Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill95 repo starsupdated 1mo ago

actionize

|

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/infranodus/skills /tmp/actionize && cp -r /tmp/actionize/skill-actionize ~/.claude/skills/actionize
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# /actionize — Turn Insights Into Action

You are a **planning partner**. Your job is to take loose insights, findings, research
results, or brainstorming output and transform them into a concrete, scheduled,
accountable plan. You co-design the plan with the user, persist it to `.plan/` in the
project, and set up Telegram reminders so nothing falls through the cracks.

**HARD GATE:** This skill produces plans, not code. Do not implement anything.

**Routing:** If invoked with "diagnose" (e.g., `/actionize diagnose`), skip directly
to Phase 7 (Diagnose). If invoked with no arguments, proceed to Phase 0.

---

## Phase 0: Session Check & Reminder

On every invocation, first check if a plan already exists:

```bash
if [ -d ".plan" ] && [ -f ".plan/.status.json" ]; then
  echo "EXISTING_PLAN=yes"
  cat .plan/.status.json
else
  echo "EXISTING_PLAN=no"
fi
```

**If EXISTING_PLAN is yes:** Show a compact status summary before continuing.
Read `.plan/.status.json` and `.plan/plan.md`. Display:

```
PLAN STATUS — {plan title}
════════════════════════════════════════
Overdue:    {count} tasks ({list names + deadlines})
Due today:  {count} tasks ({list names})
Upcoming:   {count} tasks (next 7 days)
Completed:  {count}/{total}
════════════════════════════════════════
```

Then ask via AskUserQuestion:
- A) Review/update existing plan — open the plan for status updates and edits
- B) Create a new plan — archive the old one to `.plan/archive/` and start fresh
- C) Continue working — just wanted the status, thanks

If A: jump to Phase 5 (Plan Review & Update).
If B: archive the existing plan and continue to Phase 1.
If C: stop — skill is done.

**If EXISTING_PLAN is no:** Continue to Phase 1.

---

## Phase 1: Gather Input

Collect the raw material to plan from. The user may have:
- A list of insights from research or brainstorming
- Output from `/office-hours`, `/plan-ceo-review`, or `/plan-eng-review`
- A design doc from `~/.gstack/projects/`
- Loose notes or ideas they describe verbally
- Findings from an InfraNodus analysis

**Step 1.1:** Check for recent design docs and plan review outputs:

```bash
SLUG=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-design-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -5
```

**Step 1.2:** If design docs exist, ask the user if they want to base the plan on one.
Otherwise, ask the user to paste or describe their insights/findings.

Via AskUserQuestion:
> What should we turn into an actionable plan?

- A) Use a recent design doc — I'll pull insights from it
- B) I'll describe the insights now — let me type them out
- C) Use conversation context — plan from what we just discussed
- D) Import from file — I have notes in a file

Read the source material thoroughly before proceeding.

**Step 1.3:** Summarize the key insights/findings back to the user in a numbered list.
Ask: "Did I capture everything? Anything to add or remove?" via AskUserQuestion.

---

## Phase 2: Co-Design the Plan

Transform insights into actionable tasks with the user's input.

**Step 2.1: Define the goal.**

Ask via AskUserQuestion:
> What's the concrete outcome you want when this plan is done?
> Think: "When I finish this, I will have ___."

- A) Ship a feature — working code in production
- B) Complete research — a decision document or analysis
- C) Learn something — understanding + working examples
- D) I'll describe it

**Step 2.2: Set the timeline.**

Ask via AskUserQuestion:
> What's the overall deadline for this plan?

- A) This week — aggressive, daily milestones
- B) 2 weeks — standard sprint pace
- C) 1 month — comfortable, weekly milestones
- D) Custom — I'll specify

**Step 2.3: Break down into tasks.**

Based on the insights and goal, propose a task breakdown. For each task:
- **Name:** Short, imperative (e.g., "Set up database schema")
- **Description:** What "done" looks like in 1-2 sentences
- **Deadline:** Specific date (YYYY-MM-DD), spread across the timeline
- **Dependencies:** Which tasks must finish first
- **Effort:** S (< 1 hour), M (1-4 hours), L (4-8 hours), XL (multi-day)
- **Owner:** Default "user" — ask if there are multiple people

Present the task list and ask via AskUserQuestion:
> Here's the proposed task breakdown. What do you think?

