Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill223 repo starsupdated yesterday

cross-national

# ClaudeWave: cross-national This Claude Code skill conducts end-to-end cross-national comparison studies using parallel nationally representative surveys such as KNHANES, NHANES, and CHNS. It harmonizes variables across datasets, performs country-stratified weighted analyses, and produces comparison tables for two-country or three-country designs. Use this skill when comparing clinical exposures and outcomes across Korea, the US, China, or similar survey pairs with available harmonization guidance.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills /tmp/cross-national && cp -r /tmp/cross-national/skills/cross-national ~/.claude/skills/cross-national
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Cross-National Comparison Study Skill

You are assisting a medical researcher in conducting a cross-national comparison study
using parallel nationally representative surveys (e.g., KNHANES for Korea, NHANES for the US, CHNS for China).

## When to Use

- Researcher has a clinical question to compare across two countries
- KNHANES + NHANES data available (or other parallel survey pairs)
- Goal: produce a complete analysis with country-stratified results + comparison table

## Inputs

1. **Research question**: exposure → outcome association to compare across countries
2. **Korean data path**: KNHANES CSV file
3. **US data path**: NHANES CSV directory (multiple tables to merge)
4. **Harmonization table** (optional): CSV mapping variables across surveys
   - Default: replicate-study skill's `harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv`

## Reference Files

- Harmonization table: `medsci-skills/skills/replicate-study/references/harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv`
- Upstream:
  - `medsci-skills/skills/write-paper/references/paper_types/cross_national.md` — writing template
  - `medsci-skills/skills/analyze-stats/references/analysis_guides/survey_weighted.md`

## Workflow

### Phase 1: Study Definition

1. Confirm research question: Exposure → Outcome
2. Define variable coding for both countries:
   - Exposure: PHQ-9, BMI category, smoking, etc.
   - Outcome: diabetes, hypertension, mortality, etc.
   - Covariates: age, sex, education, income, smoking, alcohol, obesity, CVD
3. Check harmonization table for variable availability
4. Output: study protocol summary for user approval

### Phase 2: Data Preparation

**KNHANES (single CSV)**:
1. Load CSV, filter age ≥20 (or per protocol)
2. Derive variables using KNHANES coding:
   - Smoking: BS3_1 (1,2=current, 3=former, 8=never)
   - Alcohol: BD1_11 (2-6=frequent, 1=occasional, 8=never)
   - Obesity: HE_obe (≥4=obesity for BMI≥25 Asian cutoff)
   - PHQ-9: BP_PHQ_1~9, sum score, ≥10=depression
   - Diabetes: HE_glu≥126 | HE_HbA1c≥6.5 | DE1_dg=1
   - CVD: DI4_dg=1 | DI5_dg=1 | DI6_dg=1
3. Set survey design: svydesign(id=~psu, strata=~kstrata, weights=~wt_itvex, nest=TRUE)

**NHANES (multiple CSVs)**:
1. Load and merge tables by SEQN (DEMO_J, DPQ_J, GHB_J, BIOPRO_J, BMX_J, SMQ_J, ALQ_J, DIQ_J, MCQ_J, BPQ_J)
2. Derive variables using NHANES coding:
   - Smoking: SMQ020 + SMQ040 (100 cigs + now smoke)
   - Alcohol: ALQ121 (past 12 mo frequency → categories)
   - Obesity: BMXBMI ≥30 (WHO cutoff, NOT Asian)
   - PHQ-9: DPQ010~DPQ090, sum score, ≥10=depression
   - Diabetes: LBXSGL≥126 | LBXGH≥6.5 | DIQ010=="Yes" (CRITICAL: LBXSGL not LBXSGLU)
   - CVD: MCQ160B=="Yes" (CHF) | MCQ160C=="Yes" (CHD) | MCQ160D=="Yes" (angina) | MCQ160E=="Yes" (MI)
   - HTN: BPXOSY3≥140 | BPXODI3≥90 | BPQ020=="Yes"
3. Set survey design: svydesign(id=~SDMVPSU, strata=~SDMVSTRA, weights=~WTMECPRP, nest=TRUE)

### Phase 3: Parallel Analysis

For EACH country independently:
1. **Table 1**: Baseline characteristics by exposure (weighted counts + percentages)
2. **Main analysis**: Sequential logistic regression models
   - Model 1 (unadjusted)
   - Model 2 (age + sex)
   - Model 3 (fully adjusted: + education, income, smoking, alcohol, obesity, CVD)
3. **Subgroup analyses**: By sex, age group, education, income, alcohol, smoking, CVD, obesity
4. **Dose-response** (if applicable): RCS with 3 knots

### Phase 4: Cross-National Comparison Table

Generate a side-by-side comparison:

| Analysis | Korea wOR (95% CI) | US wOR (95% CI) | Direction Agreement |
|----------|-------------------|-----------------|---------------------|
| Overall (fully adjusted) | ... | ... | ✓/✗ |
| Male | ... | ... | |
| Female | ... | ... | |
| ... | ... | ... | |

