get-unpublished-changes
This Claude Code skill analyzes unpublished commits in the oh-my-openagent repository to identify changes since the last npm release, categorizing them across three architectural layers: pure components (reusable packages), OpenCode/OpenAgent (core platform), and LazyCodex (marketplace integration). Use it when preparing release notes, determining version bumps, or understanding what features and fixes are pending publication across different product components.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent /tmp/get-unpublished-changes && cp -r /tmp/get-unpublished-changes/.agents/skills/get-unpublished-changes ~/.claude/skills/get-unpublished-changesSKILL.md
IMMEDIATELY output the analysis. NO questions. NO preamble.
## CRITICAL: DO NOT just copy commit messages!
For each commit, you MUST:
1. Read the actual diff to understand WHAT CHANGED
2. Describe the REAL change in plain language
3. Explain WHY it matters (if not obvious)
## Release Layers
Analyze every change against these exact layers:
| Layer | Includes | Version question |
|---|---|---|
| `omo pure components` | `packages/*-core`, MCP packages, `packages/shared-skills`, reusable scripts | Do shared components need a patch/minor/major release note even if adapters only consume them internally? |
| `omo opencode` | Root `oh-my-opencode` / `oh-my-openagent`, `src/`, `.opencode/`, `.agents/`, CLI, config, hooks, tools, docs | What semver bump should the OpenCode/OpenAgent npm packages use? |
| `omo codex` | `packages/omo-codex`, `lazycodex-ai`, Codex plugin metadata/hooks, bundled MCP runtimes, `code-yeongyu/lazycodex` marketplace payload | Does LazyCodex need the same bump, a Codex-only note, or a marketplace release? |
Exclude commits and paths matching `senpi`, `omo-senpi`, `senpi-task`, `pi-goal`, or `pi-webfetch` from user-facing notes and version recommendations. Record them only in a separate internal-adapter exclusion ledger.
## Steps:
1. Detect latest published versions for `oh-my-opencode`, `oh-my-openagent`, and `lazycodex-ai`.
2. Run `git diff v{published-version}..HEAD` to see actual changes.
3. Classify every file into one or more release layers before grouping by feat/fix/refactor/docs.
4. Describe the REAL changes and why each layer cares.
5. Note breaking changes by affected layer.
6. Recommend a layer-specific version bump and one overall workflow bump.
## Output Format:
- feat: "Added X that does Y" (not just "add X feature")
- fix: "Fixed bug where X happened, now Y" (not just "fix X bug")
- refactor: "Changed X from A to B, now supports C" (not just "rename X")
Include:
- `Layered Impact Matrix`: rows for `omo pure components`, `omo opencode`, `omo codex`
- `Layer-specific Version Recommendation`: patch/minor/major per layer plus one overall release bumpRead-only GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. 1 item = 1 background task (category: quick). Analyzes all open items and writes evidence-backed reports to /tmp/{datetime}/. Every claim requires a GitHub permalink as proof. NEVER takes any action on GitHub - no comments, no merges, no closes, no labels. Reports only. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill for omo-senpi. Self-orchestrates a 5-member hostile team (categories unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via the native lead team tools for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the insights that survive the attacks, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled bundle to a planner task (load_skills ulw-plan) for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.
Easter egg command - about oh-my-opencode. Triggers: omomomo, about, easter egg.
QA opencode itself, per case: verify the CLI/terminal (opencode run, db, serve, export), prove a specific plugin hook/action/event fired via the SSE event stream, smoke-test the TUI under tmux, and investigate sessions in opencode's SQLite DB by id, title/name, or message text. Ships tested helper scripts (each with a --self-test) plus per-domain references. Use whenever someone wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug opencode's CLI, HTTP server, plugin hooks/events, or TUI, or to find/inspect opencode sessions in the database. Triggers: opencode qa, qa opencode, test opencode, verify opencode hook, opencode session db, find opencode session by id/name/text, opencode tui test, opencode server health, opencode event stream.
Nuclear-grade 16-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (5 agents) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.
Publish oh-my-opencode to npm by triggering the GitHub Actions publish workflow and verifying its artifacts. Ship-only: never runs pre-publish-review or re-reviews merged code unless the user explicitly asks. Argument: <patch|minor|major|explicit-semver>. Triggers: publish, release, deploy, npm publish.
Remove unused code from this project with ultrawork mode, LSP-verified safety, atomic commits. Triggers: remove dead code, dead code, cleanup, remove unused.