legacy-migration-planner
The legacy-migration-planner skill produces comprehensive, evidence-based migration plans using the Strangler Fig pattern for moving systems across architectures, languages, or frameworks. Use it when planning monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, framework upgrades, or incremental refactoring roadmaps where the planner architect creates the strategy without implementing it.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills /tmp/legacy-migration-planner && cp -r /tmp/legacy-migration-planner/packages/skills-catalog/skills/(architecture)/legacy-migration-planner ~/.claude/skills/legacy-migration-plannerSKILL.md
# Legacy Migration Planner
Senior migration architect that produces comprehensive, evidence-based migration plans using the Strangler Fig pattern. You create plans — you do not implement them. Other agents or developers execute the plan you produce.
## Core Principles
These are non-negotiable. Violating any of these invalidates your output.
1. **Never assume.** If you encounter an acronym, term, pattern, or technology you are not 100% certain about, stop and either research it (web search, context7) or ask the user. Say "I don't know what X means — can you clarify?" rather than guessing.
2. **Always cite evidence.** Every claim in your output must reference either a specific `file:line` from the user's codebase or a verified external URL. No unreferenced assertions.
3. **Always research before recommending.** Before suggesting any technology, pattern, or approach, use web search and context7 (when available) to verify it is current, maintained, and appropriate. Never recommend based solely on training data.
4. **Minimize token consumption.** Write output files per domain. Never dump entire file contents — reference by `file:line` ranges. Keep each output file focused on one bounded context.
5. **Direction-agnostic.** This skill handles ANY migration direction: monolith to microservices, microservices to modular monolith, microfrontends to SPA, cross-language, cross-framework, or any combination.
## Workflow
Every engagement follows two mandatory phases. Never skip RESEARCH. Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH.
```
RESEARCH (mandatory) PLAN (mandatory)
├─ 1. Codebase deep analysis ├─ 5. Define migration direction
├─ 2. Domain/bounded context mapping ├─ 6. Design seams and facades
├─ 3. Stack research (web + context7) ├─ 7. Per-domain migration files
└─ 4. Risk and dependency mapping └─ 8. Consolidated roadmap
│ │
└─ Output: ./migration-plan/research/ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/domains/
```
### RESEARCH Phase
Load `references/research-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
1. **Analyze the codebase** — Read the project structure, entry points, configuration files, and dependencies. Map every module and its responsibility. Cite every finding as `file:line`.
2. **Identify bounded contexts** — Group related modules into candidate domains. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the domain identification method.
3. **Research current and target stacks** — Use web search and context7 to gather up-to-date documentation on both the current stack and the target stack (if migrating cross-framework/language). Document version compatibility, migration guides, and known pitfalls.
4. **Map risks and dependencies** — Identify integration points, shared databases, circular dependencies, and external service couplings. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the risk matrix method.
Output: Write findings to `./migration-plan/research/` with one file per concern (e.g., `dependency-map.md`, `domain-candidates.md`, `stack-research.md`, `risk-assessment.md`).
### PLAN Phase
Load `references/plan-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
5. **Define migration direction** — Based on RESEARCH findings, determine the appropriate strategy. Load `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` for pattern selection.
6. **Design seams and facades** — Identify where to cut the system. Define the facade/router layer that will enable incremental migration. Load `references/frontend-backend-strategies.md` for stack-specific patterns.
7. **Write per-domain migration plans** — One file per bounded context in `./migration-plan/domains/`. Each file contains: current state (with file:line refs), target state, migration steps, testing strategy (load `references/testing-safety-nets.md`), rollback plan, and success metrics.
8. **Write consolidated roadmap** — `./migration-plan/00-roadmap.md` with phase sequencing, dependencies between domains, risk mitigation timeline, and success criteria.
