roadmap
This Claude Code skill generates phased technical roadmaps for building complete applications, then executes them autonomously across multiple sessions. Use it when starting a major product from a research brief or product description, converting vague ideas into executable multi-week delivery plans, or planning complex builds that span many Claude Code sessions before saying "build this." The skill establishes vision, locks in tech stack, designs the data model, and breaks work into concrete phases with actionable tasks ordered for sequential delivery without backtracking.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jezweb/claude-skills /tmp/roadmap && cp -r /tmp/roadmap/plugins/dev-tools/skills/roadmap ~/.claude/skills/roadmapSKILL.md
# Roadmap
Generate a comprehensive technical roadmap for building an entire application. Detailed enough that Claude Code can pick up any phase and execute it autonomously for hours.
This is not a high-level strategy doc. It's a **delivery blueprint** — every phase has concrete tasks, every task is actionable, and the whole thing is ordered so you can build from phase 1 through to launch without backtracking.
## When to Use
- Starting a major new product (after deep-research, or from a product brief)
- Converting a vague idea into an executable plan
- Planning a multi-week build that will span many Claude Code sessions
- Before saying "build this" — the roadmap is what you hand Claude Code to execute
## Inputs
The skill needs one of these:
| Input | Where to find it |
|-------|-----------------|
| Deep research brief | `.jez/artifacts/research-brief-{topic}.md` (from `/deep-research`) |
| Product brief | User describes what they want to build |
| Existing partial app | Read CLAUDE.md + codebase to understand what exists |
| Competitor to clone/improve | URL or product name — skill analyses it |
If the user just says "plan a note-taking app on Cloudflare", that's enough — ask clarifying questions as needed.
## Workflow
### 1. Establish the Vision
Before any technical planning, nail down:
- **One sentence**: What is this? ("A cloud-native markdown knowledge workspace for teams and AI agents")
- **Who**: Primary users, secondary users, agents? ("Jez first, then Jezweb team, then clients")
- **Why**: What existing tools fail at? What's the gap? ("Existing tools are headless — you can't browse them or stumble across things")
- **Constraint**: Stack, budget, timeline, must-haves? ("Cloudflare, must have MCP, needs to be a PWA")
- **Not building**: What's explicitly out of scope? ("No real-time CRDT collab, no plugin ecosystem")
### 2. Define the Stack
Based on the vision and constraints, lock in the technical stack:
```markdown
| Layer | Choice | Why |
|-------|--------|-----|
| Frontend | [framework] | [reason] |
| Backend | [framework + runtime] | [reason] |
| Database | [engine + ORM] | [reason] |
| Auth | [provider] | [reason] |
| Storage | [service] | [reason] |
| Search | [method] | [reason] |
| Hosting | [platform] | [reason] |
```
If a deep-research brief exists, pull the recommendations from there. If not, make opinionated choices based on the user's existing stack (check `~/Documents/` for patterns).
### 3. Design the Data Model
Sketch all tables/collections the full product will need. Not just phase 1 — the complete model. This prevents schema redesigns mid-build.
```markdown
## Data Model
### [entity]
id, [type]
[field], [type], [constraints]
...
created_at, updated_at
### [entity]
...
### Relationships
- [entity] has many [entity] via [field]
- [entity] belongs to [entity] via [field]
```
Mark which tables are needed in which phase. Phase 1 might only need 3 of 8 tables, but designing them all upfront avoids migration pain.
### 4. Plan the Phases
This is the core of the roadmap. Each phase must:
- **Have a clear goal** — one sentence describing what's different when this phase is done
- **Be independently deployable** — the app works (with reduced features) after each phase
- **Build on the previous phase** — no phase requires ripping out what came before
- **Be completable in 1-3 Claude Code sessions** — if a phase takes more than a day, split it
#### Phase Structure
For each phase:
```markdown
## Phase N — [Name]
*Goal: [One sentence — what the user can do after this phase that they couldn't before]*
*Depends on: Phase N-1*
*Estimated effort: [hours/sessions]*
### What's New
[Bullet list of user-visible features]
### Database Changes
[New tables, new columns, migrations needed]
### API Routes
[New endpoints this phase adds]
### Frontend
[New pages, components, UI changes]
### Infrastructure
[New Cloudflare resources, secrets, config]
### Task Checklist
[Actionable tasks grouped by area — these are what Claude Code executes]
#### Setup
- [ ] [task]
#### Data Layer
- [ ] [task]
- [ ] [task]
#### API
- [ ] [task]
#### Frontend
- [ ] [task]
#### Testing & Polish
- [ ] [task]
- [ ] [task]
### Definition of Done
[How to verify this phase is complete — what to test, what to deploy]
```
### 5. Phase Planning Patterns
#### Phase 1 — Always the MVP
The first phase must produce something **usable by one person for one purpose**. Not a demo, not a skeleton — a working tool that replaces whatever the user currently does (even if it's a spreadsheet or Apple Notes).
