oma-coordination
oma-coordination guides manual step-by-step coordination of PM, frontend, backend, mobile, and QA agents on complex multi-domain projects. Use this skill when a feature or project spans multiple specialist domains and requires explicit workflow guidance, task decomposition, parallel agent spawning by priority tier, and contract alignment checkpoints rather than fully automated orchestration.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/first-fluke/oh-my-agent /tmp/oma-coordination && cp -r /tmp/oma-coordination/benchmarks/runs/oma/.agents/skills/oma-coordination ~/.claude/skills/oma-coordinationSKILL.md
# Multi-Agent Workflow Guide
## Scheduling
### Goal
Guide manual multi-agent coordination for complex work that spans PM, frontend, backend, mobile, and QA responsibilities.
### Intent signature
- User wants step-by-step coordination, manual agent spawning, or multi-domain work planning without full automation.
- Task spans multiple specialist agents and requires contract alignment.
### When to use
- Complex feature spanning multiple domains (full-stack, mobile)
- Coordination needed between frontend, backend, mobile, and QA
- User wants step-by-step guidance for multi-agent coordination
### When NOT to use
- Simple single-domain task -> use the specific agent directly
- User wants automated execution -> use orchestrator
- Quick bug fixes or minor changes
### Expected inputs
- Complex feature or project goal
- Required domains and priority tiers
- Workspace/session constraints and API/data contract needs
### Expected outputs
- Manual coordination sequence
- PM task decomposition, agent spawn order, monitoring guidance, and QA review step
- API/data contract alignment checkpoints
### Dependencies
- PM, frontend, backend, mobile, QA, and orchestrator skills
- `resources/examples.md`
- CLI `oma agent:spawn` and progress/result memory conventions
### Control-flow features
- Branches by task complexity, priority tiers, dependency ordering, and whether automation is desired
- Spawns independent same-priority tasks in parallel when appropriate
- Monitors progress files and contract alignment
## Structural Flow
### Entry
1. Confirm the task is complex enough for multi-agent coordination.
2. Start with PM task decomposition.
3. Identify priority tiers and shared contracts.
### Scenes
1. **PREPARE**: Define session, domains, and task decomposition needs.
2. **ACT**: Spawn agents by priority with separate workspaces.
3. **VERIFY**: Monitor progress and API/data contract alignment.
4. **FINALIZE**: Run QA review and coordinate remediation.
### Transitions
- If task is simple, route to one specialist.
- If user wants automated execution, use orchestrator.
- If QA finds CRITICAL issues, re-spawn responsible agents.
### Failure and recovery
- If contracts diverge, pause downstream frontend/mobile work until backend/API contract is reconciled.
- If agent workspaces conflict, split ownership boundaries.
- If progress stalls, inspect progress files and reissue focused instructions.
### Exit
- Success: specialist outputs are coordinated and QA-reviewed.
- Partial success: blocked agents, contract conflicts, or QA failures are explicit.
## Logical Operations
### Actions
| Action | SSL primitive | Evidence |
|--------|---------------|----------|
| Read request and domains | `READ` | User prompt and project context |
| Select agent plan | `SELECT` | PM decomposition and priority tiers |
| Spawn agents | `CALL_TOOL` | `oma agent:spawn` |
| Monitor progress | `READ` | `progress-{agent}.md` |
| Validate contracts | `VALIDATE` | API/data model alignment |
| Notify coordination status | `NOTIFY` | Final coordination summary |
### Tools and instruments
- `oma agent:spawn`, PM/frontend/backend/mobile/QA agents
- Memory/progress/result files
- Serena MCP for exploration and modification when used by specialists
### Canonical command path
```bash
oma agent:spawn pm "<planning task>" <session-id> -w ./pm
oma agent:spawn backend "<backend task>" <session-id> -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend "<frontend task>" <session-id> -w ./frontend &
wait
```
### Resource scope
| Scope | Resource target |
|-------|-----------------|
| `LOCAL_FS` | Progress/result files and workspaces |
| `PROCESS` | Agent spawn commands |
| `MEMORY` | Session state and task board |
| `CODEBASE` | Shared contracts and implementation areas |
### Preconditions
- Task requires multiple domains.
- PM decomposition can identify independent priority tiers.
### Effects and side effects
- Spawns or guides multiple agents.
- Coordinates workspace ownership and QA feedback.
### Guardrails
1. Always start with PM Agent for task decomposition
2. Spawn independent tasks in parallel (same priority tier)
3. Define API contracts before frontend/mobile tasks
4. QA review is always the final step
5. Assign separate workspaces to avoid file conflicts
6. Always use Serena MCP tools as the primary method for code exploration and modification
7. Never skip steps in the workflow — follow each step sequentially without omission
### Workflow
### Step 1: Plan with PM Agent
PM Agent analyzes requirements, selects tech stack, creates task breakdown with priorities.
### Step 2: Spawn Agents by Priority
Spawn agents via CLI:
1. Use spawn-agent.sh for each task
2. CLI selection follows agent_cli_mapping in oma-config.yaml
3. Spawn all same-priority tasks in parallel using background processes
```bash
# Example: spawn backend and frontend in parallel
oma agent:spawn backend "task description" session-id -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend "task description" session-id -w ./frontend &
wait
```
### Step 3: Monitor & Coordinate
- Use memory read tool to poll `progress-{agent}.md` files
- Verify API contracts align between agents
- Ensure shared data models are consistent
### Step 4: QA Review
Spawn QA Agent last to review all deliverables. Address CRITICAL issues by re-spawning agents.
### Automated Alternative
For fully automated execution without manual spawning, use the **orchestrator** skill instead.
## References
- Workflow examples: `resources/examples.md`>
Architecture specialist for software/system design, module and service boundaries, tradeoff analysis, and stakeholder synthesis. Uses context-aware methods such as diagnostic routing, design-twice comparison, ATAM-style risk analysis, CBAM-style prioritization, and ADR-style decision records.
Backend specialist for APIs, databases, authentication with clean architecture (Repository/Service/Router pattern). Use for API, endpoint, REST, database, server, migration, and auth work.
Design-first ideation that explores user intent, constraints, and approaches before any planning or implementation. Use for brainstorming, ideation, exploring concepts, and evaluating approaches.
Database specialist for SQL, NoSQL, and vector database modeling, schema design, normalization, indexing, transactions, integrity, concurrency control, backup, capacity planning, data standards, anti-pattern review, and compliance-aware database design. Use for database, schema, ERD, table design, document model, vector index design, RAG retrieval architecture, migration, query tuning, glossary, capacity estimation, backup strategy, database anti-pattern remediation work, and ISO 27001, ISO 27002, or ISO 22301-aware database recommendations.
Bug diagnosis and fixing specialist - analyzes errors, identifies root causes, provides fixes, and writes regression tests. Use for bug, debug, error, crash, traceback, exception, and regression work.
>
>