fetch-pr-comments
This Claude Code skill fetches unresolved review threads, review body comments, and PR conversation comments from a GitHub pull request and displays them in a organized summary grouped by file. Use it when you need to review all feedback on a PR without making any changes, such as when asked to show or summarize PR comments and unresolved threads.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turbo /tmp/fetch-pr-comments && cp -r /tmp/fetch-pr-comments/claude/skills/fetch-pr-comments ~/.claude/skills/fetch-pr-commentsSKILL.md
# Fetch PR Comments
Fetch unresolved review comments, top-level review body comments, and PR conversation comments from a GitHub PR and present them in a readable summary. This is a read-only skill -- it does not evaluate, fix, or reply to any comments.
## Step 1: Fetch Comments
Auto-detect owner, repo, and PR number from current branch if not provided. Then run `scripts/fetch-pr-data.sh`, which handles full pagination (review threads, inner comment pages for long threads, reviews, issue comments) and emits a single merged JSON document:
```bash
bash <skill-dir>/scripts/fetch-pr-data.sh <owner> <repo> <pr_number>
```
Output shape:
```jsonc
{
"meta": { "title", "url", "headRefName", "baseRefName" },
"reviewThreads": [ { "id", "isResolved", "isOutdated", "comments": { "nodes": [ { "author", "body", "path", "line", "originalLine", "diffHunk" } ] } } ],
"reviews": [ { "author", "body", "state" } ],
"issueComments": [ { "author", "body", "createdAt", "url" } ]
}
```
Filter review threads to unresolved only. Filter reviews to those with a non-empty body, excluding `PENDING` state (unsubmitted drafts). Filter issue comments to those with a non-empty body.
## Step 2: Present Results
Display a summary header followed by comments grouped by file.
**Summary header:**
- PR title and link
- Branch: `head` -> `base`
- Total threads / unresolved threads
**Top-level review comments (if any):**
Show reviews with non-empty body before the file-grouped threads:
```
## Review Comments
### @reviewer (CHANGES_REQUESTED)
> Review body text here
### @another-reviewer (COMMENTED)
> Another review body here
```
**Issue comments (if any):**
Show PR conversation comments after review comments, ordered by `createdAt`:
```
## Issue Comments
### @commenter (2026-04-20)
> Issue comment body here
### @another-commenter (2026-04-21)
> Another issue comment body here
```
**Inline threads grouped by file:**
For each file with unresolved threads, show:
````
## `path/to/file.ts`
### Line 42 (by @reviewer)
```diff
<diffHunk from first comment>
```
> Comment body here
### Line 10 (by @another-reviewer) [outdated]
```diff
<diffHunk from first comment>
```
> First comment body
>
> **@reply-author:** Reply body
````
**Formatting rules:**
- Show top-level review body comments first, grouped under "Review Comments"
- Show PR conversation comments next, grouped under "Issue Comments", ordered by `createdAt`
- Then group threads by file path, in the order they appear
- Within each file, order threads by line number
- Show the `diffHunk` from the first comment in each thread as a fenced diff code block before the comment body. This is the code context the reviewer was looking at.
- For the line number, use `line` if available. Fall back to `originalLine` for outdated comments where `line` is null.
- Show all comments in a thread (the first is the original review comment; subsequent ones are replies)
- Mark outdated threads with `[outdated]`
- Use blockquotes for comment bodies
- For threads with multiple comments, show each comment with its author
- If there are zero unresolved threads, zero review body comments, and zero issue comments, say so and stop
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
## Rules
- If the user wants to fix or reply to comments, direct them to use `/resolve-pr-comments`.For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft answers to PR questions\", or \"explain reviewer questions\".
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to \"apply findings\", \"apply fixes\", \"apply suggestions\", \"apply accepted findings\", \"fix the findings\", or \"apply the review results\".
Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use when the user asks to \"audit the project\", \"run a full audit\", \"project health check\", \"audit my code\", \"codebase audit\", or \"comprehensive review\".
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by $create-changelog and $update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
Enforce mirror, reuse, and symmetry principles to keep new code consistent with surrounding code. Use when writing new code in an existing codebase, adding new features, refactoring, or making any code changes.
Run autonomous task execution using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex exec\", \"run codex exec\", \"execute a task with codex\", or \"delegate to codex\".
Run AI-powered code review using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex review\", \"run codex review\", or \"review a commit with codex\".
Shared commit message rules and technical constraints referenced by $stage-commit and $commit-staged. Not typically invoked directly.