### Phase 5: Output Files

```
{working_dir}/
├── cross_national_report.md    — Study summary + comparison tables
├── variable_mapping.csv        — Variable mapping with match status
├── analysis_korea.R            — KNHANES analysis (self-contained)
├── analysis_us.R               — NHANES analysis (self-contained)
├── results/
│   ├── table1_korea.csv
│   ├── table1_us.csv
│   ├── main_results_comparison.csv
│   └── subgroup_comparison.csv
└── manuscript_draft/           — Optional: Methods + Results draft
    ├── methods_draft.md
    └── results_draft.md
```

## Critical Rules

1. **NEVER pool data across countries**. Each country analyzed with its own survey design.
2. **Country-specific BMI cutoffs**: Korea ≥25 (Asian), US ≥30 (WHO).
3. **Country-specific income**: KNHANES quartile, NHANES PIR → harmonize to binary.
4. **Weighted analysis mandatory**: Both KNHANES and NHANES are complex surveys.
5. **Document all harmonization decisions**: What matches, what needed recoding, what differs.
6. **Same analytic approach**: Identical model specifications for both countries for fair comparison.

## KNHANES Variable Coding Reference (validated via Joo 2026 replication)

| Variable | Raw Var | Coding |
|----------|---------|--------|
| Smoking | BS3_1 | 1,2=Current; 3=Former; 8=Never |
| Alcohol | BD1_11 | 2-6=Frequent (current drinker); 1=Occasional (past-year abstainer); 8=Never |
| Obesity | HE_obe | 1-3=Normal; 4-6=Obesity (BMI≥25) |
| Depression | BP_PHQ_1~9 | Sum ≥10 = depression |
| Diabetes | HE_glu, HE_HbA1c, DE1_dg | FPG≥126 or HbA1c≥6.5 or DE1_dg=1 |
| CVD | DI4_dg, DI5_dg, DI6_dg | Any = 1 → CVD yes |
| Education | edu | 1-3=Non-college; 4=College |
| Income | incm | 1-3=Bottom 80%; 4=Top 20% |
| Survey design | kstrata, psu, wt_itvex | strata, cluster, weight |

## NHANES Variable Coding Reference (validated via Joo 2026 cross-national)

**CRITICAL**: NHANES data downloaded via R `nhanesA` package uses TEXT LABELS, not numeric codes.

| Variable | Raw Var | Text Labels → Numeric |
|----------|---------|----------------------|
| PHQ-9 items | DPQ010~DPQ090 | "Not at all"→0, "Several days"→1, "More than half the days"→2, "Nearly every day"→3 |
| Sex | RIAGENDR | "Male" / "Female" (NOT 1/2) |
| Smoking (100 cigs) | SMQ020 | "Yes" / "No" |
| Smoking (no
skillsSkill
academic-aioSkill

Medical AI paper optimization for AI search engines (Perplexity, ChatGPT web, Elicit, Consensus, SciSpace) and RAG-based literature tools. Applies when drafting or reviewing titles, abstracts, structured summary boxes (Key Points / Research in Context / Plain-Language Summary), manuscripts for high-impact medical AI journals (Lancet Digital Health, Radiology, Radiology-AI, npj Digital Medicine, Nature Medicine), preprints (medRxiv/arXiv), GitHub README + CITATION.cff + Zenodo archives, and Hugging Face model/dataset cards. Integrates TRIPOD+AI, CLAIM 2024, STARD-AI, TRIPOD-LLM, DECIDE-AI reporting requirements with generative engine optimization (GEO) principles. Produces a visible pass/fail checklist.

add-journalSkill

>

analyze-statsSkill

Statistical analysis for medical research papers. Generates reproducible Python/R code with publication-ready tables and figures. Supports diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater agreement, meta-analysis, survival analysis, survey data, group comparisons, regression, propensity score, and repeated measures.

author-strategySkill

PubMed author profile analysis. Author name → PubMed fetch → study-type classification → visualization → strategy report → optional trajectory-archetype classification.

batch-cohortSkill

Generate N analysis scripts from a single methodology template × multiple exposure/outcome combinations. The "80-person team" pattern — same validated method, swap variables only. Produces batch R/Python code + summary matrix.

calc-sample-sizeSkill

>

check-reportingSkill

Check manuscript compliance with medical research reporting guidelines. Supports 36 guidelines including STROBE, CONSORT, CONSORT-AI, STARD, STARD-AI, TRIPOD, TRIPOD+AI, TRIPOD-LLM, ARRIVE, PRISMA, PRISMA-DTA, PRISMA-P, CARE, SPIRIT, SPIRIT-AI, CLAIM, DECIDE-AI, MI-CLEAR-LLM, SQUIRE 2.0, CLEAR, MOOSE, GRRAS, SWiM, AMSTAR 2, and risk of bias tools (QUADAS-2, QUADAS-C, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, ROBINS-E, ROBIS, ROB-ME, PROBAST, PROBAST+AI, NOS, COSMIN, RoB NMA). Generates item-by-item assessment with PRESENT/MISSING/PARTIAL status.