tech-stack-evaluator

# Technology Stack Evaluator

A comprehensive evaluation framework for comparing technologies, frameworks, cloud providers, and complete technology stacks. Provides data-driven recommendations with TCO analysis, security assessment, ecosystem health scoring, and migration path analysis.

## Capabilities

This skill provides eight comprehensive evaluation capabilities:

- **Technology Comparison**: Head-to-head comparisons of frameworks, languages, and tools (React vs Vue, PostgreSQL vs MongoDB, Node.js vs Python)
- **Stack Evaluation**: Assess complete technology stacks for specific use cases (real-time collaboration, API-heavy SaaS, data-intensive platforms)
- **Maturity & Ecosystem Analysis**: Evaluate community health, maintenance status, long-term viability, and ecosystem strength
- **Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)**: Calculate comprehensive costs including licensing, hosting, developer productivity, and scaling
- **Security & Compliance**: Analyze vulnerabilities, compliance readiness (GDPR, SOC2, HIPAA), and security posture
- **Migration Path Analysis**: Assess migration complexity, risks, timelines, and strategies from legacy to modern stacks
- **Cloud Provider Comparison**: Compare AWS vs Azure vs GCP for specific workloads with cost and feature analysis
- **Decision Reports**: Generate comprehensive decision matrices with pros/cons, confidence scores, and actionable recommendations

## Input Requirements

### Flexible Input Formats (Automatic Detection)

The skill automatically detects and processes multiple input formats:

**Text/Conversational**:
```
"Compare React vs Vue for building a SaaS dashboard"
"Evaluate technology stack for real-time collaboration platform"
"Should we migrate from MongoDB to PostgreSQL?"
```

**Structured (YAML)**:
```yaml
comparison:
  technologies:
    - name: "React"
    - name: "Vue"
  use_case: "SaaS dashboard"
  priorities:
    - "Developer productivity"
    - "Ecosystem maturity"
    - "Performance"
```

**Structured (JSON)**:
```json
{
  "comparison": {
    "technologies": ["React", "Vue"],
    "use_case": "SaaS dashboard",
    "priorities": ["Developer productivity", "Ecosystem maturity"]
  }
}
```

**URLs for Ecosystem Analysis**:
- GitHub repository URLs (for health scoring)
- npm package URLs (for download statistics)
- Technology documentation URLs (for feature extraction)

### Analysis Scope Selection

Users can select which analyses to run:
- **Quick Comparison**: Basic scoring and comparison (200-300 tokens)
- **Standard Analysis**: Scoring + TCO + Security (500-800 tokens)
- **Comprehensive Report**: All analyses including migration paths (1200-1500 tokens)
- **Custom**: User selects specific sections (modular)

## Output Formats

### Context-Aware Output

The skill automatically adapts output based on environment:

**Claude Desktop (Rich Markdown)**:
- Formatted tables with color indicators
- Expandable sections for detailed analysis
- Visual decision matrices
- Charts and graphs (when appropriate)

**CLI/Terminal (Terminal-Friendly)**:
- Plain text tables with ASCII borders
- Compact formatting
- Clear section headers
- Copy-paste friendly code blocks

### Progressive Disclosure Structure

**Executive Summary (200-300 tokens)**:
- Recommendation summary
- Top 3 pros and cons
- Confidence level (High/Medium/Low)
- Key decision factors

**Detailed Breakdown (on-demand)**:
- Complete scoring matrices
- Detailed TCO calculations
- Full security analysis
- Migration complexity assessment
- All supporting data and calculations

### Report Sections (User-Selectable)

Users choose which sections to include:

1. **Scoring & Comparison Matrix**
   - Weighted decision scores
   - Head-to-head comparison tables
   - Strengths and weaknesses

2. **Financial Analysis**
   - TCO breakdown (5-year projection)
   - ROI analysis
   - Cost per user/request metrics
   - Hidden cost identification

3. **Ecosystem Health**
   - Community size and activity
   - GitHub stars, npm downloads
   - Release frequency and maintenance
   - Issue response times
   - Viability assessment

4. **Security & Compliance**
   - Vulnerability count (CVE database)
   - Security patch frequency
   - Compliance readiness (GDPR, SOC2, HIPAA)
   - Security scoring

5. **Migration Analysis** (when applicable)
   - Migration complexity scoring
   - Code change estimates
   - Data migration requirements
   - Downtime assessment
   - Risk mitigation strategies

6. **Performance Benchmarks**
   - Throughput/latency comparisons
   - Resource usage analysis
   - Scalability characteristics

## How to Use

### Basic Invocations

**Quick Comparison**:
```
"Compare React vs Vue for our SaaS dashboard project"
"PostgreSQL vs MongoDB for our application"
```

**Stack Evaluation**:
```
"Evaluate technology stack for real-time collaboration platform:
Node.js, WebSockets, Redis, PostgreSQL"
```

**TCO Analysis**:
```
"Calculate total cost of ownership for AWS vs Azure for our workload:
- 50 EC2/VM instances
- 10TB storage
- High bandwidth requirements"
```

**Security Assessment**:
```
"Analyze security posture of our current stack:
Express.js, MongoDB, JWT authentication.
Need SOC2 compliance."
```

**Migration Path**:
```
"Assess migration from Angular.js (1.x) to React.
Application has 50,000 lines of code, 200 components."
```

### Advanced Invocations

**Custom Analysis Sections**:
```
"Compare Next.js vs Nuxt.js.
Include: Ecosystem health, TCO, and performance benchmarks.
Skip: Migration analysis, compliance."
```

**Weighted Decision Criteria**:
```
"Compare cloud providers for ML workloads.
Priorities (weighted):
- GPU availability (40%)
- Cost (30%)
- Ecosystem (20%)
- Support (10%)"
```

**Multi-Technology Comparison**:
```
"Compare: React, Vue, Svelte, Angular for enterprise SaaS.
Use case: Large team (20+ developers), complex state management.
Generate comprehensive decision matrix."
```

## Scripts

### Core Modules

- **`stack_comparator.py`**: Main comparison engine with weig