dhdna-profiler
The dhdna-profiler extracts cognitive fingerprints from text by analyzing twelve dimensions of thinking patterns, including analytical depth, creativity, emotional processing, and ethical reasoning. Use this skill when analyzing how someone reasons, comparing thinking styles between individuals, or when a user requests cognitive profiling, thinking pattern analysis, or wants to understand the reasoning signature behind any written or spoken content.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills /tmp/dhdna-profiler && cp -r /tmp/dhdna-profiler/skills/dhdna-profiler ~/.claude/skills/dhdna-profilerSKILL.md
# DHDNA Profiler — Cognitive Pattern Extraction A structured system for extracting the cognitive fingerprint of any text's author. Based on the Digital Human DNA (DHDNA) framework — the theory that every mind has a unique signature pattern expressed through how it reasons, decides, values, and communicates. Published research: [DHDNA Pre-print (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18736629)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18736629) | [IDNA Consolidation v2 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18807387)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18807387) ## Core Concept Just as biological DNA encodes physical identity through base pairs, Digital Human DNA encodes cognitive identity through thinking patterns. Every person's combination of analytical depth, creative range, emotional processing, strategic thinking, and ethical reasoning creates a **unique cognitive signature** — as distinctive as a fingerprint. The profiler doesn't judge thinking as "good" or "bad." It maps the topology of how a mind works. ## The 12 Cognitive Dimensions When profiling text, score each dimension on a 1–10 scale based on evidence in the text: | # | Dimension | What It Measures | Low Score (1-3) | High Score (8-10) | | --- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | | 1 | **Analytical Depth** | Logical rigor, structured reasoning, causal chains | Intuitive, holistic, pattern-based | Systematic, proof-oriented, precise | | 2 | **Creative Range** | Novelty of connections, metaphor use, lateral thinking | Conventional, incremental | Paradigm-breaking, cross-domain synthesis | | 3 | **Emotional Processing** | Emotional vocabulary, empathy signals, affect integration | Detached, clinical | Emotionally rich, feeling-integrated | | 4 | **Linguistic Precision** | Vocabulary sophistication, sentence architecture, rhetoric | Simple, direct | Architecturally complex, nuanced | | 5 | **Ethical Reasoning** | Values signals, fairness concern, consequence awareness | Pragmatic, outcome-focused | Principle-driven, justice-oriented | | 6 | **Strategic Thinking** | Long-term planning, competitive awareness, resource optimization | Tactical, reactive | Multi-move, game-theoretic | | 7 | **Memory Integration** | Reference to past experience, historical patterns, continuity | Present-focused | Deep historical awareness, precedent-driven | | 8 | **Social Intelligence** | Audience awareness, perspective-taking, relational framing | Self-referential | Deeply other-aware, coalition-building | | 9 | **Domain Expertise** | Technical depth, specialized knowledge, jargon confidence | Generalist | Deep specialist | | 10 | **Intuitive Reasoning** | Gut-feel signals, heuristic shortcuts, pattern leaps | Methodical, step-by-step | Leap-of-faith, insight-driven | | 11 | **Temporal Orientation** | Time-horizon of thinking — past, present, or future focus | Present-anchored | Time-spanning, historical-to-futurist | | 12 | **Metacognition** | Self-awareness of own thinking, uncertainty acknowledgment | Unreflective | Deeply self-aware, thinks about thinking | ### The 6 Tension Pairs Dimensions exist in tension — high scores on one often correlate with lower scores on its pair. These tensions ARE the cognitive signature: | Pair | Tension | What It Reveals | | -------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | | DIM 1 ↔ DIM 10 | Analytical ↔ Intuitive | Logic vs. Gut — how the mind reaches conclusions | | DIM 3 ↔ DIM 6 | Emotional ↔ Strategic | Heart vs. Head — what drives decisions | | DIM 2 ↔ DIM 5 | Creative ↔ Ethical | Freedom vs. Framework — innovation within or beyond rules | | DIM 4 ↔ DIM 12 | Linguistic ↔ Metacognitive | Expression vs. Self-Awareness — external craft vs. internal reflection | | DIM 7 ↔ DIM 11 | Memory ↔ Temporal | Past vs. Time Itself — experience vs. time-horizon | | DIM 8 ↔ DIM 9 | Social ↔ Domain | Breadth vs. Depth — people skills vs. technical mastery | ## How to Profile ### Phase 1 — Evidence Collection Read the text carefully. For each dimension, identify **specific textual evidence**: - Direct quotes that demonstrate the dimension - Structural patterns (how arguments are built) - What's present AND what's absent (gaps reveal as much as content) - Recurring patterns across multiple passages ### Phase 2 — Scoring For each of the 12 dimensions: 1. Score 1-10 based on evidence 2. Cite the strongest textual evidence for that score 3. Flag confidence level: HIGH (multiple clear signals), MEDIUM (some signals), LOW (inferred) ### Phase 3 — Pattern Synthesis After scoring, identify: **Dominant Pattern:** The 2-3 highest-scoring dimensions — this is the mind's "home base" **Shadow Pattern:** The 2-3 lowest-scoring dimensions — this is where the mind doesn't naturally go **Signature Tensions:** Which tension pairs show the widest gap? These define the cognitive style more than any individual score. **Reasoning Topology:** How does the mind move through ideas? - Linear (A → B → C → conclusion) - Spiral (approaches the same idea from multiple angles, each time deeper) - Web (connects disparate do
How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.
Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.
Infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from gene expression data using scalable algorithms (GRNBoost2, GENIE3). Use when analyzing transcriptomics data (bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq) to identify transcription factor-target gene relationships and regulatory interactions. Supports distributed computation for large-scale datasets.
Core Python library for astronomy and astrophysics workflows that need Astropy APIs, including units/quantities, coordinates, FITS I/O, tables, time systems, WCS, and cosmology. Use when implementing or debugging astronomical data analysis code with Astropy.
Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.
Benchling Python SDK and REST API integration for registry entities, inventory, ELN entries, workflows, Benchling Apps, and Data Warehouse queries. Use when automating lab data with benchling-sdk or the v2 API.
Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.