Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill843 repo starsupdated 4d ago

drug-discovery

This Claude Code skill supports computational drug discovery by identifying therapeutic targets, screening compound libraries against those targets, predicting drug properties like absorption and toxicity, optimizing lead molecules through structure-activity analysis, and modeling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Activate it when users discuss drug targets, virtual screening, ADMET prediction, lead optimization, or drug repurposing using molecular docking, cheminformatics databases, and prediction tools like SwissADME or pkCSM.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw /tmp/drug-discovery && cp -r /tmp/drug-discovery/skills/drug-discovery ~/.claude/skills/drug-discovery
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

## When to Trigger

Activate this skill when the user mentions:
- Drug target identification, druggability assessment
- Virtual screening, molecular docking, pharmacophore
- ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity)
- Lead optimization, SAR (structure-activity relationship)
- Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), PK/PD modeling
- Drug repurposing, off-label, drug-disease associations
- SMILES, InChI, compound libraries, chemical fingerprints
- IC50, EC50, Ki, dose-response curves

## Step-by-Step Methodology

1. **Target identification and validation** - Identify therapeutic target from literature, GWAS hits, or omics data. Assess druggability using Open Targets, DGIdb, or structural pocket analysis. Confirm target-disease association strength.
2. **Compound sourcing** - Search ChEMBL, PubChem, ZINC, or DrugBank for known active compounds. For novel scaffolds, consider de novo design tools (REINVENT, MolGPT).
3. **Virtual screening** - Structure-based: dock compound library against target (AutoDock Vina, Glide). Ligand-based: use pharmacophore models or molecular fingerprint similarity. Filter by drug-likeness (Lipinski Ro5, Veber rules).
4. **ADMET prediction** - Predict absorption (Caco-2 permeability, logP), distribution (plasma protein binding, Vd), metabolism (CYP inhibition/induction), excretion (clearance), and toxicity (hERG, hepatotoxicity, AMES mutagenicity). Use SwissADME, pkCSM, or ADMETlab.
5. **Lead optimization** - Analyze SAR from dose-response data. Identify key pharmacophoric features. Suggest modifications to improve potency, selectivity, or ADMET profile while maintaining drug-likeness.
6. **PK/PD modeling** - Build compartmental PK models. Estimate key parameters: Cmax, Tmax, AUC, half-life, bioavailability. For PD, model dose-response (Emax model, Hill equation).
7. **Drug repurposing analysis** - Query drug-gene interaction databases. Analyze shared pathways between drug targets and disease mechanisms. Check clinical trial databases for existing evidence.

## Key Databases and Tools

- **ChEMBL** - Bioactivity data for drug-like compounds
- **PubChem** - Chemical structure and bioassay data
- **DrugBank** - Drug and target information
- **Open Targets** - Target-disease associations
- **ZINC** - Purchasable compound library
- **SwissADME / pkCSM** - ADMET prediction tools
- **BindingDB** - Protein-ligand binding data

## Output Format

- Compound results as tables: SMILES, molecular weight, logP, key activity (IC50/EC50), ADMET flags.
- Docking results: binding energy (kcal/mol), key interactions, pose description.
- PK parameters: Cmax, Tmax, AUC, t1/2, clearance, bioavailability with units.
- SAR analysis: matched molecular pair comparisons with activity changes.

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Target-disease association supported by evidence (genetic, functional)
- [ ] Drug-likeness filters applied (Lipinski, Veber, PAINS)
- [ ] ADMET predictions include confidence levels or applicability domain
- [ ] Docking validated against known co-crystal structures when available
- [ ] IC50/EC50 reported with assay conditions and confidence intervals
- [ ] PK parameters include units and species (human vs. preclinical)
- [ ] Known liabilities (hERG, CYP inhibition, reactive metabolites) flagged
- [ ] Comparison to existing drugs/compounds for the same target included