research-ideation
# ClaudeWave Item Description The research-ideation skill guides users through the research project initiation phase, from initial concept to actionable planning. It employs the 5W1H framework for idea brainstorming, conducts systematic literature reviews with Zotero integration, identifies research gaps across multiple dimensions, and formulates specific research questions using SMART principles. Use this skill when beginning a research project, defining research questions, conducting gap analysis, planning methodology, or selecting appropriate research methods.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar /tmp/research-ideation && cp -r /tmp/research-ideation/skills/research-ideation ~/.claude/skills/research-ideationSKILL.md
# Research Ideation
Supports the complete workflow for the research project initiation phase, from vague idea to a traceable research contract: research question, hypothesis, evidence needs, falsification criteria, method selection, and next action.
## Core Features
### 1. Idea Brainstorming (5W1H Framework)
Systematically brainstorm research ideas using the 5W1H framework:
- **What**: What problem or phenomenon to study
- **Why**: Why this problem is important
- **Who**: Target audience and stakeholders
- **When**: Time scope and context of the research
- **Where**: Application scenarios and domains
- **How**: Preliminary research methodology ideas
**Integration with superpowers:brainstorming**: Can invoke the superpowers:brainstorming skill for interactive brainstorming to help rapidly generate and evaluate research ideas.
### 2. Literature Review
Systematically search, analyze, and synthesize related literature:
- Build effective search keywords
- Search via WebSearch across academic databases (arXiv, Google Scholar, etc.)
- Screen and evaluate paper quality
- Identify research trends and gaps
- Generate structured literature reviews from evidence-labeled sources
- **Zotero Integration**: Papers are automatically added to Zotero via DOI, organized into topic-based collections, and open-access PDFs are auto-attached for full-text reading
### 3. Gap Analysis
Systematically identify and evaluate research gaps:
- **Literature gaps**: Identify topics or questions not yet sufficiently studied
- **Methodological gaps**: Discover limitations and improvement opportunities in existing methods
- **Application gaps**: Identify opportunities for theory-to-practice transfer
- **Interdisciplinary gaps**: Discover research opportunities at the intersection of different fields
- **Temporal gaps**: Identify new research needs arising from changes over time
**Analysis Dimensions:**
- Coverage of research topics
- Comparison of strengths and weaknesses of existing methods
- Completeness of experimental setups
- Availability of datasets and benchmarks
- Gap between theory and practice
### 4. Research Question Definition
Formulate specific research questions based on literature analysis:
- Identify research gaps and opportunities
- Apply SMART principles to formulate questions
- Evaluate importance, novelty, and feasibility
- Define research objectives and expected contributions
- Write a `Research Question Card` that states the hypothesis, current evidence, missing evidence, support criteria, falsification criteria, and minimal next action
- Apply the proposal readiness gate before turning a card into a polished proposal
### 5. Method Selection
Select appropriate research methods:
- Analyze strengths and weaknesses of existing methods
- Evaluate method applicability
- Identify required technologies and resources
- Consider method feasibility
### 6. Research Planning
Develop detailed research plans:
- Plan research timeline
- Define milestones and deliverables
- Identify potential risks
- Assess resource requirements
## When to Use
### Scenarios for This Skill
Use the research-ideation skill in the following situations:
1. **Starting a new research project** - Have research interests but no clear research question yet
2. **Literature review** - Need to systematically understand a research field
3. **Research question formulation** - Need to transform vague ideas into specific research questions
4. **Method selection** - Need to choose appropriate research methods and technical approaches
5. **Research planning** - Need to plan research timeline and resources
### Typical Workflow
```
Research interest → Idea brainstorming (5W1H) → Research Question Card → Evidence Records → Gap analysis → Proposal readiness gate → Select method or experiment → Decision
```
**Conditional Outputs:**
- `research-question-card.md` - Always generate this for research startup or intake.
- `literature-review.md` - Generate only when evidence-labeled sources are sufficient for synthesis.
- `research-proposal.md` - Generate only when a selected Research Question Card passes the evidence gate.
- `references.bib` - Generate only when reliable citation metadata exists.
- Zotero collection with organized papers and PDFs - Create only when Zotero is configured, writable, and the user is not asking for dry-run/audit mode.
## Integration with Other Systems
### Complete Research Workflow
```
research-ideation (Research initiation)
↓
Experiment execution (completed by user)
↓
results-analysis (Results analysis)
↓
ml-paper-writing (Paper writing)
```
### Data Flow
- **Research Question Card** → Guides literature scope, experiment design, and method selection
- **Evidence Records** → Carry source type, claim strength, and allowed/forbidden wording into literature synthesis, project knowledge, and later claim audit
- **Proposal Readiness Gate** → Prevents abstract-only or webpage-placeholder evidence from becoming a polished proposal
- **Experimental results** → results-analysis for statistical analysis and claim candidates
- **Analysis results** → results-report and ml-paper-writing with explicit evidence limits
### Zotero Integration
Through the Zotero MCP server, the research-ideation workflow automates literature management:
- **Paper Discovery**: WebSearch finds relevant papers across academic databases
- **Auto-Import**: Extract DOI / arXiv ID / landing-page URLs from search results, then use `zotero_add_items_by_identifier` to prefer paper/preprint imports before any webpage fallback
- **Collection Organization**: `zotero_create_collection` creates topic-based collections with standard sub-collections (Core Papers, Methods, Applications, Baselines, To-Read)
- **PDF Attachment**: `zotero_add_items_by_identifier(..., attach_pdf=true)` runs a PDF cascade (landing-page PDF hints → direct PDF → Unpaywall), and `zotero_find_and_attach_pdfs` can be used as a follow-up sweep for remaining items
- **FulExpert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code. MUST BE USED for all code changes.
Use this agent when the user provides a Kaggle competition URL or asks to learn from Kaggle winning solutions. Examples:
Use this agent when the user asks to "conduct literature review", "search for papers", "analyze research papers", "identify research gaps", "review related work", or mentions starting a research project. This agent integrates with Zotero for automated paper collection, organization, and full-text analysis. Examples:
Use this agent when the user provides a research paper (PDF/DOCX/arXiv link) or asks to learn writing patterns from papers, extract venue-specific writing signals, study paper structure, or mine rebuttal strategies. The agent writes extracted knowledge into the active installed paper-miner writing memory for ml-paper-writing. It does not maintain project-specific writing memory.
Use this agent when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "analyze review comments", or needs help with academic paper review response. This agent specializes in systematic rebuttal writing with professional tone and structured responses.
Test-driven development guide for writing tests first, implementing the smallest passing change, and keeping verification tight. Use when the user explicitly wants TDD or when a task should be driven by failing tests before code.
Run a blocker-first post-experiment workflow: validate evidence, produce strict statistical analysis when possible, and generate a decision-oriented results report only when the analysis bundle is sufficient. Uses results-analysis + results-report as a gated two-stage workflow.
Commit changes following Conventional Commits format (local only, no push).