evaluating-llms-harness
The lm-evaluation-harness is a standardized benchmarking framework that evaluates large language models across 60+ academic benchmarks including MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, TruthfulQA, and HellaSwag using consistent prompts and metrics. Use this tool when comparing model performance, reporting academic results, tracking training progress, or conducting rigorous model quality assessments across reasoning, math, coding, and factuality dimensions.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates /tmp/evaluating-llms-harness && cp -r /tmp/evaluating-llms-harness/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/evaluation-lm-evaluation-harness ~/.claude/skills/evaluating-llms-harnessSKILL.md
# lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking
## Quick start
lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.
**Installation**:
```bash
pip install lm-eval
```
**Evaluate any HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size 8
```
**View available tasks**:
```bash
lm_eval --tasks list
```
## Common workflows
### Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation
Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).
Copy this checklist:
```
Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results
```
**Step 1: Choose benchmark suite**
**Core reasoning benchmarks**:
- **MMLU** (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
- **GSM8K** - Grade school math word problems
- **HellaSwag** - Common sense reasoning
- **TruthfulQA** - Truthfulness and factuality
- **ARC** (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions
**Code benchmarks**:
- **HumanEval** - Python code generation (164 problems)
- **MBPP** (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding
**Standard suite** (recommended for model releases):
```bash
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge
```
**Step 2: Configure model**
**HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size auto # Auto-detect optimal batch size
```
**Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit)**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Custom checkpoint**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=/path/to/my-model,tokenizer=/path/to/tokenizer \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Step 3: Run evaluation**
```bash
# Full MMLU evaluation (57 subjects)
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu \
--num_fewshot 5 \ # 5-shot evaluation (standard)
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/ \
--log_samples # Save individual predictions
# Multiple benchmarks at once
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/llama2-7b-eval.json
```
**Step 4: Analyze results**
Results saved to `results/llama2-7b-eval.json`:
```json
{
"results": {
"mmlu": {
"acc": 0.459,
"acc_stderr": 0.004
},
"gsm8k": {
"exact_match": 0.142,
"exact_match_stderr": 0.006
},
"hellaswag": {
"acc_norm": 0.765,
"acc_norm_stderr": 0.004
}
},
"config": {
"model": "hf",
"model_args": "pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
"num_fewshot": 5
}
}
```
### Workflow 2: Track training progress
Evaluate checkpoints during training.
```
Training Progress Tracking:
- [ ] Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation
- [ ] Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks
- [ ] Step 3: Automate evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Plot learning curves
```
**Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation**
Evaluate every N training steps:
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_checkpoint.sh
CHECKPOINT_DIR=$1
STEP=$2
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$CHECKPOINT_DIR/checkpoint-$STEP \
--tasks gsm8k,hellaswag \
--num_fewshot 0 \ # 0-shot for speed
--batch_size 16 \
--output_path results/step-$STEP.json
```
**Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks**
Fast benchmarks for frequent evaluation:
- **HellaSwag**: ~10 minutes on 1 GPU
- **GSM8K**: ~5 minutes
- **PIQA**: ~2 minutes
Avoid for frequent eval (too slow):
- **MMLU**: ~2 hours (57 subjects)
- **HumanEval**: Requires code execution
**Step 3: Automate evaluation**
Integrate with training script:
```python
# In training loop
if step % eval_interval == 0:
model.save_pretrained(f"checkpoints/step-{step}")
# Run evaluation
os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
```
Or use PyTorch Lightning callbacks:
```python
from pytorch_lightning import Callback
class EvalHarnessCallback(Callback):
def on_validation_epoch_end(self, trainer, pl_module):
step = trainer.global_step
checkpoint_path = f"checkpoints/step-{step}"
# Save checkpoint
trainer.save_checkpoint(checkpoint_path)
# Run lm-eval
os.system(f"lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained={checkpoint_path} ...")
```
**Step 4: Plot learning curves**
```python
import json
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load all results
steps = []
mmlu_scores = []
for file in sorted(glob.glob("results/step-*.json")):
with open(file) as f:
data = json.load(f)
step = int(file.split("-")[1].split(".")[0])
steps.append(step)
mmlu_scores.append(data["results"]["mmlu"]["acc"])
# Plot
plt.plot(steps, mmlu_scores)
plt.xlabel("Training Step")
plt.ylabel("MMLU Accuracy")
plt.title("Training Progress")
plt.savefig("training_curve.png")
```
### Workflow 3: Compare multiple models
Benchmark suite for model comparison.
```
Model Comparison:
- [ ] Step 1: Define model list
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluations
- [ ] Step 3: Generate comparison table
```
**Step 1: Define model list**
```bash
# models.txt
meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf
meta-llama/Llama-2-13b-hf
mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1
microsoft/phi-2
```
**Step 2: Run evaluations**
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_all_models.sh
TASKS="mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa"
while read model; do
echo "Evaluating $model"
# Extract model name for output file
model_name=$(echo $model | sed 's/\//-/g')
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$model,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks $TASKS \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size auto \
--output_path results/$model_name.json
done < models.txt
```Use this agent when creating specialized Claude Code agents for the claude-code-templates components system. Specializes in agent design, prompt engineering, domain expertise modeling, and agent best practices. Examples: <example>Context: User wants to create a new specialized agent. user: 'I need to create an agent that specializes in React performance optimization' assistant: 'I'll use the agent-expert agent to create a comprehensive React performance agent with proper domain expertise and practical examples' <commentary>Since the user needs to create a specialized agent, use the agent-expert agent for proper agent structure and implementation.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User needs help with agent prompt design. user: 'How do I create an agent that can handle both frontend and backend security?' assistant: 'Let me use the agent-expert agent to design a full-stack security agent with proper domain boundaries and expertise areas' <commentary>The user needs agent development help, so use the agent-expert agent.</commentary></example>
Use this agent to create blog articles for aitmpl.com from Claude Code Templates components. Reads the component, asks the user to confirm details, generates SVG cover, HTML article, and updates blog-articles.json. Examples: <example>Context: User wants a blog for a component. user: 'Create a blog article for cli-tool/components/hooks/security/secret-scanner.json' assistant: 'I'll use the blog-writer agent to create the full blog article with cover image and proper structure' <commentary>The user wants a blog article from a component, use blog-writer for the full pipeline.</commentary></example>
Runs pre-deploy build checks on the dashboard. Validates Astro build, checks for common esbuild/JSX issues, verifies API endpoints compile, and reports errors with fixes. Use before merging PRs that touch dashboard/.
Regenerates the component catalog (docs/components.json) by running the Python script. Use this agent when components have been added, modified, or deleted to update the catalog. Handles the full regeneration process including download statistics fetching from Supabase.
CLI interface design specialist. Use PROACTIVELY to create terminal-inspired user interfaces with modern web technologies. Expert in CLI aesthetics, terminal themes, and command-line UX patterns.
Use this agent when creating CLI commands for the claude-code-templates components system. Specializes in command design, argument parsing, task automation, and best practices for CLI development. Examples: <example>Context: User wants to create a new CLI command. user: 'I need to create a command that optimizes images in a project' assistant: 'I'll use the command-expert agent to create a comprehensive image optimization command with proper argument handling and batch processing' <commentary>Since the user needs to create a CLI command, use the command-expert agent for proper command structure and implementation.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User needs help with command argument parsing. user: 'How do I create a command that accepts multiple file patterns?' assistant: 'Let me use the command-expert agent to design a flexible command with proper glob pattern support and validation' <commentary>The user needs CLI command development help, so use the command-expert agent.</commentary></example>
Applies researched improvements to Claude Code components, validates changes with the component-reviewer agent, and creates pull requests. The only agent that modifies files and creates PRs.
Migrates components (agents, commands, skills, hooks, settings, MCPs) from external GitHub repositories to claude-code-templates, validates them with component-reviewer, and regenerates the catalog