finishing-a-development-branch
This skill guides developers through completing development work by verifying test success, determining the appropriate base branch, and presenting four options for branch handling: local merge, pull request creation, keeping the branch preserved, or discarding work entirely. Use it when implementation is finished, tests have passed, and the developer needs to decide how to integrate or manage the completed feature branch.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GanyuanRan/Aegis /tmp/finishing-a-development-branch && cp -r /tmp/finishing-a-development-branch/skills/finishing-a-development-branch ~/.claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branchSKILL.md
# Finishing a Development Branch ## Overview Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow. **Core principle:** Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work." ## The Process ### Step 1: Verify Tests **Before presenting options, verify tests pass:** ```bash # Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./... ``` **If tests fail:** ``` Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures] Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass. ``` Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2. **If tests pass:** Continue to Step 2. ### Step 2: Determine Base Branch ```bash # Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null ``` Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?" ### Step 3: Present Options Present exactly these 4 options: ``` Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) 4. Discard this work Which option? ``` **Don't add explanation** - keep options concise. ### Step 4: Execute Choice #### Option 1: Merge Locally ```bash # Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 2: Push and Create PR ```bash # Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )" ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 3: Keep As-Is Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." **Don't cleanup worktree.** #### Option 4: Discard **Confirm first:** ``` This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm. ``` Wait for exact confirmation. If confirmed: ```bash git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) ### Step 5: Cleanup Worktree **For Options 1, 2, 4:** Check if in worktree: ```bash git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current) ``` If yes: ```bash git worktree remove <worktree-path> ``` **For Option 3:** Keep worktree. ## Quick Reference | Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) | ## Common Mistakes **Skipping test verification** - **Problem:** Merge broken code, create failing PR - **Fix:** Always verify tests before offering options **Open-ended questions** - **Problem:** "What should I do next?" → ambiguous - **Fix:** Present exactly 4 structured options **Automatic worktree cleanup** - **Problem:** Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3) - **Fix:** Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4 **No confirmation for discard** - **Problem:** Accidentally delete work - **Fix:** Require typed "discard" confirmation ## Red Flags **Never:** - Proceed with failing tests - Merge without verifying tests on result - Delete work without confirmation - Force-push without explicit request **Always:** - Verify tests before offering options - Present exactly 4 options - Get typed confirmation for Option 4 - Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only ## Integration **Called by:** - **subagent-driven-development** (Step 7) - After all tasks complete - **executing-plans** (Step 5) - After all batches complete **Pairs with:** - **using-git-worktrees** - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
|
Deprecated - use the aegis:brainstorming skill instead
Deprecated - use the aegis:executing-plans skill instead
Deprecated - use the aegis:writing-plans skill instead
Use when retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or touching schema, persistence, or source-of-truth boundaries while deciding whether to delete old paths, retain compatibility, or stop for confirmation.
Use when defining new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or ambiguous medium/high-complexity work before implementation.
Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies