Open protocol for scoring AI investments. JSON Schema, scoring engine, MCP server. Spec under CC-BY-4.0.
git clone https://github.com/Craig-Horton/ai-bvf && cp ai-bvf/*.md ~/.claude/agents/Subagents overview
# AI BVF MCP: Stop Bad AI Projects Before Agents Recommend Them
The scoring tool your Claude agent calls before it recommends an AI deployment. It checks the business case, operating-model readiness, change enablement, and governance exposure first, then returns **Accelerate**, **Fix**, or **Stop** with modelled EUR value, decision confidence, and a specific list of what to do next.
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/aibvf-mcp)
[](https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=aibvf)
[](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/Craig-Horton/ai-bvf)
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/aibvf-mcp)
[](https://github.com/Craig-Horton/ai-bvf/stargazers)
[](LICENSE)
> If you think AI agents should check business value, governance risk, and change readiness before recommending deployment, [star this repo](https://github.com/Craig-Horton/ai-bvf/stargazers). The signal helps other agents discover the BVF and keeps the benchmarks improving in public.
## What You Get Back
Ask your agent:
> Score a gen2 CX AI initiative for a EUR 400M retailer with traditional readiness, Strategic Alignment 70, Financial Return 50, Change Enablement 55, Governance Risk 45.
Expected shape of the answer:
```text
Classification: Fix
Decision confidence: 54
Net value range: EUR 10.8M-EUR 37.8M
Applied modules: four_pillar_base, readiness_capture_traditional, retail_cx_benchmark
Why: Strategic alignment is credible, but change enablement and financial return are not yet strong enough to defend an Accelerate call.
Next: raise Change Enablement by 15 points, name an accountable owner, fund adoption, and rerun recommend_improvements.
```
This is the missing pre-flight check for agentic AI work: not "can we build it?", but **should this work survive a board review?**
## What It Does
Thirteen tools, callable from any MCP-compatible agent over stdio (npx) or as a hosted remote connector at https://mcp.aibvf.com/api/mcp (claude.ai: Settings, Connectors, Add custom connector). The tool count is fixed through 0.15.x while the next two releases improve the route into the verdict.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `assess_ai_initiative` | Plain-English front door for one AI decision: resolves the five scoring inputs, asks one question when something is missing, then returns the verdict. |
| `score_initiative` | Four-pillar score returns Accelerate, Fix, or Stop with EUR value range, decision confidence, applied modules, reasoning. |
| `score_portfolio` | Scores every initiative in a BVF portfolio in one call and returns the board-level shape: Accelerate/Fix/Stop counts, aggregate EUR value, mean decision confidence, top initiative by value, highest-risk initiative. |
| `assemble_portfolio` | Assembles a valid BVF v1.0 portfolio document from loose inputs: names, plain-language functions and tiers, and whatever pillar scores exist. Aliases resolved, ids generated, missing pillars estimated with the estimation reported per initiative, document validated before return. Nothing stored, nothing edited. |
| `recommend_improvements` | For Stop or Fix, returns the specific pillar raises that would flip the call toward Accelerate. |
| `calculate_pace_layer_drag` | Annual Organisational Drag Cost in EUR from AI-tier vs operating-model misalignment. |
| `validate_portfolio` | Validates a portfolio JSON document against the BVF v1.0 schema. |
| `get_benchmark` | Looks up published benchmark rates for a business function and industry. |
| `list_taxonomy` | Returns valid values for industries, functions, AI tiers, readiness levels. |
| `diagnose_process` | AI BVF Advisor Brain: diagnoses one business process from observed signals (volume, labour, cycle time, handoffs, rework, automation, spend) and returns heaviness, intervention, net EUR saving, efficiency gain, verdict, and decision confidence. |
| `infer_readiness` | Measures organisational readiness from process signals (hand-offs, rework, touch ratio, automation, cycle time vs function medians) instead of accepting self-report. Returns the classification the data supports, per-signal reasoning, and a confidence set by coverage and agreement. When the measured answer is lower than the claimed one, that gap is itself a change-readiness finding. |
| `sequence_portfolio` | Turns a scored portfolio into a three-wave rollout plan with named gates: Stops first (free the budget), quick Accelerates second (buy trust), complex work and Fixes third. Enforces change capacity per function, because ten good ideas can still break an organisation if they all land in one place. |
| `map_to_taxonomy` | Maps everyday business language (customer service, procurement, banking, GenAI copilot, bureaucratic) onto the canonical enums, deterministically, with suggestions instead of guesses when there is no confident match. |
The portfolio chain, in order: `assemble_portfolio` gets messy inputs into the right shape, `validate_portfolio` checks the document, `score_portfolio` returns the verdicts, `sequence_portfolio` turns them into a rollout plan. The assembler structures, the scores advise.
## 30-Second Install
Run it directly:
```bash
npx -y aibvf-mcp
```
Or install globally:
```bash
npm install -g aibvf-mcp
```
Register with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any MCP client:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"aibvf": { "command": "aibvf-mcp" }
}
}
```
Ask your agent: "score a gen2 CX AI initiative for a 400M EUR retailer, traditional readiness, SA 70, FR 50, CE 55, GR 45," and the agent will call `score_initiative`, return a Fix classification with a concrete gap list, and offer to call `recommend_improvements` next.
## Why This Exists
Agents confidently recommend AI projects with no reference to the business case, no reference to operating-model readiness, and no reference to governance exposure. The scoring belongs upstream of the slide deck, inside the agent's pre-flight check before the budget gets committed.
