022-root-cause-analysis
Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the root cause of a problem before proposing a fix. Part of Plinth Toolkit
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jabrena/plinth /tmp/022-root-cause-analysis && cp -r /tmp/022-root-cause-analysis/skills/022-root-cause-analysis ~/.claude/skills/022-root-cause-analysisSKILL.md
# Root Cause Analysis Guide the identification of root causes, not symptoms, for a framed problem, using Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. **This is an interactive SKILL**. **What is covered in this Skill?** - Five Whys for a linear causal chain from a symptom to a root cause - Fishbone (Ishikawa) for categorized candidate causes across multiple dimensions - Current Reality Tree for interconnected causes and effects with a small number of core problems - Constraint identification for the limiting factor holding the current state in place - Choosing the technique(s) proportionate to the problem's complexity - Feeding root-cause findings into `023-assumption-analysis` and the remaining Functional Specification lenses ## Constraints Distinguish root causes from symptoms before recommending a fix. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly. - **MUST** read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md` before applying Root Cause Analysis guidance - **MUST** distinguish a symptom (an observed effect) from a root cause (the condition that produces it) - **MUST** apply Five Whys as a chain of "why" questions grounded in evidence from the problem frame, not assumption - **MUST** apply Fishbone to organize candidate causes into categories (for example people, process, technology, environment) when more than one causal dimension is plausible - **MUST** apply Current Reality Tree when multiple symptoms may share one or a small number of core problems connected by cause-effect relationships - **MUST** identify the constraint limiting the current state, not only the most visible cause - **MUST NOT** invent a root cause when the available evidence is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead ## When to use this skill - Find the root cause of this problem - Apply Five Whys to this issue - Build a Fishbone diagram for this problem - Use Current Reality Tree to connect these symptoms - Identify the constraint limiting the current state - Draft the Root Cause Analysis section of a Functional Specification ## Workflow 1. **Read the Reference** Read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md`, then identify the symptom(s) evidenced by the problem frame. 2. **Apply Five Whys** Chain "why" questions from the symptom toward an evidenced root cause, stopping when further "why" steps would require guessing. 3. **Apply Fishbone When Multiple Dimensions Are Plausible** Organize candidate causes into categories when more than one causal dimension (people, process, technology, environment) is plausible. 4. **Apply Current Reality Tree When Symptoms Interconnect** Connect multiple symptoms to a small number of shared core problems through cause-effect relationships when the symptoms appear related. 5. **Identify the Constraint** Name the constraint limiting the current state, distinct from the most visible or most recently reported cause. 6. **Report the Root Cause Findings** Report findings using Five Whys, Fishbone, Current Reality Tree, and the identified constraint, and flag any finding left open pending a clarifying answer. ## Reference For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/022-root-cause-analysis.md](references/022-root-cause-analysis.md).
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with embedded commands inventory, following the embedded template exactly and producing INVENTORY-COMMANDS-JAVA.md in the project root. This should trigger for requests such as Create embedded commands inventory checklist; Generate INVENTORY-COMMANDS-JAVA.md; Use @001-commands-inventory; Inventory embedded Java project commands; List command files bundled for Java agents. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with embedded agents inventory, following the embedded template exactly and producing INVENTORY-AGENTS-JAVA.md in the project root. This should trigger for requests such as Create embedded agents inventory checklist; Generate INVENTORY-AGENTS-JAVA.md; Use @002-agents-inventory; Inventory embedded Java agent definitions; List generated agent roles for Java development. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with Java system prompts from skills.xml, following the embedded section template and producing INVENTORY-SKILLS-JAVA.md. This should trigger for requests such as Create Java system prompts checklist; Generate INVENTORY-SKILLS-JAVA.md; Use @003-skills-inventory; Inventory Java cursor rule skills; List available Java system prompt skills. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Use when you need to install the embedded project commands into command directories (.github/commands, .claude/commands, .cursor/command, .codex/commands), selecting the destination interactively and copying the embedded command definitions from project assets. This should trigger for requests such as Install embedded commands; Bootstrap .cursor/command; Bootstrap .claude/commands; Copy project commands; Install project command suite. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Use when you need to install the embedded robot agents into .github/agents, .claude/agents, .cursor/agents, or .codex/agents, selecting the destination interactively and copying the embedded agent definitions from project assets. This should trigger for requests such as Install embedded agents; Bootstrap .github/agents; Bootstrap .cursor/agents; Bootstrap .claude/agents; Bootstrap .codex/agents; Copy robot agents. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Guides the creation of agile epics with comprehensive definition including business value, success criteria, and breakdown into user stories. Use when the user wants to create an agile epic, define large bodies of work, break down features into user stories, or document strategic initiatives. This should trigger for requests such as Create an agile epic; Write an epic; I need to create an epic; Define an epic; Epic definition. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Guides the creation of detailed agile feature documentation from an existing epic. Use when the user wants to split an epic into feature files, derive features with scope and acceptance criteria, or plan feature documentation for stakeholders or engineering. This should trigger for requests such as Create features from an epic; Split epic into features; Feature files from epic; Derive features from epic; Break down an agile epic into deliverable features. Part of Plinth Toolkit