component-refactoring
The component-refactoring Claude Code skill refactors high-complexity React components in the Dify frontend codebase using custom hooks, component splitting, and state extraction patterns. Use it when `pnpm analyze-component --json` indicates complexity exceeding 50 or line count surpassing 300, when users explicitly request code splitting or hook extraction, or when warnings recommend refactoring before testing; skip it for simple well-structured components, third-party library wrappers, or when users prioritize testing over refactoring.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/langgenius/dify /tmp/component-refactoring && cp -r /tmp/component-refactoring/.agents/skills/component-refactoring ~/.claude/skills/component-refactoringSKILL.md
# Dify Component Refactoring Skill
Refactor high-complexity React components in the Dify frontend codebase with the patterns and workflow below.
> **Complexity Threshold**: Components with complexity > 50 (measured by `pnpm analyze-component`) should be refactored before testing.
## Quick Reference
### Commands (run from `web/`)
Use paths relative to `web/` (e.g., `app/components/...`).
Use `refactor-component` for refactoring prompts and `analyze-component` for testing prompts and metrics.
```bash
cd web
# Generate refactoring prompt
pnpm refactor-component <path>
# Output refactoring analysis as JSON
pnpm refactor-component <path> --json
# Generate testing prompt (after refactoring)
pnpm analyze-component <path>
# Output testing analysis as JSON
pnpm analyze-component <path> --json
```
### Complexity Analysis
```bash
# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path> --json
# Key metrics to check:
# - complexity: normalized score 0-100 (target < 50)
# - maxComplexity: highest single function complexity
# - lineCount: total lines (target < 300)
```
### Complexity Score Interpretation
| Score | Level | Action |
|-------|-------|--------|
| 0-25 | 🟢 Simple | Ready for testing |
| 26-50 | 🟡 Medium | Consider minor refactoring |
| 51-75 | 🟠 Complex | **Refactor before testing** |
| 76-100 | 🔴 Very Complex | **Must refactor** |
## Core Refactoring Patterns
### Pattern 1: Extract Custom Hooks
**When**: Component has complex state management, multiple `useState`/`useEffect`, or business logic mixed with UI.
**Dify Convention**: Place hooks in a `hooks/` subdirectory or alongside the component as `use-<feature>.ts`.
```typescript
// ❌ Before: Complex state logic in component
function Configuration() {
const [modelConfig, setModelConfig] = useState<ModelConfig>(...)
const [datasetConfigs, setDatasetConfigs] = useState<DatasetConfigs>(...)
const [completionParams, setCompletionParams] = useState<FormValue>({})
// 50+ lines of state management logic...
return <div>...</div>
}
// ✅ After: Extract to custom hook
// hooks/use-model-config.ts
export const useModelConfig = (appId: string) => {
const [modelConfig, setModelConfig] = useState<ModelConfig>(...)
const [completionParams, setCompletionParams] = useState<FormValue>({})
// Related state management logic here
return { modelConfig, setModelConfig, completionParams, setCompletionParams }
}
// Component becomes cleaner
function Configuration() {
const { modelConfig, setModelConfig } = useModelConfig(appId)
return <div>...</div>
}
```
**Dify Examples**:
- `web/app/components/app/configuration/hooks/use-advanced-prompt-config.ts`
- `web/app/components/app/configuration/debug/hooks.tsx`
- `web/app/components/workflow/hooks/use-workflow.ts`
### Pattern 2: Extract Sub-Components
**When**: Single component has multiple UI sections, conditional rendering blocks, or repeated patterns.
**Dify Convention**: Place sub-components in subdirectories or as separate files in the same directory.
```typescript
// ❌ Before: Monolithic JSX with multiple sections
const AppInfo = () => {
return (
<div>
{/* 100 lines of header UI */}
{/* 100 lines of operations UI */}
{/* 100 lines of modals */}
</div>
)
}
// ✅ After: Split into focused components
// app-info/
// ├── index.tsx (orchestration only)
// ├── app-header.tsx (header UI)
// ├── app-operations.tsx (operations UI)
// └── app-modals.tsx (modal management)
const AppInfo = () => {
const { showModal, setShowModal } = useAppInfoModals()
return (
<div>
<AppHeader appDetail={appDetail} />
<AppOperations onAction={handleAction} />
<AppModals show={showModal} onClose={() => setShowModal(null)} />
</div>
)
}
```
**Dify Examples**:
- `web/app/components/app/configuration/` directory structure
- `web/app/components/workflow/nodes/` per-node organization
### Pattern 3: Simplify Conditional Logic
**When**: Deep nesting (> 3 levels), complex ternaries, or multiple `if/else` chains.
```typescript
// ❌ Before: Deeply nested conditionals
const Template = useMemo(() => {
if (appDetail?.mode === AppModeEnum.CHAT) {
switch (locale) {
case LanguagesSupported[1]:
return <TemplateChatZh />
case LanguagesSupported[7]:
return <TemplateChatJa />
default:
return <TemplateChatEn />
}
}
if (appDetail?.mode === AppModeEnum.ADVANCED_CHAT) {
// Another 15 lines...
}
// More conditions...
}, [appDetail, locale])
// ✅ After: Use lookup tables + early returns
const TEMPLATE_MAP = {
[AppModeEnum.CHAT]: {
[LanguagesSupported[1]]: TemplateChatZh,
[LanguagesSupported[7]]: TemplateChatJa,
default: TemplateChatEn,
},
[AppModeEnum.ADVANCED_CHAT]: {
[LanguagesSupported[1]]: TemplateAdvancedChatZh,
// ...
},
}
const Template = useMemo(() => {
const modeTemplates = TEMPLATE_MAP[appDetail?.mode]
if (!modeTemplates) return null
const TemplateComponent = modeTemplates[locale] || modeTemplates.default
return <TemplateComponent appDetail={appDetail} />
}, [appDetail, locale])
```
### Pattern 4: Extract API/Data Logic
**When**: Component directly handles API calls, data transformation, or complex async operations.
**Dify Convention**:
- This skill is for component decomposition, not query/mutation design.
- Do not introduce deprecated `useInvalid` / `useReset`.
- Do not add thin passthrough `useQuery` wrappers during refactoring; only extract a custom hook when it truly orchestrates multiple queries/mutations or shared derived state.
**Dify Examples**:
- `web/service/use-workflow.ts`
- `web/service/use-common.ts`
- `web/service/knowledge/use-dataset.ts`
- `web/service/knowledge/use-document.ts`
### Pattern 5: Extract Modal/Dialog Management
**When**: Component manages multiple modals with complex open/close states.
**Dify Convention**: Modals should be extracted with their state maReview backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.
Write, update, or review Dify end-to-end tests under `e2e/` that use Cucumber, Gherkin, and Playwright. Use when the task involves `.feature` files, `features/step-definitions/`, `features/support/`, `DifyWorld`, scenario tags, locator/assertion choices, or E2E testing best practices for this repository.
Review Dify frontend code for correctness, accessibility, component design, dify-ui usage, data/query boundaries, performance, and tests. Trigger for `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`, UI, React, Next.js, pending-change, or focused frontend review requests.
Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.
React/TypeScript component style guide. Use when writing, refactoring, or reviewing React components, especially around props typing, state boundaries, shared local state with Jotai atoms, API types, query/mutation contracts, navigation, memoization, wrappers, and empty-state handling.
Lightweight coding guardrails for making focused, simple, and verifiable changes in this repo. Use for all coding work.