workflows
This workflow verifies that a Claude skill's technical content remains accurate by systematically checking its claims against current documentation, APIs, CLI tools, and frameworks. Use it when maintaining existing skills or before relying on a skill's instructions to ensure its references to external services, tools, and patterns haven't become outdated.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/glittercowboy/taches-cc-resources /tmp/workflows && cp -r /tmp/workflows/skills/create-agent-skills/workflows/verify- ~/.claude/skills/workflowsverify-skill.md
# Workflow: Verify Skill Content Accuracy
<required_reading>
**Read these reference files NOW:**
1. references/skill-structure.md
</required_reading>
<purpose>
Audit checks structure. **Verify checks truth.**
Skills contain claims about external things: APIs, CLI tools, frameworks, services. These change over time. This workflow checks if a skill's content is still accurate.
</purpose>
<process>
## Step 1: Select the Skill
```bash
ls ~/.claude/skills/
```
Present numbered list, ask: "Which skill should I verify for accuracy?"
## Step 2: Read and Categorize
Read the entire skill (SKILL.md + workflows/ + references/):
```bash
cat ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md
cat ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/workflows/*.md 2>/dev/null
cat ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/references/*.md 2>/dev/null
```
Categorize by primary dependency type:
| Type | Examples | Verification Method |
|------|----------|---------------------|
| **API/Service** | manage-stripe, manage-gohighlevel | Context7 + WebSearch |
| **CLI Tools** | build-macos-apps (xcodebuild, swift) | Run commands |
| **Framework** | build-iphone-apps (SwiftUI, UIKit) | Context7 for docs |
| **Integration** | setup-stripe-payments | WebFetch + Context7 |
| **Pure Process** | create-agent-skills | No external deps |
Report: "This skill is primarily [type]-based. I'll verify using [method]."
## Step 3: Extract Verifiable Claims
Scan skill content and extract:
**CLI Tools mentioned:**
- Tool names (xcodebuild, swift, npm, etc.)
- Specific flags/options documented
- Expected output patterns
**API Endpoints:**
- Service names (Stripe, Meta, etc.)
- Specific endpoints documented
- Authentication methods
- SDK versions
**Framework Patterns:**
- Framework names (SwiftUI, React, etc.)
- Specific APIs/patterns documented
- Version-specific features
**File Paths/Structures:**
- Expected project structures
- Config file locations
Present: "Found X verifiable claims to check."
## Step 4: Verify by Type
### For CLI Tools
```bash
# Check tool exists
which {tool-name}
# Check version
{tool-name} --version
# Verify documented flags work
{tool-name} --help | grep "{documented-flag}"
```
### For API/Service Skills
Use Context7 to fetch current documentation:
```
mcp__context7__resolve-library-id: {service-name}
mcp__context7__get-library-docs: {library-id}, topic: {relevant-topic}
```
Compare skill's documented patterns against current docs:
- Are endpoints still valid?
- Has authentication changed?
- Are there deprecated methods being used?
### For Framework Skills
Use Context7:
```
mcp__context7__resolve-library-id: {framework-name}
mcp__context7__get-library-docs: {library-id}, topic: {specific-api}
```
Check:
- Are documented APIs still current?
- Have patterns changed?
- Are there newer recommended approaches?
### For Integration Skills
WebSearch for recent changes:
```
"[service name] API changes 2025"
"[service name] breaking changes"
"[service name] deprecated endpoints"
```
Then Context7 for current SDK patterns.
### For Services with Status Pages
WebFetch official docs/changelog if available.
## Step 5: Generate Freshness Report
Present findings:
```
## Verification Report: {skill-name}
### ✅ Verified Current
- [Claim]: [Evidence it's still accurate]
### ⚠️ May Be Outdated
- [Claim]: [What changed / newer info found]
→ Current: [what docs now say]
### ❌ Broken / Invalid
- [Claim]: [Why it's wrong]
→ Fix: [What it should be]
### ℹ️ Could Not Verify
- [Claim]: [Why verification wasn't possible]
---
**Overall Status:** [Fresh / Needs Updates / Significantly Stale]
**Last Verified:** [Today's date]
```
## Step 6: Offer Updates
If issues found:
"Found [N] items that need updating. Would you like me to:"
1. **Update all** - Apply all corrections
2. **Review each** - Show each change before applying
3. **Just the report** - No changes
If updating:
- Make changes based on verified current information
- Add verification date comment if appropriate
- Report what was updated
## Step 7: Suggest Verification Schedule
Based on skill type, recommend:
| Skill Type | Recommended Frequency |
|------------|----------------------|
| API/Service | Every 1-2 months |
| Framework | Every 3-6 months |
| CLI Tools | Every 6 months |
| Pure Process | Annually |
"This skill should be re-verified in approximately [timeframe]."
</process>
<verification_shortcuts>
## Quick Verification Commands
**Check if CLI tool exists and get version:**
```bash
which {tool} && {tool} --version
```
**Context7 pattern for any library:**
```
1. resolve-library-id: "{library-name}"
2. get-library-docs: "{id}", topic: "{specific-feature}"
```
**WebSearch patterns:**
- Breaking changes: "{service} breaking changes 2025"
- Deprecations: "{service} deprecated API"
- Current best practices: "{framework} best practices 2025"
</verification_shortcuts>
<success_criteria>
Verification is complete when:
- [ ] Skill categorized by dependency type
- [ ] Verifiable claims extracted
- [ ] Each claim checked with appropriate method
- [ ] Freshness report generated
- [ ] Updates applied (if requested)
- [ ] User knows when to re-verify
</success_criteria>Expert skill auditor for Claude Code Skills. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating SKILL.md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a skill.
Expert slash command auditor for Claude Code slash commands. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating slash command .md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a slash command.
Expert subagent auditor for Claude Code subagents. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating subagent configuration files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a subagent.
Add todo item to TO-DOS.md with context from conversation
Gather requirements through adaptive questioning before executing any task
Heal skill documentation by applying corrections discovered during execution with approval workflow
Audit slash command file for YAML, arguments, dynamic context, tool restrictions, and content quality
Audit subagent configuration for role definition, prompt quality, tool selection, XML structure compliance, and effectiveness