whats-next
The whats-next command generates a comprehensive handoff document that captures complete conversation context, work progress, remaining tasks, attempted approaches, and critical decisions. Use this command before ending a session to enable seamless continuation of complex projects like coding, research, analysis, or writing in a fresh context without information loss.
mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/glittercowboy/taches-cc-resources/HEAD/commands/whats-next.md -o ~/.claude/commands/whats-next.mdwhats-next.md
Create a comprehensive, detailed handoff document that captures all context from the current conversation. This allows continuing the work in a fresh context with complete precision. ## Instructions **PRIORITY: Comprehensive detail and precision over brevity.** The goal is to enable someone (or a fresh Claude instance) to pick up exactly where you left off with zero information loss. Adapt the level of detail to the task type (coding, research, analysis, writing, configuration, etc.) but maintain comprehensive coverage: 1. **Original Task**: Identify what was initially requested (not new scope or side tasks) 2. **Work Completed**: Document everything accomplished in detail - All artifacts created, modified, or analyzed (files, documents, research findings, etc.) - Specific changes made (code with line numbers, content written, data analyzed, etc.) - Actions taken (commands run, APIs called, searches performed, tools used, etc.) - Findings discovered (insights, patterns, answers, data points, etc.) - Decisions made and the reasoning behind them 3. **Work Remaining**: Specify exactly what still needs to be done - Break down remaining work into specific, actionable steps - Include precise locations, references, or targets (file paths, URLs, data sources, etc.) - Note dependencies, prerequisites, or ordering requirements - Specify validation or verification steps needed 4. **Attempted Approaches**: Capture everything tried, including failures - Approaches that didn't work and why they failed - Errors encountered, blockers hit, or limitations discovered - Dead ends to avoid repeating - Alternative approaches considered but not pursued 5. **Critical Context**: Preserve all essential knowledge - Key decisions and trade-offs considered - Constraints, requirements, or boundaries - Important discoveries, gotchas, edge cases, or non-obvious behaviors - Relevant environment, configuration, or setup details - Assumptions made that need validation - References to documentation, sources, or resources consulted 6. **Current State**: Document the exact current state - Status of deliverables (complete, in-progress, not started) - What's committed, saved, or finalized vs. what's temporary or draft - Any temporary changes, workarounds, or open questions - Current position in the workflow or process Write to `whats-next.md` in the current working directory using the format below. ## Output Format ```xml <original_task> [The specific task that was initially requested - be precise about scope] </original_task> <work_completed> [Comprehensive detail of everything accomplished: - Artifacts created/modified/analyzed (with specific references) - Specific changes, additions, or findings (with details and locations) - Actions taken (commands, searches, API calls, tool usage, etc.) - Key discoveries or insights - Decisions made and reasoning - Side tasks completed] </work_completed> <work_remaining> [Detailed breakdown of what needs to be done: - Specific tasks with precise locations or references - Exact targets to create, modify, or analyze - Dependencies and ordering - Validation or verification steps needed] </work_remaining> <attempted_approaches> [Everything tried, including failures: - Approaches that didn't work and why - Errors, blockers, or limitations encountered - Dead ends to avoid - Alternative approaches considered but not pursued] </attempted_approaches> <critical_context> [All essential knowledge for continuing: - Key decisions and trade-offs - Constraints, requirements, or boundaries - Important discoveries, gotcas, or edge cases - Environment, configuration, or setup details - Assumptions requiring validation - References to documentation, sources, or resources] </critical_context> <current_state> [Exact state of the work: - Status of deliverables (complete/in-progress/not started) - What's finalized vs. what's temporary or draft - Temporary changes or workarounds in place - Current position in workflow or process - Any open questions or pending decisions] </current_state> ```
Expert skill auditor for Claude Code Skills. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating SKILL.md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a skill.
Expert slash command auditor for Claude Code slash commands. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating slash command .md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a slash command.
Expert subagent auditor for Claude Code subagents. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating subagent configuration files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a subagent.
Add todo item to TO-DOS.md with context from conversation
Gather requirements through adaptive questioning before executing any task
Heal skill documentation by applying corrections discovered during execution with approval workflow
Audit slash command file for YAML, arguments, dynamic context, tool restrictions, and content quality
Audit subagent configuration for role definition, prompt quality, tool selection, XML structure compliance, and effectiveness