agent-md-refactor
agent-md-refactor reorganizes oversized agent instruction files like AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md by extracting essential core information and splitting remaining content into categorized, linked documentation following progressive disclosure principles. Use this skill when instruction files become unwieldy and need structural simplification to improve clarity and maintainability across distributed documentation.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit /tmp/agent-md-refactor && cp -r /tmp/agent-md-refactor/skills/agent-md-refactor ~/.claude/skills/agent-md-refactorSKILL.md
# Agent MD Refactor
Refactor bloated agent instruction files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, COPILOT.md, etc.) to follow **progressive disclosure principles** - keeping essentials at root and organizing the rest into linked, categorized files.
---
## Triggers
Use this skill when:
- "refactor my AGENTS.md" / "refactor my CLAUDE.md"
- "split my agent instructions"
- "organize my CLAUDE.md file"
- "my AGENTS.md is too long"
- "progressive disclosure for my instructions"
- "clean up my agent config"
---
## Quick Reference
| Phase | Action | Output |
|-------|--------|--------|
| 1. Analyze | Find contradictions | List of conflicts to resolve |
| 2. Extract | Identify essentials | Core instructions for root file |
| 3. Categorize | Group remaining instructions | Logical categories |
| 4. Structure | Create file hierarchy | Root + linked files |
| 5. Prune | Flag for deletion | Redundant/vague instructions |
---
## Process
### Phase 1: Find Contradictions
Identify any instructions that conflict with each other.
**Look for:**
- Contradictory style guidelines (e.g., "use semicolons" vs "no semicolons")
- Conflicting workflow instructions
- Incompatible tool preferences
- Mutually exclusive patterns
**For each contradiction found:**
```markdown
## Contradiction Found
**Instruction A:** [quote]
**Instruction B:** [quote]
**Question:** Which should take precedence, or should both be conditional?
```
Ask the user to resolve before proceeding.
---
### Phase 2: Identify the Essentials
Extract ONLY what belongs in the root agent file. The root should be minimal - information that applies to **every single task**.
**Essential content (keep in root):**
| Category | Example |
|----------|---------|
| Project description | One sentence: "A React dashboard for analytics" |
| Package manager | Only if not npm (e.g., "Uses pnpm") |
| Non-standard commands | Custom build/test/typecheck commands |
| Critical overrides | Things that MUST override defaults |
| Universal rules | Applies to 100% of tasks |
**NOT essential (move to linked files):**
- Language-specific conventions
- Testing guidelines
- Code style details
- Framework patterns
- Documentation standards
- Git workflow details
---
### Phase 3: Group the Rest
Organize remaining instructions into logical categories.
**Common categories:**
| Category | Contents |
|----------|----------|
| `typescript.md` | TS conventions, type patterns, strict mode rules |
| `testing.md` | Test frameworks, coverage, mocking patterns |
| `code-style.md` | Formatting, naming, comments, structure |
| `git-workflow.md` | Commits, branches, PRs, reviews |
| `architecture.md` | Patterns, folder structure, dependencies |
| `api-design.md` | REST/GraphQL conventions, error handling |
| `security.md` | Auth patterns, input validation, secrets |
| `performance.md` | Optimization rules, caching, lazy loading |
**Grouping rules:**
1. Each file should be self-contained for its topic
2. Aim for 3-8 files (not too granular, not too broad)
3. Name files clearly: `{topic}.md`
4. Include only actionable instructions
---
### Phase 4: Create the File Structure
**Output structure:**
```
project-root/
├── CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) # Minimal root with links
└── .claude/ # Or docs/agent-instructions/
├── typescript.md
├── testing.md
├── code-style.md
├── git-workflow.md
└── architecture.md
```
**Root file template:**
```markdown
# Project Name
One-sentence description of the project.
## Quick Reference
- **Package Manager:** pnpm
- **Build:** `pnpm build`
- **Test:** `pnpm test`
- **Typecheck:** `pnpm typecheck`
## Detailed Instructions
For specific guidelines, see:
- [TypeScript Conventions](.claude/typescript.md)
- [Testing Guidelines](.claude/testing.md)
- [Code Style](.claude/code-style.md)
- [Git Workflow](.claude/git-workflow.md)
- [Architecture Patterns](.claude/architecture.md)
```
**Each linked file template:**
```markdown
# {Topic} Guidelines
## Overview
Brief context for when these guidelines apply.