Phase 1 scope test: "Would you use this instead of what you use now?" If no, the MVP is too thin.
Typical Phase 1:
- Auth (single user or invite-only)
- Core data model (2-3 tables)
- CRUD for the primary entity
- Basic UI (list + detail + create/edit)
- Deploy to production domain
- Bare minimum styling (dark mode, responsive)
#### Phase 2 — Make It Real
The second phase turns the MVP into something you'd show to others:
- Polish the UI
- Add secondary features (search, filters, sort)
- Better error handling and validation
- Empty states and onboarding (use the `onboarding-ux` skill)
- Mobile responsiveness
- Data export/import
#### Phase 3 — The Differentiator
What makes this product different from alternatives? Build that here:
- AI features, MCP server, semantic search
- The thing competitors don't have
- The reason someone would choose this over the established player
#### Phase 4+ — Growth Features
Each subsequent phase adds capabilities:
- Multi-user / team features
- Advanced views (graph, canvas, calendar, kanban)
- Integrations (API, webhooks, third-party connections)
- Admin / settings
- Performance optimisation
- Public-facing features (sharing, embedding, white-label)
#### Final Phase — Platform
Only if the product is heading toward multi-tenant / SaaS:
- Client workspaces
- Billing / plans
- White-label / custom domains
- API tokens for third-party accesGenerate AI images using Gemini or GPT APIs directly. Covers model selection (Gemini for scenes; GPT Image 2 for text rendering, batch variations, multi-reference compositing; GPT Image 1.5 for transparent icons), the 5-part prompting framework, API calling patterns, multi-turn editing, and quality assurance. Produces photorealistic scenes, icons, illustrations, OG images, posters, infographics, and product shots. Use when building websites that need images, creating marketing assets, or generating visual content. Triggers: 'generate image', 'ai image', 'create hero image', 'make an icon', 'generate illustration', 'create og image', 'poster', 'infographic', 'image variations', 'gpt-image-2', 'ai art', 'image generation'.
Generate complete user documentation for a web app with screenshots. Browses the app via browser automation, screenshots every screen, and produces a structured user guide with step-by-step instructions, annotated screenshots, workflow diagrams, and reference tables. Supports quick (key screens), standard (all pages), thorough (every state and flow), and exhaustive (publishable documentation suite). Triggers: 'document the app', 'user guide', 'app documentation', 'screenshot docs', 'generate user docs', 'help docs', 'how-to guide', 'write the docs'.
Australian business English for professional writing — warm, direct, EN-AU spelling (colour, organise, centre), no filler words. Use whenever the user is writing for an Australian audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text.
Write compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives. Use whenever the user is applying for a business award (Telstra, chamber of commerce, industry awards), a grant, a competition, or any submission demonstrating merit against defined criteria.
Get a second opinion from leading AI models on code, architecture, strategy, prompting, or anything. Queries models via OpenRouter, Gemini, or OpenAI APIs. Supports single opinion, multi-model consensus, and devil's advocate patterns. Use whenever the user says 'brains trust', 'second opinion', 'ask gemini', 'ask gpt', 'peer review', 'consult another model', 'challenge this', or 'devil's advocate'.
Hit the Cloudflare REST API directly for operations that wrangler and MCP can't handle well. Bulk DNS, custom hostnames, email routing, cache purge, WAF rules, redirect rules, zone settings, Worker routes, D1 cross-database queries, R2 bulk operations, KV bulk read/write, Vectorize queries, Queues, and fleet-wide resource audits. Produces curl commands or scripts. Triggers: 'cloudflare api', 'bulk dns', 'custom hostname', 'email routing', 'cache purge', 'waf rule', 'd1 query', 'r2 bucket', 'kv bulk', 'vectorize query', 'audit resources', 'fleet operation'.
Scaffold and deploy Cloudflare Workers with Hono routing, Vite plugin, and Static Assets. Describe project, scaffold structure, configure bindings, deploy. Use whenever the user wants to create a Worker project, set up Hono on Cloudflare, configure D1 / R2 / KV / Queues bindings, or troubleshoot Worker export syntax, API route conflicts, HMR issues, or deployment failures.
Run an independent code review using the OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Gets a second opinion from a different model family (the current Codex models) on recent changes, a PR, a commit, or the whole app — covering bugs, regressions, security, data consistency, UX/state bugs, performance risks, and testing gaps. Saves a severity-prioritised report to .jez/reviews/. Triggers: 'codex review', 'review with codex', 'independent code review', 'what does codex think', 'get codex to review'.