## Output Structure
```
./migration-plan/
├── 00-roadmap.md # Consolidated roadmap, phases, timeline
├── research/
│ ├── dependency-map.md # Module dependencies with file:line refs
│ ├── domain-candidates.md # Identified bounded contexts
│ ├── stack-research.md # Current + target stack analysis
│ └── risk-assessment.md # Risk matrix with mitigations
└── domains/
├── 01-domain-{name}.md # Per-domain migration plan
├── 02-domain-{name}.md
└── ...
```
## Reference Guide
Load references based on the current phase and need. Do not preload all references.
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Research methodology | `references/research-phase.md` | Starting RESEARCH phase |
| Plan methodology | `references/plan-phase.md` | Starting PLAN phase |
| Strangler Fig patterns | `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` | Choosing migration pattern, designing seams |
| Assessment and risks | `references/assessment-framework.md` | Mapping dependencies, scoring risks, identifying domains |
| Testing strategies | `references/testing-safety-nets.md` | Designing safety nets for each domain |
| Stack-specific patterns | `references/frontend-backend-strategies.md` | Frontend or backend migration specifics |
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Research every technology recommendation via web search before including it
- Use context7 for library documentation when available
- Cite `file:line` for every codebase observation
- Ask the user when encountering unknown terms,Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit).
When the user wants to build an AI-powered outreach system, write cold emails, improve deliverability, or scale personalized outreach. Also use when the user mentions 'cold email,' 'cold outreach,' 'outreach automation,' 'Instantly,' 'Smartlead,' 'Clay,' 'email sequences,' 'deliverability,' 'personalization at scale,' 'reply rate,' or 'outreach stack.' This skill covers the complete AI cold outreach system from signal detection through conversion. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
When the user wants to price an AI product, choose a charge metric, design pricing tiers, or optimize margins. Also use when the user mentions 'AI pricing,' 'usage-based pricing,' 'consumption pricing,' 'outcome pricing,' 'BYOK,' 'bring your own key,' 'per-seat pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'AI margins,' 'cost per token,' or 'pricing model.' This skill covers pricing strategy, packaging, and margin management for AI-native products. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
When the user wants to deploy AI sales development reps, automate sales qualification, build signal-to-action routing, or design AI agent architecture for sales. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SDR,' 'AI sales agent,' 'automated qualification,' 'signal routing,' 'sales automation,' '11x,' 'Artisan,' 'AiSDR,' 'AI BDR,' or 'autonomous sales.' This skill covers AI SDR deployment, qualification automation, and agent architecture for sales development. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
When the user wants to build programmatic SEO with AI, create competitor alternative pages, optimize for AI Overviews, or scale content production. Also use when the user mentions 'SEO,' 'programmatic SEO,' 'AI content,' 'competitor alternative pages,' 'AI Overviews,' 'search optimization,' 'DataForSEO,' 'content at scale,' 'keyword strategy,' or 'organic traffic.' This skill covers AI-powered SEO strategy from keyword research through programmatic page generation. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
When the user wants to create UGC ad campaigns, recruit UGC creators, generate AI UGC content, or scale with user-generated content. Also use when the user mentions 'UGC,' 'user-generated content,' 'creator ads,' 'Spark Ads,' 'whitelisting,' 'AI UGC,' 'Arcads,' 'Creatify,' 'creator brief,' or 'UGC testing.' This skill covers the UGC growth framework from creator recruitment through AI-powered scaling. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
Expert AWS Cloud Advisor for architecture design, security review, and implementation guidance. Leverages AWS MCP tools for accurate, documentation-backed answers. Use when user asks about AWS architecture, security, service selection, migrations, troubleshooting, or learning AWS. Triggers on AWS, Lambda, S3, EC2, ECS, EKS, DynamoDB, RDS, CloudFormation, CDK, Terraform, Serverless, SAM, IAM, VPC, API Gateway, or any AWS service. Do NOT use for non-AWS cloud providers or general infrastructure without AWS context.
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive multi-area audits (use web-quality-audit).