The protocol is open, the benchmarks cite McKinsey, Gartner, BCG, Deloitte, Forrester, Accenture, ServiceNow, and readiness capture rates come from EY/Oxford and Prosci change-success research.
## About The Methodology
aibvf-mcp is the runtime arm of the AI Business Value Framework, the methodology I have been building since going independent in 2024 to evaluate AI investments against the measurable outcomes that survive a board review. The framework sits inside the AI Readiness Blueprint, a six-driver diagnostic informed by the EY/Oxford research on transformation success. The weekly applied case studies live in The Transformation Brief, where the calibration gets argued in public.
The advisory practice puts the framework in front of senior leaders making AI investment decisions inside enterprises with EUR 500m or more revenue. The MCP server makes the same scoring available to anyone running a Claude agent.
## The Four Pillars
Every initiative is scored on four pillars, 0 to 100, honest self-assessment.
1. **Strategic Alignment**, how clearly this moves a board-level KPI.
2. **Financial Return**, strength of the modelled return.
3. **Change Enablement**, sponsor in place, owner named, change budget funded.
4. **Governance Risk**, regulatory and reputational exposure. Higher value means more risk.
Rules are deterministic, no network, no dependencies. `GR >= 70` or `FR <= 20` returns Stop, all four pillars at or above 60 with `GR <= 40` returns Accelerate, anything else returns Fix with a specific gap list.
See `docs/scoring-formulas.md` for every formula and `docs/worked-example.md` for a full run on a healthcare portfolio.
## Example: Scoring an Agentic Healthcare Initiative
```js
import { score, recommendImprovements, calculatePaceLayerDrag } from '@aibvf/core';
const r = score({
industry: 'healthcare',
revenue_eur: 800_000_000,
function: 'cx',
ai_tier: 'gen3',
readiness: 'traditional',
scores: {
strategic_alignment: 75,
financial_return: 55,
change_enablement: 40,
governance_risk: 55,
},
});
// { classification: 'Fix', net_low_eur: 23_760_000, net_high_eur: 83_160_000,
// confidence: 54, applied_modules: ['four_pillar_base',
// 'readiness_capture_traditional', 'healthcare_clinical_validation',
// 'healthcare_regulatory_overhead'], ... }
```
Same inputs through `recommendImprovements` return three pillar raises, each with a named action, and project a new decision confidence of 68 with target classification Accelerate. `calculatePaceLayerDrag({ revenue_eur: 800_000_000, ai_tier: 'gen3', readiness: 'traditional' })` returns 20M to 36M EUR of annual Organisational Drag Cost, the structural friction cost of running gen3 in a traditional operating model, separate from the AI build.
## Packages
| Package | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| [`aibvf-mcp`](packages/mcp) | 0.13.0 | MCP server — 13 tools, stdio + hosted Streamable HTTP at mcp.aibvf.com. |
| [`aibvf-check`](packages/cli) | 0.1.1 | CI/CD pre-flight gate ("SonarQube for AI") + GitHub Action. |
| [`@aibvf/core`](packages/js) | 0.9.0 | TypeScript scoring engine, plain-English assessment, validator, change-leader plans, readiness inference, and Advisor Brain. |
| [`aibvf`](packages/py) | 0.2.0 | Python scoring engine and validator. |
## Anonymous Usage Telemetry
The MCP server reports a small anonymous payload on each tool call (`tool_name`, BVF version, taxonomy fields, a daily-rotated caller hash, and classification plus confidence for `score_initiative`) and a single `server_connect` event when the server first wires into a client. No portfolio content, no reWhat people ask about ai-bvf
What is Craig-Horton/ai-bvf?
+
Craig-Horton/ai-bvf is subagents for the Claude AI ecosystem. Open protocol for scoring AI investments. JSON Schema, scoring engine, MCP server. Spec under CC-BY-4.0. It has 0 GitHub stars and was last updated today.
How do I install ai-bvf?
+
You can install ai-bvf by cloning the repository (https://github.com/Craig-Horton/ai-bvf) or following the README instructions on GitHub. ClaudeWave also provides quick install blocks on this page.
Is Craig-Horton/ai-bvf safe to use?
+
Craig-Horton/ai-bvf has not been audited yet by our security agent. Review the original repository on GitHub before using it in production.
Who maintains Craig-Horton/ai-bvf?
+
Craig-Horton/ai-bvf is maintained by Craig-Horton. The last recorded GitHub activity is from today, with 5 open issues.
Are there alternatives to ai-bvf?
+
Yes. On ClaudeWave you can browse similar subagents at /categories/agents, sorted by popularity or recent activity.
Deploy ai-bvf to your cloud
Ship this repo to production in minutes. Each platform spins up its own environment with editable env vars.
Maintain this repo? Add a badge to your README
Drop the badge into your GitHub README to show it's tracked on ClaudeWave. Each badge links back to this page and reflects the live Trust Score.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/craig-horton-ai-bvf)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/craig-horton-ai-bvf"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/craig-horton-ai-bvf" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: Craig-Horton/ai-bvf" width="320" height="64" /></a>More Subagents
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
The agent that grows with you
Java 面试 & 后端通用面试指南,覆盖计算机基础、数据库、分布式、高并发、系统设计与 AI 应用开发
Build Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.
The agent engineering platform.
Turn any codebase, with its docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs, into a queryable knowledge graph. A /graphify skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI: local deterministic AST parsing, every edge explained, no vector store.