flowguard
Flowguard is a coordination skill for multi-step AI agent tasks that risk context loss, drift, or escalating costs. Use it when executing autonomous loops, bug fixes, repository changes, PR readiness checks, or handoffs spanning many tool calls, files, sessions, or verification gates. It routes work through explicit lifecycle phases (clarify, plan, or execute), verifies current state before starting, and establishes resumable checkpoints to prevent scope creep and compounding errors.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook /tmp/flowguard && cp -r /tmp/flowguard/skills/flowguard ~/.claude/skills/flowguardSKILL.md
# Flowguard ## Overview Use this skill as the single lifecycle entrypoint for agent work that can drift, lose context, or become expensive. It routes the task, verifies current state, runs bounded execution loops, and leaves a resumable handoff. This skill coordinates other skills; it does not replace them. Use task-specific skills such as `fixflow`, `plan-flow`, `codex-retrospective`, or `vibeguard` only when their trigger is clearly met. ## Operating Contract - Do not start a long autonomous loop until route, scope, and stop conditions are explicit. - Do not treat memory, summaries, or handoffs as current truth until repo, git, files, runtime, or remote state is verified. - Do not claim completion without fresh verification evidence from the current session. - Do not expand scope, touch destructive surfaces, or cross file-ownership lanes without stopping to re-route. - Prefer one controlling checkpoint over many specialized workflow fragments when the task risk is context loss, drift, or compounding errors. ## Route First Choose one route before editing files or running a long loop: | Route | Use When | Action | |---|---|---| | `execute_direct` | Goal, context, constraints, and done-when are clear; scope is small or verification is cheap. | Work directly with short checkpoints. | | `plan_first` | Work spans many files, sessions, agents, architecture decisions, migrations, or risky sequencing. | Create a brief execution plan or use the relevant planning skill before edits. | | `clarify_first` | Goal, target files, constraints, done-when, destructive permission, production impact, or ownership is unclear. | Ask the smallest blocking question before continuing. | Do not hide ambiguity inside assumptions. If a wrong assumption would cause large rewrites, production risk, data loss, credential exposure, or wasted long-loop cost, use `clarify_first`. ## Startup 1. Search first for existing files, skills, plans, or prior artifacts that may already cover the task. 2. Load every applicable `AGENTS.md` for files that may be edited. 3. Run the state snapshot when working in a repo or resuming. Resolve it from the installed Flowguard skill directory, not from the target repo: ```bash # From the installed flowguard skill directory, the directory containing this SKILL.md: scripts/workflow_state_snapshot.sh /path/to/target/repo ``` When already in the target repo, pass `.` as the target to the installed script, for example `/path/to/installed/flowguard/scripts/workflow_state_snapshot.sh .`. 4. If the task continues previous work, treat memory and summaries as hints only. Verify cwd, git branch, dirty files, relevant artifacts, and runtime state before relying on them. 5. Capture the four task elements: goal, context, constraints, and done-when. If one is missing and risky, clarify. ## Preflight Contract Before substantial work, write or state the compact preflight: ```text route: goal: context: constraints: done_when: out_of_scope: verification_commands: stop_conditions: handoff_location: ``` For short direct tasks, this can be one concise paragraph. For long tasks, make it explicit and keep it available for compaction or resume. ## Execution Loop Use a step-test-update loop: 1. Select one current step with owned files and an expected check. 2. Announce the edit boundary before changing files. 3. Make the smallest useful change. 4. Run focused verification for that step when feasible. 5. Record a checkpoint with changed files, command results, decisions, blockers, and next step. Stop and re-evaluate when any condition occurs: - The same fix fails 3 times. - Scope expands beyond the preflight. - Required data is missing or stale. - A tool result conflicts with the plan. - Tests or builds fail for reasons unrelated to the current hypothesis. - The user sends a newer instruction that changes priority. - Token, tool-call, wall-time, or external-cost budget is exceeded. ## Failure Modes - **Assumption drift**: the route says `execute_direct`, but new evidence shows missing goal, constraints, or done-when. Stop and re-route. - **Summary-of-summary loss**: compaction or handoff omits modified files, decisions, or verification commands. Rebuild state from local truth before editing. - **Stale memory**: remembered project facts conflict with current files, git, runtime, or GitHub state. Use current evidence. - **Silent tool failure**: an empty, partial, or "close enough" tool result becomes input for later steps. Mark it as a blocker or rerun with a narrower check. - **Parallel merge risk**: two lanes need the same writable file. Collapse to one integration owner before continuing. ## Verification Gate Do not claim completion from expectation or older output. Report fresh evidence from this session. Pick checks from the repo, `AGENTS.md`, and changed surface. Common defaults: | Stack | Before Completion | Before Submission | |---|---|---| | Rust | `cargo check` | `cargo test` | | TypeScript | `npx tsc --noEmit` | project test command | | Go | `go build ./...` | `go test ./...` | | Python | focused import/type/lint check if present | `pytest` | If a check cannot run, say why and name the nearest useful fallback that did run. ## Handoff And Resume Read `references/state-contract.md` when asked to create a handoff, resume after compaction, continue a previous task, or prepare automation. Required handoff fields: - modified files - constraint set or SPEC - verification command and result - key decisions - current priority - L1-L7 rule summary when VibeGuard applies - blockers and next action Resume must start by comparing the handoff with current local truth. If cwd, branch, files, tests, or user priority changed, update the plan before editing. ## Multi-Agent Rule Use parallel agents only when file ownership is disjoint and merge ownership is explicit. A delegation must name: - agent or lane - writable files or directories - read-only context - expected output artifact - ve
Senior backend TypeScript architect specializing in Bun/Node.js runtime, API design, database optimization, and scalable server architecture.
Expert at exploring and understanding legacy and unfamiliar codebases. Maps dependencies, identifies patterns, and creates documentation for complex systems.
Kubernetes architect specializing in cluster design, manifests, Helm charts, GitOps workflows, security policies, and production operations.
Systematic open source contributor that analyzes projects, finds suitable issues, implements fixes, and creates high-quality PRs with high acceptance probability.
Application security expert specializing in SAST, vulnerability assessment, OWASP Top 10, compliance auditing, and security architecture review.
Fullstack code reviewer with 15+ years experience analyzing code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, architectural decisions, and best practices.
Senior technical lead who analyzes complex projects and coordinates multi-step development tasks. Delegates to specialized agents and ensures quality delivery.
Use when the user explicitly asks to stage all current changes, create a commit, and push to the remote after safety checks.