## Rules
### Rule Category 1
- Specific, actionable instruction
- Another specific instruction
### Rule Category 2
- Specific, actionable instruction
## Examples
### Good
\`\`\`typescript
// Example of correct pattern
\`\`\`
### Avoid
\`\`\`typescript
// Example of what not to do
\`\`\`
```
---
### Phase 5: Flag for Deletion
Identify instructions that should be removed entirely.
**Delete if:**
| Criterion | Example | Why Delete |
|-----------|---------|------------|
| Redundant | "Use TypeScript" (in a .ts project) | Agent already knows |
| Too vague | "Write clean code" | Not actionable |
| Overly obvious | "Don't introduce bugs" | Wastes context |
| Default behavior | "Use descriptive variable names" | Standard practice |
| Outdated | References deprecated APIs | No longer applies |
**Output format:**
```markdown
## Flagged for Deletion
| Instruction | Reason |
|-------------|--------|
| "Write clean, maintainable code" | Too vague to be actionable |
| "Use TypeScript" | Redundant - project is already TS |
| "Don't commit secrets" | Agent already knows this |
| "Follow best practices" | Meaningless without specifics |
```
---
## Execution Checklist
```
[ ] Phase 1: All contradictions identified and resolved
[ ] Phase 2: Root file contains ONLY essentials
[ ] Phase 3: All remaining instructions categorized
[ ] Phase 4: File structure created with proper links
[ ] Phase 5: Redundant/vague instructions removed
[ ] Verify: Each linked file is self-contained
[ ] Verify: Root file is under 50 lines
[ ] Verify: All links work correctly
```
---
## Anti-Patterns
| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|-------|-----|---------|
| Keeping everything in root | Bloated, hard to maintain | Split into linked files |
| Too many categories | Fragmentation | Consolidate related topics |
| Vague instructions | Wastes tokens, no value | Be specific or delete |
| Duplicating defaults | Agent already knows | Only override when neededAdd a skill to the project with validation and README generation
Sync root README.md with current skills inventory from skills/ directory
Use this agent when you need to visualize UI concepts through ASCII mockups before implementation. Examples: <example>Context: User has an idea for a dashboard layout with data tables and charts. user: 'I want to create a dashboard that shows user analytics with a sidebar navigation, main content area with charts, and a data table below' assistant: 'I'll use the ascii-ui-mockup-generator agent to create multiple ASCII mockup variations for your dashboard concept.' <commentary>The user wants to visualize a UI concept, so use the ascii-ui-mockup-generator to create multiple ASCII representations they can choose from.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User is designing a form layout with multiple input fields. user: 'I need a contact form with name, email, message fields and a submit button' assistant: 'Let me use the ascii-ui-mockup-generator to create several ASCII mockup options for your contact form layout.' <commentary>Since the user needs to visualize form layouts, use the ascii-ui-mockup-generator to provide multiple ASCII design options.</commentary></example>
codebase-pattern-finder is a useful subagent_type for finding similar implementations, usage examples, or existing patterns that can be modeled after. It will give you concrete code examples based on what you're looking for! It's sorta like codebase-locator, but it will not only tell you the location of files, it will also give you code details!
PROACTIVELY use when reviewing communication drafts or preparing difficult conversations. Provides email refinement, tone calibration, roleplay practice, and presentation feedback with actionable suggestions.
Default agent for handling complex, multi-step tasks with automatic delegation capabilities
Mermaid diagram specialist for creating flowcharts, sequence diagrams, ERDs,
Expert UI/UX design critic and advisor who provides research-backed, opinionated feedback on interfaces. Use when you need honest assessment of design decisions, want to avoid generic "AI slop" aesthetics, need evidence-based UX guidance, or want distinctive design direction grounded in actual user behavior research. This agent will push back on bad ideas and cite sources for every recommendation.