verify
Verify that a change really works before you claim completion
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode /tmp/verify && cp -r /tmp/verify/skills/verify ~/.claude/skills/verifySKILL.md
# Verify Use this skill when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works. ## Goal Turn vague “it should work” claims into concrete evidence. ## Workflow 1. Identify the exact behavior that must be proven. 2. Prefer existing tests first. 3. If coverage is missing, run the narrowest direct verification commands available. 4. If direct automation is not enough, describe the manual validation steps and gather concrete observable evidence. 5. Report only what was actually verified. ## Verification order 1. Existing tests 2. Typecheck / build 3. Narrow direct command checks 4. Manual or interactive validation ## Rules - Do not say a change is complete without evidence. - If a check fails, include the failure clearly. - If no realistic verification path exists, say that explicitly instead of bluffing. - Prefer concise evidence summaries over noisy logs. ## Output - What was verified - Which commands/tests were run - What passed - What failed or remains unverified
Clean AI-generated code slop with a regression-safe, deletion-first workflow and optional reviewer-only mode
Pre-planning consultant for requirements analysis (Opus)
Strategic Architecture & Debugging Advisor (Opus, READ-ONLY)
Process-first advisor routing for Claude, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity, Grok, or Cursor via `omc ask`, with artifact capture and no raw CLI assembly
Full autonomous execution from idea to working code
Stateful single-mission improvement loop with strict evaluator contract, markdown decision logs, and max-runtime stop behavior
Cancel any active OMC mode (autopilot, ralph, ultragoal, swarm, ultrapilot, pipeline, team) and clean up retired legacy state
Claude-Codex-Gemini tri-model orchestration via /ask codex + /ask antigravity (or gemini), then Claude synthesizes results