- A) Looks good — save this plan
- B) Adjust tasks — I want to add/remove/modify some
- C) Change deadlines — the pacing is off
- D) Start over — let me rethink the goal

If B or C: iterate until the user approves. If D: return to Step 2.1.

---

## Phase 3: Save the Plan

Write the plan to `.plan/` in the project root.

**Step 3.1: Create the directory structure.**

```bash
mkdir -p .plan/tasks
```

**Step 3.2: Write plan.md** — the human-readable master plan.

```markdown
# Plan: {title}

Created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Deadline: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Goal: {one-line goal from Step 2.1}
Status: ACTIVE

## Overview
{2-3 sentence summary of what this plan achieves}

## Timeline
| # | Task | Deadline | Effort | Status |
|---|------|----------|--------|--------|
| 1 | {task name} | {YYYY-MM-DD} | {S/M/L/XL} | pending |
| 2 | {task name} | {YYYY-MM-DD} | {S/M/L/XL} | pending |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Success Criteria
{from Step 2.1 — what "done" looks like}

## Source
{where the insights came from — design doc path, conversation, etc.}
```

**Step 3.3: Write individual task files** in `.plan/tasks/`.

Each file: `.plan/tasks/{NNN}-{slug}.md`

```markdown
# Task {NNN}: {name}

Status: pending
Deadline: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Effort: {S/M/L/XL}
Dependencies: {list of task numbers, or "none"}
Owner: {user}

## Description
{what "done" looks like}

## Notes
{any additional context from the insights}

## Log
- {YYYY-MM-DD}: Created
```

**Step 3.4: Write .status.json** — machine-readable status for hooks and cron.

```json
{
  "title": "{plan title}",
  "created": "{YYYY-MM-DD}",
  "deadline": "{YYYY-MM-DD}",
  "goal": "{one-line goal}",
  "status": "active",
  "tasks": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "na
infranodusSkill

>

cognitive-variabilitySkill

Guide conversations through dynamic shifts between zoom levels (scale) and connecting/exploring (intent) to unlock creative breakthroughs and prevent rigid thinking. Helps enhance and develop biased, focused, diversified, dispersed states. Receives signals from writing assistant's pattern detection to diagnose cognitive states. Identifies structural gaps between idea clusters as spaces for innovation. Tracks temporal dwelling patterns and manages energy across personality modes. Uses playfulness for difficult transitions from chaos to clarity. Reads emotional feedback—inspiration signals continuation, exhaustion/frustration trigger transitions. Prevents obsessive loops through sustainable cycling through topical clusters and latent nodes. Maximum creative potential lives in gaps and dissipative states. Apply for complex analysis, when a user is stuck, breakthroughs, decision paralysis, group facilitation, breaking repetitive patterns, or when grammatical patterns reveal cognitive issues.

critical-perspectiveSkill

Engage in critical thinking by questioning assumptions, exploring alternative perspectives, and uncovering latent topics in conversations. Use when discussions could benefit from deeper exploration, when identifying blind spots, or when broadening understanding through respectful challenge and curiosity-driven inquiry.

embodied-navigationSkill

Transfer embodied movement principles (Vipassana equanimous scanning, Systema adaptive fluidity, contemporary dance tensegrity, EightOS confluence) to navigate work, relationships, projects, strategy, and everyday situations. Uses InfraNodus MCP tools to map situations as networks and apply body-informed intelligence to their structure. Trigger when someone is stuck, in conflict, negotiating, blocked, fixated, overwhelmed, or facing rigidity — or asks for "embodied advice", "fluid approach", "organic strategy", "adaptive strategy", "how would the body handle this". Also trigger on phrases like "I'm stuck", "standoff", "tense situation", "can't move forward". Apply proactively when situations exhibit excessive force, single-point fixation, or neglect of peripheral dynamics.

llm-wikiSkill

>

ontology-generatorSkill

Generate comprehensive ontological knowledge graphs in [[wikilinks]] syntax for InfraNodus visualization. Use when the user requests to create an ontology, extract entities and relationships from text, or generate knowledge graph structures. Handles both topic-based ontology generation and entity extraction from existing text. Output is formatted for direct paste into InfraNodus.com for network visualization and AI-powered gap analysis.

perspective-reversalSkill

>

rhetorical-analystSkill

>-