peg-valuation
PEG valuation, Price Earnings to Growth ratio, Peter Lynch PEG methodology, growth-adjusted valuation, earnings growth rate, PE ratio valuation, PEG sector comparison, undervalued growth stocks, fair value PEG
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentii-ai/agentii-investment-intelligence /tmp/peg-valuation && cp -r /tmp/peg-valuation/plugins/vertical-plugins/quantitative-analysis/skills/agentii/peg-valuation ~/.claude/skills/peg-valuationSKILL.md
# PEG Valuation
Peter Lynch PEG (Price/Earnings to Growth) methodology. PEG = P/E Ratio ÷ Earnings Growth Rate (%). Growth-adjusted valuation that answers: "Is this stock's growth justifying its multiple?"
## Preflight
Run the canonical pre-flight sequence — MCP health probe, ticker resolution, workspace `style.md` override, memory load, and coverage check. See `contracts/preflight.md`.
**`get_realtime_quote` availability **: If `get_realtime_quote` is not yet deployed, prompt user for current stock price. PE numerator from `search_earnings_calendar` (NTM consensus EPS × current price = PE) as fallback.
Include the `X-Agentii-Trace` header on every tool call per `contracts/x-agentii-trace-header.md`.
## Triggers
- PEG valuation for {ticker}
- compute PEG ratio {ticker}
- Peter Lynch PEG {ticker}
- growth-adjusted valuation {ticker}
- is {ticker} undervalued by PEG
- PEG analysis {ticker}
- price earnings growth {ticker}
- compare PEG across peers
- {ticker} PEG vs sector
- growth at reasonable price {ticker}
## Defaults
| Parameter | Default | Notes |
|-----------|---------|-------|
| growth_source | consensus | consensus estimates preferred; fallback to historical CAGR |
| include_peers | true | Sector PEG comparison |
| lookback_years | 3 | Historical CAGR computation window |
## Methodology
### Retrieval Scope
`structured_only` — PEG uses XBRL earnings data + real-time price + earnings calendar for growth estimates.
### Retrieval Strategy
See `contracts/retrieval.md` for the canonical decision tree; skill-specific retrieval detail is in `references/methodology.md`.
### Temporal Scope
Default: 4 fiscal quarters (max 12). PEG uses trailing 4 quarters for LTM P/E; up to 12 for historical EPS CAGR if consensus unavailable.
### Tool Allowlist
See frontmatter `allowed_tools` — 4 tools. `get_realtime_quote` for current price + PE (TTM). `search_earnings_calendar` for consensus EPS and long-term growth estimates. `search_xbrl_facts` for historical EPS to compute CAGR. `search_companies` for peer identification.
### Protocol
Step-by-step execution detail is in `references/methodology.md`.
### PEG Interpretation (Peter Lynch Framework)
| PEG Range | Rating | Investment Implication |
|-----------|--------|----------------------|
| < 0.5 | Deeply Undervalued | Growth vastly exceeds valuation; investigate for hidden risks |
| 0.5 – 1.0 | Undervalued | Classic Lynch buy zone; growth justifies the multiple |
| 1.0 – 1.5 | Fairly Valued | Growth and valuation in equilibrium |
| 1.5 – 2.0 | Premium | Market paying up for growth; needs above-consensus execution |
| > 2.0 | Overvalued | Growth insufficient to justify current multiple |
| Negative | N/A | Negative earnings — PEG not meaningful; use revenue-based metrics |
## Output File
Write the final deliverable to `{ticker}/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM}_peg-valuation_{affix}.md`.
## Output Structure
The deliverable is a structured markdown report written to the path in `## Output File`. Full section-by-section template (headings, tables, and field definitions) lives in `references/output-structure.md`. Required elements:
1. **Executive Summary** — headline conclusions (≤200 words).
2. **Core analysis sections** — per this skill's methodology and analyst modes.
3. **Data classification** — tag findings `[FACT]` / `[DEDUCTED]` / `[VIEW]` per `contracts/snapshot-synthesis.md`.
4. **Coverage Gaps & Citations** — inline `/v/` citations are PRIMARY (immediately after each fact); the bottom **Citations** section is a non-duplicative roll-up index.
5. **Output frontmatter** — emit the FR-090 structured block per `contracts/output-frontmatter-schema.md`.
**Citations & memory**: follow `contracts/citation-and-memory.md` — ≥1 citation per 200 words; every material fact, table row, and metric is immediately followed by its inline clickable `https://agentii.ai/v/{ticker}/{citation_id}/{N}` link; a bottom **Citations** section provides a non-duplicative roll-up index; the closing TUI reply includes a compact **Key Citations** list (headline 5–10 facts) of clickable `/v/` URLs; and append the run to `agentii.md` per `contracts/agentii-md-schema.md`.
## Tool Fallbacks
Per-tool failure modes and fallback actions are tabulated in `references/tool-fallbacks.md`.
## Memory & Snapshot
- **Memory load** (pre-flight): load prior workspace context for the ticker before retrieval — see `contracts/memory-load.md`.
- **Structured output frontmatter**: emit the FR-090 block (`key_metrics`, `conclusions`, `facts_count`, `deducted_count`, `views_count`, `citation_count`) per `contracts/output-frontmatter-schema.md`.
- **Snapshot synthesis**: after writing the deliverable, update the two-tier snapshot and classify findings as `[FACT]`/`[DEDUCTED]`/`[VIEW]` — see `contracts/snapshot-synthesis.md`.
- **Session archival**: record the run under `sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}/` and update `sessions/INDEX.md` per `contracts/session-format.md`.
## Final Summary (TUI)
End the closing chat reply with a compact **Key Citations** list (headline 5–10 facts), each a clickable `https://agentii.ai/v/{ticker}/{citation_id}/{N}` link, so the user can cmd+click straight to the exact SEC page. See `contracts/citation-and-memory.md`.
## Error Handling
| Failure Mode | Detection | Action | User-Facing Message |
|-------------|-----------|--------|---------------------|
| Missing data | No consensus or historical EPS | Halt; cannot compute growth rate | "Insufficient earnings data to compute growth rate for {ticker}." |
| Negative earnings | PE (TTM) < 0 | Compute only revenue-based metrics; flag PEG as N/A | "PEG not applicable — {ticker} has negative earnings." |
| Zero growth | CAGR ≈ 0% | PEG = ∞; flag as "no growth" case | "Zero historical EPS growth — PEG effectively infinite." |
| MCP unreachable | Preflight probe fails | Halt | "agentii data plane unreachable; check connection." |>-
Business model classification, business model analysis, structural analysis of how a company makes money, product offering decomposition, distribution channel analysis, customer segment analysis, revenue model identification, market sizing TAM SAM SOM, competitive positioning, business unit performance, management team & leadership analysis, what does the company sell, how does the company go to market, business model type platform service product, channel mix direct vs indirect, revenue concentration risk, CEO CFO executive backgrounds and changes
Competitive landscape analysis, competitor comparison, peer positioning, market share dynamics, competitive moat assessment, Porter five forces, industry competition, competitive advantage analysis, market positioning, strategic group mapping, compare competitors
Earnings sentiment analysis, analyst estimates vs guidance, earnings surprise history, consensus sentiment, earnings revision trends, analyst rating changes, earnings beat miss track record, guidance accuracy, whisper numbers, pre-announcement sentiment
Growth strategy analysis, organic growth decomposition, inorganic growth, M&A strategy, pipeline analysis, revenue growth drivers, strategic initiatives, expansion strategy, growth trajectory, product pipeline growth
Recent quarter performance analysis, quarterly earnings review, last quarter results, quarterly financial performance, analyze recent quarter, Q4 earnings, quarterly revenue breakdown, EPS this quarter, margin analysis recent quarter, sequential growth, quarterly performance review
Risk analysis, regulatory risk assessment, competitive risk, macro risk, technology risk, litigation risk, financial risk assessment, enterprise risk, operational risk, geopolitical risk exposure
Secular technology trends, technology adoption cycle, disruption risk, AI impact analysis, digital transformation, industry 4.0 trends, technology moat, innovation trajectory, R&D effectiveness, tech competitive positioning