Skill329 estrellas del repoactualizado 5d ago

ask-obstacle-acceptance

The ask-obstacle-acceptance skill presents identified obstacles with severity assessments, mitigations, and effort estimates to users, then requests their acceptance through structured dialogue. Use this skill after obstacles have been identified to gauge whether a proposed direction remains viable, or whether investigation should return to candidate generation.

Ver fuente Repositorio: de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Instalar en Claude Code

Copiar

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine /tmp/ask-obstacle-acceptance && cp -r /tmp/ask-obstacle-acceptance/skills/ask-obstacle-acceptance ~/.claude/skills/ask-obstacle-acceptance

Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

Definición

SKILL.md

# Ask Obstacle Acceptance

Get user's acceptance of the obstacle landscape.

## Execution

Dialogue — inline, no subagent.

## What to Present

Each obstacle with:
- Severity assessment
- Proposed mitigation
- Estimated effort

## What to Ask (one at a time)

- Given these obstacles and mitigations, can you accept this direction?
- Are there difficulties I missed that you're aware of?
- Is there any obstacle here that's a complete deal-breaker?

## Search

Optional — may use the 5 imported skills if user raises new concerns that need investigation.

## If Unacceptable

Signal to tactic that direction needs to change (return to present-candidates in direction-narrowing tactic).

## Output

User's acceptance decision + any new concerns raised.

Del mismo repositorio

formated-resultSkill

Experiment-specific - summarize the DARE executor's research design into a clean research_result report, forced to write back into the spec file produced by formated-specs.

formated-specsSkill

Experiment-specific - replaces writing-specs, emits DARE's 4-layer call plan as a clean research_graph schema. Last step forces load formated-result.

injection-fidelitySkill

loss-1 judge - read a sample's full dialogue and decide whether the user simulator semantically enacted its Policy Card. check-blind.

ladder-quality-orderSkill

loss-2 judge - pairwise quality comparison across the n rungs within one topic; decide monotonicity and endpoint separation. check-blind, D1-D5 only.

abductive-hypothesis-generationSkill

Strategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理

ablation-brainstormSkill

Remove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.

ablation-component-mappingSkill

Map system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies

ablation-designSkill

Design ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems