Slash Command303 repo starsupdated 9d ago

review

Get an independent cross-model review of the current diff from Antigravity (Gemini), then reconcile as the final judge.

View source Repository: antigravity-for-claude-code

Install in Claude Code

Copy

mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/HEAD/commands/review.md -o ~/.claude/commands/review.md

Then start a new Claude Code session; the slash command loads automatically.

Definition

review.md

Use Antigravity (`agy` / Gemini) as an **independent, different-model reviewer** of the
current changes, then reconcile the findings yourself (you are the final judge).

Scope/flags: $ARGUMENTS

Do this:
1. Capture the diff: `git diff` (or the range/paths in the scope above; default to
   uncommitted + last commit if unspecified).
2. Delegate the review to agy (pro tier) — pipe the diff in on stdin:
   `git diff | agy-delegate --tier pro -`
   (This runs as YOU, the conductor. The `antigravity-delegate` subagent cannot pipe —
   its PreToolUse gate refuses every pipeline since GHSA-hwv2-vjgj-8rcv, because `git`
   with arbitrary arguments executes arbitrary commands and `cat` feeding the wrapper
   ships any file to the external model. If you delegate this step, pass `--dir`.)
   with an instruction to find correctness/security/performance bugs, be skeptical, and
   list each as `file:line — issue`. If `--adversarial` is set, also have it challenge the
   design decisions and tradeoffs, not just line bugs.
3. **Reconcile**: for each finding, corroborate it against the actual code. Drop false
   positives; keep what's real. Agreement across two model families is a stronger signal;
   disagreement is a prompt to look closer.
4. Report the reconciled findings (most severe first) and your verdict.