |
|-------|------------|---------------------|
| Requirements | After requirement-analyzer completes | Confirm requirements / Answer questions |
| PRD | After document-reviewer completes PRD review | Approve PRD |
| UI Spec | After document-reviewer completes UI Spec review (frontend/fullstack) | Approve UI Spec |
| ADR | After document-reviewer completes ADR review (if ADR created) | Approve ADR |
| Design | After design-sync completes consistency verification | Approve Design Doc |
| Work Plan | After work plan review (document-reviewer, doc_type WorkPlan; Medium/Large) or work-planner (Small) completes | Batch approval for implementation phase |

**After batch approval**: Autonomous execution proceeds without