fixflow
Use when executing coding tasks with a strict delivery workflow: build a full plan, implement one step at a time, run tests continuously, and commit by default after each step (`per_step`). Support explicit commit policy overrides (`final_only`, `milestone`) and optional BDD (Given/When/Then) when users ask for behavior-driven delivery or requirements are unclear.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook /tmp/fixflow && cp -r /tmp/fixflow/skills/fixflow ~/.claude/skills/fixflowSKILL.md
# Fixflow ## Overview Use this skill to deliver end-to-end engineering work in one run: - Plan fully. - Execute in strict sequence. - Validate continuously. - Use explicit commit policy (`per_step` default; `final_only`/`milestone` when requested). - Add BDD behavior specs when requested or when requirements are ambiguous. ## Trigger Cues Trigger this skill when the user asks for one or more of: - Full plan + sequential execution. - No backward compatibility. - Test everything before handoff. - Commit after completion or commit before each next step. - Behavior-driven delivery (BDD) or acceptance scenarios. ## Workflow ### 1. Define Ready Criteria (DoR) > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) ### 2. Build Complete Plan Before Editing > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) ### 3. Add BDD/TDD Layer When Needed Use BDD if user requests it, or if requirements are unclear. #### 3.0 TDD Mode (RED -> GREEN -> IMPROVE) When user requests TDD or test-driven delivery: 1. **RED** — Write a failing test first - Extract testable behavior from requirements - Write minimal test case asserting expected behavior - Run test, confirm it fails (red) - If test passes unexpectedly -> requirement already met or test is wrong 2. **GREEN** — Write minimal implementation - Write just enough code to make the test pass - No extra improvements, no "while I'm here" changes - Run test, confirm it passes (green) 3. **IMPROVE** — Refactor under green tests - Eliminate duplication, improve naming, simplify logic - Run tests after each refactor to confirm no regression - Refactoring must not change external behavior Coverage target: 80% line coverage for new code, 100% for critical paths. Trigger cues for TDD mode: - User says "TDD", "test-driven", "test first" - User says "write tests before code" - Requirements are well-defined with clear inputs/outputs For BDD Lite, Scenario Quality Checklist, Scenario Outline, and Test Layer mapping, see the shared reference: > [`references/bdd-guide.md`](./references/bdd-guide.md) ### 4. Execute Step by Step > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) For `per_step` (default): - Stage only files for current step. - Run step-level checks. - Commit immediately after step checks pass. - Record step -> commit hash mapping. ### 5. Apply No-Backward-Compatibility Mode (When Requested) > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) ### 6. Validate with Test Matrix (Verification Loop) > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) ### 7. Commit and Handoff > See shared delivery base: [`references/delivery-base.md`](./references/delivery-base.md) ## Guardrails - Do not stop at planning when implementation is expected. - Do not leave partially completed plan steps. - Do not defer required testing when it can be run now. - Do not default to `final_only`; use `per_step` unless user explicitly asks otherwise. - Do not move to the next plan step before committing when `commit_policy = per_step`. - Do not claim compatibility if user explicitly requested no compatibility work. - Do not include unrelated pre-existing dirty files in commits. - Do not hand off without concrete validation evidence.
Senior backend TypeScript architect specializing in Bun/Node.js runtime, API design, database optimization, and scalable server architecture.
Expert at exploring and understanding legacy and unfamiliar codebases. Maps dependencies, identifies patterns, and creates documentation for complex systems.
Kubernetes architect specializing in cluster design, manifests, Helm charts, GitOps workflows, security policies, and production operations.
Systematic open source contributor that analyzes projects, finds suitable issues, implements fixes, and creates high-quality PRs with high acceptance probability.
Application security expert specializing in SAST, vulnerability assessment, OWASP Top 10, compliance auditing, and security architecture review.
Fullstack code reviewer with 15+ years experience analyzing code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, architectural decisions, and best practices.
Senior technical lead who analyzes complex projects and coordinates multi-step development tasks. Delegates to specialized agents and ensures quality delivery.
Use when the user explicitly asks to stage all current changes, create a commit, and push to the remote after safety checks.